es/
(*Config.cmake file) [1]
[1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/all/shared-desktop-ontologies/filelist
--
Modestas Vainius
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-buildsystem@kde.org
ht
ich when found, does the rest.
But in general *Config.cmake deprecates the need for that small
FindKDE4.cmake.
--
Modestas Vainius
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-buildsystem@kde
#x27;s
more, this is kdebindings we talking about. It is mind-blowing enough to
package and maintain in a sane state. There is no need to keep other KDE
modules unbuilt just because one small app needs kdebindings at run-time.
--
Modestas Vainius
signature.asc
Descript
as not made to the archive yet.
However, I still think that KDElibs should stick to cmake defaults with
respect to RPATH settings giving users freedom to use RPATH or LD_LIBRARY_PATH
or /etc/ld.so.conf.d/. CMAKE*RPATH* look like candidates for users to set
rather than projects themselves,
Hello,
On 2009 m. May 9 d., Saturday 13:57:59 Modestas Vainius wrote:
> But it is NOT kdelibs, it is EXPERIMENTAL kdelibs and nothing in kdelibs-
> experimental can depend on kdelibs (including buildsystem). Also please do
Sorry, messed up the sentence, should be "nothing in kdelibs ca
f. Quoting policy (please
respect it):
* kdelibs MUST NOT depend on anything in the experimental subdir
in other words, these two requirements are meant to put
kdelibs/experimental at the same build phase as extragear/libs currently is
--
Modestas Vainius
signature.asc
Description: This is a
ma.cmake also
> independently from kdelibs, so projects may include private copies of it in
> their sources.
There is no absolutely point in shipping any private stuff. Plasma headers
will be merged to kdelibs5-dev with the hope that they can be split off again
in KDE 4.3
--
Modestas Vainiu
dular, do not lose these
small bits which are already there (even they were not intentional).
--
Modestas Vainius
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-buildsystem@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
rg/?l=kde-core-devel&m=123001573422230
--
Modestas Vainius
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-buildsystem@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
hink that some
sort of freeze should apply to the build system too? There are numerous
packages which do find_package(Plasma) and will need to be fixed.
--
Modestas Vainius
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kd
s is a
lot worse (dependency mess) than this minor SC breakage which most projects
probably won't notice anyway since they fixed the issue long ago or have never
had it in the first place (e.g. target_link_libraries() was maintained
carefully).
--
Modestas Vainius
--- a/libs/kworkspace/C
nd based on the output
> from kde4-config, so they belong together.
FindKDE4Internal.cmake:
set (CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH `kde4-config --prefix`) ? (simplified version, with
kde4-config found the same way FindKDE4 did it)
find_package(foo)
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signa
ath to the configuration file is stored in the
cmake variable _CONFIG."
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-buildsystem
of those search paths in
find_package(), isn't it?
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-buildsystem@kde.org
https://mail.k
e)
> endif ()
I would suggest to put this into macro to enable unified generation of
configInstallDir for any project.
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-buil
Hello,
antradienis 09 Gruodis 2008, Alexander Neundorf rašė:
> So, you are right, ideally it should be under lib/ too.
> I'm just not sure if I should change that now.
In my opinion, while you are at it, do it now once and for all.
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
w I wish Alex could add support
for this path to KDE. /usr/lib/Kdepimlibs and /usr/lib/KDE4Workspace currently
contains only cmake stuff which are "found" via
cmake/modules/Find{Kdepimlibs,KDE4Workspace}.cmake anyway. So it is easy to
workaround lack of native cmake support for
y want find_package() to support /usr/lib/cmake search path as an
alternative search path. Please give distributors a choice.
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-b
workspace stuff are?
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-buildsystem@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
DE4_LIB_DIR}/KDE4Workspace/cmake )
replace with:
find_package(KDE4Workspace QUIET NO_MODULE PATHS ${PLUGIN_INSTALL_DIR}/cmake )
or ${KDE4_LIB_DIR}/cmakeconfigs or ${KDE4_LIB_DIR}/cmake whatever you choose.
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a
gt; put into libdir. These files are the cmake equivalent of .pc files, which
> also reside in /usr/lib.
Okay, but then I wouldn't mind e.g. /usr/lib/kde4/cmake or something similar,
just please do not pollute /usr/lib namespace directly. Likewise, pkg-config
has /usr/lib/pkgconfig.
r/share material
and we already have apps/cmake. Whats is wrong with placing those files to
e.g. kdelibs DATA/apps/cmake/configs (preserve the path the same way you
preserve KDElibs version and that's it) instead of such weird paths?
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.a
other prefix than
kdelibs?) so I attach a patch which removes it. Tested and works.
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/cmake/modules/FindKdepimLibs.cmake
+++ b/cmake/modules/FindKdepimLibs.cmake
@@ -56,19 +56,15 @@
if( KDEPIMLIBS_INCLUDE_DIR )
set(KDEPIMLIBS_FOUN
Hello,
šeštadienis 29 Lapkritis 2008, Alexander Neundorf rašė:
> Is this still necessary with the patch committed today by Gökcen Eraslan ?
I guess not.
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
Hello,
XINE_FOUND should be set before checking for XINE_XCB_FOUND. As it is now,
XINE_XCB will always be not found. Patch attached.
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- FindXine.cmake 2008-11-14 21:54:22.0 +0200
+++ FindXine.cmake 2008-11-28 21:13:44.0 +0200
@@
verything Qt/KDE based (99,99%) needs QtCore, as almost all KDE apps need
kdecore. That is not the case with QtDBus what you effectively state here.
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
pty -> kdecore
kutils -> kdeui
solid -> ${QT_QTCORE_LIBRARY}
${KJSEMBEDLIBNAME} -> "${KJSLIBNAME};${QT_QTCORE_LIBRARY}
I can prepare a patch with all these changes if you agree with them.
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Thi
atch in debian is a more
aggresive cleanup approach whereas 99th patch adds more "harmless" excess
linkage to increase compatibility.
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
B_EXPORT) or other
flag so lib export method can be chosen when building each app individually?
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-build
assuming that
they are available implicitly (which is really what you need to fix here).
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-buildsystem@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
ld be better spent supporting a proper solution as an alternative to have
it ready as default for KDE 4.2.
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-buildsystem@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
se the new way, so you can be sure it will be rock solid for KDE
4.2 on GNU/Linux.
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-buildsystem@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
an.org/svn/pkg-kde/branches/kde4/packages/kdelibs/debian/patches/98_link_interface_libraries.diff
3. http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=6846
4. http://www.vtk.org/Bug/view.php?id=3490
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
33 matches
Mail list logo