While I generally agree with your feeling that the feeling for IRC was a bit
negative, I disagree here:
Il 10 agosto 2017 22:34:19 EEST, Christian Loosli ha scritto:
>
>If people want to switch themselves: already possible, with or without
>this
>thread and the etherpad.
>
>The original topi
Il 10 agosto 2017 22:22:04 EEST, Thomas Pfeiffer ha
scritto:
>On Donnerstag, 10. August 2017 20:38:11 CEST Christian Loosli wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, 10. August 2017, 20:31:22 CEST schrieb Thomas
>Pfeiffer:
>> > On Donnerstag, 10. August 2017 18:40:34 CEST Christian Loosli
>wrote:
>> > > Am Donner
Hey Alberto,
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella <
es204904...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have created a Phabricator account, and now I'm able to login into:
> - (https://phabricator.kde.org)
> - (https://identity.kde.org)
> - (https://techbase.kde.org)
>
> But not into:
> - (http
Yep me here, I'm in the Kubuntu camp.
On Aug 10, 2017 7:39 PM, "Alberto Salvia Novella"
wrote:
> Aaron Honeycutt:
>
>> Odd I just logged in fine.
>>
>
> You here! Hahaha!
>
> Well, it seems I bricked the account somehow.
>
>
Aaron Honeycutt:
Odd I just logged in fine.
You here! Hahaha!
Well, it seems I bricked the account somehow.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Odd I just logged in fine.
On Aug 10, 2017 6:27 PM, "Alberto Salvia Novella"
wrote:
> I have created a Phabricator account, and now I'm able to login into:
> - (https://phabricator.kde.org)
> - (https://identity.kde.org)
> - (https://techbase.kde.org)
>
> But not into:
> - (https://community.kde
I have created a Phabricator account, and now I'm able to login into:
- (https://phabricator.kde.org)
- (https://identity.kde.org)
- (https://techbase.kde.org)
But not into:
- (https://community.kde.org)
Any idea how could I make it work? Thanks in advance 😉
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryp
On August 11, 2017 4:22:04 AM GMT+09:00, Thomas Pfeiffer
wrote:
>On Donnerstag, 10. August 2017 20:38:11 CEST Christian Loosli wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, 10. August 2017, 20:31:22 CEST schrieb Thomas
>Pfeiffer:
>> > On Donnerstag, 10. August 2017 18:40:34 CEST Christian Loosli
>wrote:
>> > > Am Don
Am Donnerstag, 10. August 2017, 21:22:04 CEST schrieb Thomas Pfeiffer:
> On Donnerstag, 10. August 2017 20:38:11 CEST Christian Loosli wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 10. August 2017, 20:31:22 CEST schrieb Thomas Pfeiffer:
> > > On Donnerstag, 10. August 2017 18:40:34 CEST Christian Loosli wrote:
> > > >
On Donnerstag, 10. August 2017 20:38:11 CEST Christian Loosli wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 10. August 2017, 20:31:22 CEST schrieb Thomas Pfeiffer:
> > On Donnerstag, 10. August 2017 18:40:34 CEST Christian Loosli wrote:
> > > Am Donnerstag, 10. August 2017, 17:25:14 CEST schrieb Jonathan Riddell:
> > >
Am Donnerstag, 10. August 2017, 20:31:22 CEST schrieb Thomas Pfeiffer:
> On Donnerstag, 10. August 2017 18:40:34 CEST Christian Loosli wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 10. August 2017, 17:25:14 CEST schrieb Jonathan Riddell:
> > > LibreOffice are having a similar discussion
> > >
> > > https://listarchiv
On Donnerstag, 10. August 2017 18:40:34 CEST Christian Loosli wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 10. August 2017, 17:25:14 CEST schrieb Jonathan Riddell:
> > LibreOffice are having a similar discussion
> >
> > https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/projects/msg02257.html
> >
> > They want to continue u
Martin Klapetek - 10.08.17, 12:34:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Martin Steigerwald
> wrote:
> > Martin Klapetek - 09.08.17, 16:12:
> > > > But KDE is not a tech startup. As people correctly wrote, KDE has a
> > > > very
> > > > long
> > > > history and contributors of all age. I'd rather be
Am Donnerstag, 10. August 2017, 17:25:14 CEST schrieb Jonathan Riddell:
> LibreOffice are having a similar discussion
>
> https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/projects/msg02257.html
>
> They want to continue using IRC though which means fragmentation would
> continue.
Maybe someone should
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Martin Steigerwald
wrote:
> Martin Klapetek - 09.08.17, 16:12:
> > > But KDE is not a tech startup. As people correctly wrote, KDE has a
> very
> > > long
> > > history and contributors of all age. I'd rather be that than one of the
> > > many
> > > tech startups
LibreOffice are having a similar discussion
https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/projects/msg02257.html
They want to continue using IRC though which means fragmentation would continue.
They find rocket.chat to have some limitations including that the
clients aren't as bug free as they oug
> On 10 Aug 2017, at 15:27, Marco Martin wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>> You can't expect me to read a 200 messages backlog in 20 channels just in
>> case
>> something important was said while i was away.
>>
>> Also one of the reasons of why i hate to us
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> You can't expect me to read a 200 messages backlog in 20 channels just in case
> something important was said while i was away.
