On Monday, May 16, 2011 01:36:56 am johnmS2 wrote:
> On 05/15/2011 10:54 AM, todd rme wrote:
> > game board unless the game specifically calls for dragging). I would
> > hardly call that a "mess".
> >
> > So far, the complaints are mostly hypothetical. But in practice it
> > isn't a major issue.
On 05/15/2011 10:54 AM, todd rme wrote:
> game board unless the game specifically calls for dragging). I would
> hardly call that a "mess".
>
> So far, the complaints are mostly hypothetical. But in practice it
> isn't a major issue.
>
> -Todd
Hi!
Ok then +1 real world complaints:
I as a use
On 15.05.11 19:52:59, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 05/15/2011 04:03 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:43:45 Michael Jansen wrote:
> >> On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:04:34 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> >>> On Sunday 15 May 2011 13:36:14 Luciano Montanaro wrote:
> A feature like this
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Michael Jansen wrote:
> On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:54:27 todd rme wrote:
>>
>> What mess? So far we know of one application that is affected by this
>> in a negative manner, and the developer already plans to fix it. Then
>> we have some minor consistency issues, a
On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:54:27 todd rme wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > A Sunday, May 15, 2011, Nikos Chantziaras va escriure:
> >> No. That would mean that many applications would not be draggable,
> >> since their creators never tested, don't know, or don
Cocoa has the same behaviour afaik, if it does then Qt developers targeting
multiplatform should be aware of this (documentation issue).
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
On Sunday, May 15, 2011 02:54:27 PM todd rme wrote:
> So far, the complaints are mostly hypothetical. But in practice it
> isn't a major issue.
I'd like to add that as an user, I love the dragging feature, so is a small
price to pay.
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Sunday, May 15, 2011, Nikos Chantziaras va escriure:
>> No. That would mean that many applications would not be draggable,
>> since their creators never tested, don't know, or don't care about KDE.
>> The result: an inconsistent mes
A Sunday, May 15, 2011, Nikos Chantziaras va escriure:
> On 05/15/2011 04:03 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:43:45 Michael Jansen wrote:
> >> On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:04:34 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> >>> On Sunday 15 May 2011 13:36:14 Luciano Montanaro wrote:
> A feature li
On Sunday 15 May 2011 17:52:59 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 05/15/2011 04:03 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:43:45 Michael Jansen wrote:
> >> On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:04:34 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> >>> On Sunday 15 May 2011 13:36:14 Luciano Montanaro wrote:
> A feature l
On 05/15/2011 07:45 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Sunday, May 15, 2011, Nikos Chantziaras va escriure:
>> On 05/15/2011 04:35 PM, Luciano Montanaro wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Hugo Pereira Da Costa
>>>
>>>wrote:
For the record, and as a last resort, I also added to oxyge
On 05/15/2011 04:03 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:43:45 Michael Jansen wrote:
>> On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:04:34 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>>> On Sunday 15 May 2011 13:36:14 Luciano Montanaro wrote:
A feature like this should not be implemented in a style, IMHO, styles
s
A Sunday, May 15, 2011, Nikos Chantziaras va escriure:
> On 05/15/2011 04:35 PM, Luciano Montanaro wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Hugo Pereira Da Costa
> >
> > wrote:
> >> For the record, and as a last resort, I also added to oxygen a cusom
> >> QObject
> >>
> >> property that forc
On 05/15/2011 04:35 PM, Luciano Montanaro wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Hugo Pereira Da Costa
> wrote:
>
>>
>> For the record, and as a last resort, I also added to oxygen a cusom QObject
>> property that force disabling of the window dragging. Namely if you add:
>>
>>widget->setP
A Sunday, May 15, 2011, Dominik Haumann va escriure:
> Hi,
>
> in Kate, we create our Highlighting and Indentation menus on the fly, i.e.
> by using the signal aboutToShow(). We use this signal to avoid creating
> unneccesarily lots of menu items that may never be visible, i.e. kind of a
> lazy lo
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Hugo Pereira Da Costa
wrote:
>
> For the record, and as a last resort, I also added to oxygen a cusom QObject
> property that force disabling of the window dragging. Namely if you add:
>
> widget->setProperty( " _kde_no_window_grab", false );
>
> you achieve the
On Sunday 15 May 2011 15:03:30 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:43:45 Michael Jansen wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:04:34 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > > On Sunday 15 May 2011 13:36:14 Luciano Montanaro wrote:
> > > > A feature like this should not be implemented in a style, IMHO,
A Sunday, May 15, 2011, Martin Gräßlin va escriure:
> On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:43:45 Michael Jansen wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:04:34 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > > On Sunday 15 May 2011 13:36:14 Luciano Montanaro wrote:
> > > > A feature like this should not be implemented in a style, IMHO,
>
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Sunday 15 May 2011 13:36:14 Luciano Montanaro wrote:
>> A feature like this should not be implemented in a style, IMHO, styles
>> should be limited to changing the look, not the behaviour of widgets,
>> and for sure it should not be the d
On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:43:45 Michael Jansen wrote:
> On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:04:34 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 May 2011 13:36:14 Luciano Montanaro wrote:
> > > A feature like this should not be implemented in a style, IMHO, styles
> > > should be limited to changing the look, not the
A Sunday, May 15, 2011, Martin Gräßlin va escriure:
> On Sunday 15 May 2011 13:36:14 Luciano Montanaro wrote:
> > A feature like this should not be implemented in a style, IMHO, styles
> > should be limited to changing the look, not the behaviour of widgets,
> > and for sure it should not be the de
On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:04:34 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Sunday 15 May 2011 13:36:14 Luciano Montanaro wrote:
> > A feature like this should not be implemented in a style, IMHO, styles
> > should be limited to changing the look, not the behaviour of widgets,
> > and for sure it should not be the d
On Sunday 15 May 2011 13:36:14 Luciano Montanaro wrote:
> A feature like this should not be implemented in a style, IMHO, styles
> should be limited to changing the look, not the behaviour of widgets,
> and for sure it should not be the default behaviour.
you are fighting windmills here. Reality is
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:07 AM, todd rme wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Michael Jansen
> wrote:
>> That is really great guys. But look at the mail from todd. 26 Games reveice
>> bugs because of that feature? 26! And you guys still consider this a FEATURE?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>
> For most g
A Sunday, May 15, 2011, todd rme va escriure:
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Michael Jansen
wrote:
> > That is really great guys. But look at the mail from todd. 26 Games
> > reveice bugs because of that feature? 26! And you guys still consider
> > this a FEATURE?
> >
> > Mike
>
> For most
Hi Anthony,
On Thursday, 2011-05-12, Anthony Gabrielson wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been looking through the kdepim source for the kmail layouts and
> I'm
> having a tough time finding it. If anyone has any ideas I would
> appreciate a pointer.
If you mean layout in sense of how the different
Hi,
in Kate, we create our Highlighting and Indentation menus on the fly, i.e.
by using the signal aboutToShow(). We use this signal to avoid creating
unneccesarily lots of menu items that may never be visible, i.e. kind of a
lazy loading mechanism.
We fill the menu by naming menu items: "&" +
27 matches
Mail list logo
