Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE

2017-08-17 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
Hi everyone, I've finally managed to enter all of our proposed requirements for a KDE-wide primary IM/chat solution into a tool for creating Kano surveys: http://www.kanosurvey.com/?id=3959 The Kano model [1] categorizes features not just in "must have" and "nice to have" but into five categori

Re: Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE

2017-08-17 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > Hi everyone, > I've finally managed to enter all of our proposed requirements for a KDE-wide > primary IM/chat solution into a tool for creating Kano surveys: > > http://www.kanosurvey.com/?id=3959 > > The Kano model [1] categorizes features not jus

Re: Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE

2017-08-18 Thread Mirko Boehm (KDE)
Hi, > On 18. Aug 2017, at 02:11, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > I've finally managed to enter all of our proposed requirements for a KDE-wide > primary IM/chat solution into a tool for creating Kano surveys: > > http://www.kanosurvey.com/?id=3959 > > The Kano

Re: Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE

2017-08-18 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
Now in the right thread: I actually think I missed two things that would be important to me: * no logging: it should be possible to have no public logs of a channel * per-channel nicks: to avoid people joining in getting renamed to Guest On Fri, 18 Aug 2017, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Fri

Re: Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE

2017-08-18 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
>> >> The Kano model [1] categorizes features not just in "must have" and "nice to >> have" but into five categories along two dimensions. >> This results in a more holistic view on the requirements, at the expense of >> making the survey quite long because participants have to rate each feature

Re: Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE

2017-08-25 Thread Kenny Duffus
On Friday, 18 August 2017 01:11:39 BST Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > Hi everyone, > I've finally managed to enter all of our proposed requirements for a > KDE-wide primary IM/chat solution into a tool for creating Kano > surveys: > > http://www.kanosurvey.com/?id=3959 > Do you have a planned "closing

Re: Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE

2017-08-28 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On Freitag, 25. August 2017 12:46:16 CEST Kenny Duffus wrote: > On Friday, 18 August 2017 01:11:39 BST Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I've finally managed to enter all of our proposed requirements for a > > KDE-wide primary IM/chat solution into a tool for creating Kano > > surveys: >

Re: Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE

2017-09-04 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
Here are the results of the survey: https://sessellift.wordpress.com/2017/09/05/results-of-the-requirements-survey-for-a-kde-wide-chat-solution/ Now it's time for us to find a solution that fits the profile! Cheers, Thomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE

2017-09-04 Thread Eike Hein
On September 5, 2017 8:15:47 AM GMT+09:00, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: >Here are the results of the survey: >https://sessellift.wordpress.com/2017/09/05/results-of-the-requirements-survey-for-a-kde-wide-chat-solution/ >Now it's time for us to find a solution that fits the profile! >Cheers, >Thomas Hi

Fwd: Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE

2017-09-05 Thread argonel
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Eike Hein wrote: > On September 5, 2017 8:15:47 AM GMT+09:00, Thomas Pfeiffer > wrote: >>Here are the results of the survey: >>https://sessellift.wordpress.com/2017/09/05/results-of-the-requirements-survey-for-a-kde-wide-chat-solution/ >>Now it's time for us to fi

Re: Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE

2017-09-05 Thread Christian Loosli
Hi Thomas, all, First of all: thanks for putting the survey up. I think the idea of matching these to protocols in a wiki is also good, and I can gladly help with the IRC part. As a wiki is more a binary (or trinary, in this case) thing I shall give a bit of a longer read on the points here:

Re: Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE

2017-09-05 Thread Eike Hein
On 09/05/2017 08:15 AM, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > Here are the results of the survey: > https://sessellift.wordpress.com/2017/09/05/results-of-the-requirements-survey-for-a-kde-wide-chat-solution/ > Now it's time for us to find a solution that fits the profile! Here's some thoughts from the Konve

Re: Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE

2017-09-07 Thread Jos van den Oever
Op vrijdag 18 augustus 2017 02:11:39 CEST schreef Thomas Pfeiffer: > Hi everyone, > I've finally managed to enter all of our proposed requirements for a > KDE-wide primary IM/chat solution into a tool for creating Kano surveys: > > http://www.kanosurvey.com/?id=3959 > > The Kano model [1] categor