On Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2016 21:42:31 CET Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > In the past, the KDE usability team (namely Björn, Heiko and I) have at
> > least twice suggested to create a common vision for KDE's products.
> > This approach has received mostly negative comments every time, with the
> > a
On Friday 05 February 2016 08:20:22 Martin Graesslin wrote:
>
> Thus now my question: How will this vision provide us guidance for the next
> disruption? How will we be able to use this vision to be a leader in the
> next disruption? Please explain why you think that the vision will help in
> the
On Monday 08 February 2016 12:16:41 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Friday, February 05, 2016 05:00:28 PM Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> >
> > So, how about
> > "KDE enables everyone to control their digital life without compromising
> > their privacy."
>
> That's getting really catchy!
>
> Really useful f
> So a vision which would ensure that also future technologies could be served,
> would not harm that? Let's just not close doors.
Sure. But let's also not spread thin. Do you think it makes sense to
find a middle ground between two proposals?
___
kde-co
On Feb 10, 2016 10:01 PM, "Alexander Neundorf" wrote:
>
> So let's just assume Inkscape, since it was brought up here by Jos.
Clearly a
> GUI application, cross-platform and free. So far, clearly in. Our draft
says
> "familiar and consistent KDE user experience [...]. This is reached by
> followin
On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 23:03:47 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 23:15:21 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > I'll also start a new sub-thread.
> > Since this vision draft is very broad: what kind of projects do you
> > consider to be covered by this vision draft ?
> > Or,
On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 07:59:20 Clemens Toennies wrote:
...
> Provoking thought:
> With the recent shift of Gnome to exclusivity (leading to mint x-apps,
> ubuntu forks), what if more and more GTK applications would become KDE
> projects because of shared values inside an independent, welc
On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 23:55:59 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Dienstag, 9. Februar 2016 23:35:38 CET Alexander Neundorf wrote:
...
> > This is maybe an important detail.
> > The results of "Evolve KDE" (https://evolve.kde.org/surveyresults.pdf)
> > recommend to "Develop a vision, strategy and
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Feb 8, 2016 11:51, "Jonathan Riddell" wrote:
>
> I also heard a suggestion from Vishesh that projects like Amarok
> shouldn't be allowed in GSoC because they are not very active. It
> seems nonsense to block projects from having activity on grounds
On Feb 8, 2016 11:51, "Jonathan Riddell" wrote:
>
> I also heard a suggestion from Vishesh that projects like Amarok
> shouldn't be allowed in GSoC because they are not very active. It
> seems nonsense to block projects from having activity on grounds that
> they are not very active.
I stand by
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Jos Poortvliet wrote:
See my other, ridiculously long email about this. GNOME has a very different
philosophy. I agree with you that there are probably GTK based projects which
could fit just fine in KDE if we would be a bit less technology-focused.
Inkscape, for one, see
On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 7:59:20 AM BRST Clemens Toennies wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2016 11:42 PM, "Sebastian Kügler" wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 23:07:56 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 10:41:07 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > As Mart
12 matches
Mail list logo
