Hi Jeremy,
On 27/02/2015, at 2:03 PM, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> Yeah, obviously to share with all users installing data files into
> /Library/Application Support/ is better, I just didn't do that in my test
> since my user doesn't own that folder and I didn't want to install with sudo
> for a tes
El Divendres, 27 de febrer de 2015, a les 12:36:21, Martin Klapetek va
escriure:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > So we still need a KPeople release, which is still in playground so noone
> > has
> > properly reviewed it, and you want to speed-turn it into a framewo
On Friday 27 February 2015 13:29:59 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> > > 3. Use absolute paths for KDE_INSTALL_DATADIR everywhere and remove
> > > ${PACKAGE_PREFIX_PATH} completely.
> >
> > There is KDE_INSTALL_FULL_DATADIR, which is absolute. However, that
> > removes
> > the relocatability of the package
Alex,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Alex Merry wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 February 2015 19:10:08 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> > One issue I found however is that some frameworks (maybe all?) have a
> > KF5FooConfig.cmake.in with ${PACKAGE_PREFIX_PATH}/@KDE_INSTALL_DATADIR@
> in
> > them to specify w
Forwarding to kde-licensing, which is the proper venue for this. Please keep
any further discussion there.
On Friday 27 February 2015 17:41:01 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm forwarding message from Daniel. What is license of KDE icons?
> Can we do something with (possible) GPL violation?
>
> On Feb. 25, 2015, 5:57 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > I "think" this is OK, but just don't know.
> >
> > Anyway, your diff is for kdelibs (KDE SC 4.xx). I don't know if that gets
> > another release. Either way, KIO frameworks [1] is where this should be
> > applied to when you get a ship it.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Aleix Pol wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to submit KPeople for review process so it can join the
> KF5 family in the next 5.8 release.
>
> KPeople is a tier 3 framework (because of KService, which will be
> dropped eventually, without breaking ABI) and it offers cross
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>
> So we still need a KPeople release, which is still in playground so noone
> has
> properly reviewed it, and you want to speed-turn it into a frameworks in 1
> day. Do you actually have anyone to review it in such notice? At least
> san
On Wednesday 25 February 2015 19:10:08 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> One issue I found however is that some frameworks (maybe all?) have a
> KF5FooConfig.cmake.in with ${PACKAGE_PREFIX_PATH}/@KDE_INSTALL_DATADIR@ in
> them to specify where to find the data files. On my OS X install that was
> getting fil
