Re: Extending the license policy to include Apache-2.0

2021-09-15 Thread Luigi Toscano
Alexander Potashev ha scritto: > Hi, > > Parts of https://invent.kde.org/websites/aether-sass/ are licensed > under Apache License 2.0. This disagrees with the KDE licensing > policy. > > Considering Apache-2.0 is similar to MIT, I don't see why it shouldn't > be allowed by the policy. Is anyone

Re: Extending the license policy to include Apache-2.0

2021-09-15 Thread Carl Schwan
Le mercredi 15 septembre 2021 à 9:42 PM, Alexander Potashev a écrit : > Hi, > Parts of https://invent.kde.org/websites/aether-sass/ are licensed > under Apache License 2.0. This disagrees with the KDE licensing > policy. > > Considering Apache-2.0 is similar to MIT, I don't see why it shouldn't

Extending the license policy to include Apache-2.0

2021-09-15 Thread Alexander Potashev
Hi, Parts of https://invent.kde.org/websites/aether-sass/ are licensed under Apache License 2.0. This disagrees with the KDE licensing policy. Considering Apache-2.0 is similar to MIT, I don't see why it shouldn't be allowed by the policy. Is anyone aware of past discussions of the KDE licensing

Re: Extending the license policy to include ODbL-1.0

2021-09-15 Thread Andreas Cord-Landwehr
On Mittwoch, 15. September 2021 17:34:00 CEST Harald Sitter wrote: > +1 +1 also from me! I think this license fits well into our approved license landscape and should not make any issues regarding code/data portability between the different KDE projects. Cheers, Andreas

Re: Extending the license policy to include ODbL-1.0

2021-09-15 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 17:26:57 +0200 Volker Krause wrote: > Hi, > > there's a MR [1] for ki18n containing data tables generated from OSM data, > which implies the ODbL-1.0 license [2]. We also already have other places > ([3], [4]) actually doing this. > > However that's a license not yet cover

Re: Extending the license policy to include ODbL-1.0

2021-09-15 Thread Harald Sitter
+1 On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 5:27 PM Volker Krause wrote: > > Hi, > > there's a MR [1] for ki18n containing data tables generated from OSM data, > which implies the ODbL-1.0 license [2]. We also already have other places > ([3], [4]) actually doing this. > > However that's a license not yet covered

Extending the license policy to include ODbL-1.0

2021-09-15 Thread Volker Krause
Hi, there's a MR [1] for ki18n containing data tables generated from OSM data, which implies the ODbL-1.0 license [2]. We also already have other places ([3], [4]) actually doing this. However that's a license not yet covered by our license policy, so I suggest we add it. ODbL is essentially