---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114999/
---
(Updated Jan. 16, 2014, 6:06 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been di
> On Jan. 14, 2014, 7:22 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > like with the other patch I'm not sure whether that's a good idea as that
> > breaks any communication with the kdelibs4.
>
> Thomas Lübking wrote:
> is there a functional incompitibility between SC4 and KF5 that requires
> such disa
> On Jan. 14, 2014, 8:22 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > like with the other patch I'm not sure whether that's a good idea as that
> > breaks any communication with the kdelibs4.
>
> Thomas Lübking wrote:
> is there a functional incompitibility between SC4 and KF5 that requires
> such disa
> On Jan. 14, 2014, 7:22 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > like with the other patch I'm not sure whether that's a good idea as that
> > breaks any communication with the kdelibs4.
is there a functional incompitibility between SC4 and KF5 that requires such
disambiguation or is this merely a pac
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114999/#review47390
---
like with the other patch I'm not sure whether that's a good i
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114999/
---
(Updated Jan. 14, 2014, 3:21 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime, David
