Hi,
there is a bug, and a fix available but the maintainer won't fix it
due personal issues
I have asked him kindly at least several times even before
participating in bugzilla to fix this issue, that's why I'm not
friendly at all to that guy anymore.
The bug is even caused by him.
The fix is a
Hi,
I had the tedious reading of the bug report and IMHO it's a
valid WONTFIX, if I were the maintainer I wouldn't fix.
The maintainer is going to DROP that code to rely on the work
of another library, so why fixing it?
I might agree that the patch looks simple and doesn't looks like
it's going
For reference, https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365083#c11 lists purely
technical issues with the proposed approach, and that serves as valid
(technical) reasons for not accepting the proposed patch.
2016-08-10 21:14 GMT+03:00 Daniel Nicoletti :
> Hi,
>
> I had the tedious reading of the bug
Some people are using that and the patch obviously is a FIX.
It has been mentioned that it will take weeks until the proposed way
would be available.
Until then the code in question is uninitialized.
There is absolutely no reason to not fix it.
This code has been unmaintained for years but it is
2016-08-10 15:42 GMT-03:00 Markus Rechberger :
> Some people are using that and the patch obviously is a FIX.
>
> It has been mentioned that it will take weeks until the proposed way
> would be available.
> Until then the code in question is uninitialized.
You are a company, help this get's finish
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> 2016-08-10 15:42 GMT-03:00 Markus Rechberger :
>> Some people are using that and the patch obviously is a FIX.
>>
>> It has been mentioned that it will take weeks until the proposed way
>> would be available.
>> Until then the code in ques
Markus,
On woensdag 10 augustus 2016 21:30:58 CEST Markus Rechberger wrote:
> Don't expect me to be friendly to anyone supporting breaking working
> applications, only idiots do that and fully accept that.
I think we've seen enough of you. I have told you, repeatedly, on IRC that
your disagreeme
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Markus,
>
> On woensdag 10 augustus 2016 21:30:58 CEST Markus Rechberger wrote:
>> Don't expect me to be friendly to anyone supporting breaking working
>> applications, only idiots do that and fully accept that.
>
> I think we've seen eno
