> On June 21, 2012, 10:05 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > I don't really know if we should do this.. I do understand why you want to
> > rename it. From a user point of view the user probably wants to either
> > access windows shares or make shares accessible for windows. Either way,
> > it's don
> On June 21, 2012, 10:05 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > I don't really know if we should do this.. I do understand why you want to
> > rename it. From a user point of view the user probably wants to either
> > access windows shares or make shares accessible for windows. Either way,
> > it's don
> On June 21, 2012, 10:05 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > I don't really know if we should do this.. I do understand why you want to
> > rename it. From a user point of view the user probably wants to either
> > access windows shares or make shares accessible for windows. Either way,
> > it's don
Just let me add my 2 cents to the discussion saying that whatever name you
are going to choose here, it should be non technical at all from the user
POV.
So, please let "samba", "smb" or similar out of it. "Windows" is
borderline. My mother knows that it is referred to something computer
related. :
My mother however thinks about a certain latin dance when I tell her
to 'use the samba share'.
My mother however thinks about certain holes in the walls of her home
when I
tell her to 'use the windows share'.
Windows itself refers to this by "network share", I think.
However, what I was wond
Hi,
On Friday 22 June 2012 03:24:47 Maarten De Meyer wrote:
...
> My mother however thinks about a certain latin dance when I tell her
> to 'use the samba share'.
My mother however thinks about certain holes in the walls of her home when I
tell her to 'use the windows share'.
SCNR.
--
Rega
> On June 21, 2012, 10:05 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > I don't really know if we should do this.. I do understand why you want to
> > rename it. From a user point of view the user probably wants to either
> > access windows shares or make shares accessible for windows. Either way,
> > it's don
> On June 21, 2012, 10:05 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > I don't really know if we should do this.. I do understand why you want to
> > rename it. From a user point of view the user probably wants to either
> > access windows shares or make shares accessible for windows. Either way,
> > it's don
> On June 21, 2012, 10:05 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > I don't really know if we should do this.. I do understand why you want to
> > rename it. From a user point of view the user probably wants to either
> > access windows shares or make shares accessible for windows. Either way,
> > it's don
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105318/
---
Review request for KDE Runtime and David Edmundson.
Description
---
F
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105318/#review14969
---
I don't really know if we should do this.. I do understand why
11 matches
Mail list logo