>
> Also one of the reasons of why i hate to use Telegram for anything that
> "actually matters" is this "alway
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> Perhaps we should ask sitter what kinds of scratch repo's those were, and
> whether he would have created them on KDE infra, if there was a similarly
> simple one-click way to create scratch repo's.
- experimental snap build tooling for
Op donderdag 10 augustus 2017 11:06:21 CEST schreef Adriaan de Groot:
> On Thursday 10 August 2017 10:45:14 Harald Sitter wrote:
> > Seems to me y'all aren't appreciating that I am telling you my point
> > of view. I have created some 20 repos on github last year and 0
> > scratch repos on our infr
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 08:51:53PM +0200, Christian Loosli wrote:
> Then, on the subject of emojis, stickers or even the protocol used being so
> important:
>
> Let's see what others do.
My proposal is to lead rather than follow others. We can learn from their
experience but leading would be
> What I’ve argued strongly against is the standpoint that we should stick
> with the status quo.
The status quo _is_ things with the advantages of Telegram or Matrix
available, since these two are already bridged.
Hence my earlier
> Last but not least: if IRC really is so much of an issue, w
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 09:24:08AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> *Either* IRC and nothing else *or* something new and nothing else.
>
> Seriously?
>
> I mean: Seriously?
I'm always serious :)
But sure it's a long shot and I never expected it to happen, but I thought I'd
try.
Moving whole
On Thursday 10 August 2017 10:57:29 Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> This is a microcosm, a textbook example, a beautiful illustration of
> exactly what the culture-worries in the IM thread are about
Perhaps to clarify: the above is a philosophical point (see what happens when
you start messing around
> On 10 Aug 2017, at 10:22, Luigi Toscano wrote:
>
> Il 10 agosto 2017 10:24:08 EEST, Martin Steigerwald ha
> scritto:
>> Martin Klapetek - 09.08.17, 16:12:
But KDE is not a tech startup. As people correctly wrote, KDE has a
>> very
long
history and contributors of all age. I'd
On Thursday 10 August 2017 10:45:14 Harald Sitter wrote:
> Seems to me y'all aren't appreciating that I am telling you my point
> of view. I have created some 20 repos on github last year and 0
> scratch repos on our infrastructure. I thought you might want to know
> why. Feel free to find my reaso
On Thursday 10 August 2017 00:15:21 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> Just in case my other email linking to the Etherpad was overlooked by some
> of you because it was buried too deep in the thread:
>
> Let's make this discussion productive by collecting the requirements KDE has
> for a chat / IM system t
Il 10 agosto 2017 11:45:14 EEST, Harald Sitter ha scritto:
>Seems to me y'all aren't appreciating that I am telling you my point
>of view.
One thing is say "adding an easier workflow for scratch repo to our infra is
much required for this and that", which I can agree too; another is going
str
Seems to me y'all aren't appreciating that I am telling you my point
of view. I have created some 20 repos on github last year and 0
scratch repos on our infrastructure. I thought you might want to know
why. Feel free to find my reasons silly, that doesn't change them
though.
I am did not mean to
Il 10 agosto 2017 10:24:08 EEST, Martin Steigerwald ha
scritto:
>Martin Klapetek - 09.08.17, 16:12:
>> > But KDE is not a tech startup. As people correctly wrote, KDE has a
>very
>> > long
>> > history and contributors of all age. I'd rather be that than one of
>the
>> > many
>> > tech startups w
Il 10 agosto 2017 10:02:43 EEST, Harald Sitter ha scritto:
>I for one would pick the alternative which is not using our
>infrastructure and instead click two buttons so I don't have to file
>paperwork manually nor have to wait for said paperwork to get faxed to
>HQ for approval. i.e. not waiting t
On 08/09/2017 07:19 AM, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> Must-have:
- dfaure is there so I can ask KIO questions
(IRC fails that currently.)
Cheers,
Eike
Thomas Pfeiffer - 10.08.17, 00:15:
> Just in case my other email linking to the Etherpad was overlooked by some
> of you because it was buried too deep in the thread:
>
> Let's make this discussion productive by collecting the requirements KDE has
> for a chat / IM system to become our standard in
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Harald Sitter wrote:
> I for one would pick the alternative which is not using our
> infrastructure and instead click two buttons so I don't have to file
> paperwork manually nor have to wait for said paperwork to get faxed to
> HQ for approval. i.e. not waiting tr
Christian Loosli - 09.08.17, 22:26:
> > Who's going to pick all those projects up after them? I'd like
> > to think that young enthusiasts with lots of energy and potential,
> > exactly what those heroes starting the original KDE were.
>
> Who is going to be there for these new talents that lack e
Martin Klapetek - 09.08.17, 16:12:
> > But KDE is not a tech startup. As people correctly wrote, KDE has a very
> > long
> > history and contributors of all age. I'd rather be that than one of the
> > many
> > tech startups with a bunch of little to no experience but fancy new chat
> > systems, to
I for one would pick the alternative which is not using our
infrastructure and instead click two buttons so I don't have to file
paperwork manually nor have to wait for said paperwork to get faxed to
HQ for approval. i.e. not waiting trumps waiting in my world.
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Albe
37 matches
Mail list logo