Re: Review Request 115864: kio_http: fixes for 30X response code redirection handling

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115864/#review50189 --- Did you abandon the original change you proposed on purpose?

Re: Review Request 115864: kio_http: fixes for 30X response code redirection handling

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115864/#review50188 --- kioslave/http/http.cpp

Re: Review Request 112294: Implement multi-seat support in KDM

> On Sept. 3, 2013, 10:20 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > given that there is no intention to make further feature releases of the > > kde workspace which will include kdm, i wonder why we'd go through the > > (potentially tedious) process of upstreaming this now? > > Stefan Brüns wrote: >

Last chance ;-). And some more information.

As my questionnaire [1] is now open for two weeks I plan to give it another 24 hours and then close it. So you’ve still time till tomorrow, Wednesday, February 19, 23.59 UTC to fill in the survey and participate in the draw. If you should need more time or planned to fill in the questionnaire [1

Re: Review Request 112294: Implement multi-seat support in KDM

> On Sept. 3, 2013, 10:20 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > given that there is no intention to make further feature releases of the > > kde workspace which will include kdm, i wonder why we'd go through the > > (potentially tedious) process of upstreaming this now? > > Stefan Brüns wrote: >

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w8

Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 8 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, alexmerry, dfaure, mck182, mgraesslin, sebas, svuorela, teo, tosky and myself. Announcement: * Alpha 1 is out; * Get ready for alpha 2 end of next

Re: KDM + ConsoleKit + Logind

On Monday, February 17, 2014 14:49:07 Harald Sitter wrote: > I mean, it's a crappy situation either way. The DM we ship with our Well, let’s get https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112294/ into the 4.11 branch of kde-workspace and then it is resolved. If downstreams are already shipping it success

Re: Review Request 112294: Implement multi-seat support in KDM

> On Sept. 3, 2013, 10:20 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > given that there is no intention to make further feature releases of the > > kde workspace which will include kdm, i wonder why we'd go through the > > (potentially tedious) process of upstreaming this now? > > Stefan Brüns wrote: >

Re: Review Request 115695: Rework KNotification to work without KNotify daemon

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115695/#review50136 --- Ping, any comments? - Martin Klapetek On Feb. 13, 2014, 11:

Re: KDM + ConsoleKit + Logind

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Harald Sitter wrote: > >> Right, but short of patching KDM to gain proper logind support, should >> one build with or without CK, > > build without it. > >> i.e. does CK add anything useful if the >> rest of the system is not using it anyway > >

Review Request 115864: kio_http: fixes for 30X response code redirection handling

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115864/ --- Review request for kdelibs and Dawit Alemayehu. Repository: kdelibs Des

Re: KDM + ConsoleKit + Logind

On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:49:07 +0100, Harald Sitter wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Matthias Klumpp wrote: 2014-02-17 13:55 GMT+01:00 Lukáš Tinkl : Dne 17.2.2014 11:51, Harald Sitter napsal(a): Ahoys I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a system is using L

Re: KDM + ConsoleKit + Logind

On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:51:33 +0100, Harald Sitter wrote: Ahoys I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a system is using Logind I guess KDM+CK doesn't do much useful, so the question arose whether distributions with such a lineup should build without CK support. In short