Hey Alexander,
> Sorry for causing the extra work!
Everything is fine, wasn't too hard ;-) And, as said, KSaneCore is of course
the way to go. So, sooner or later, I would have ported my stuff anyway.
> Since the KSaneCore interface inside libksane was never publicly announced,
> Kåre and I
Hello Tobias,
I would like to add some explanations as it was me doing this :)
Sorry for causing the extra work!
On Thursday, 29 September 2022 13:19:37 CEST Tobias Leupold wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 29. September 2022, 12:09:10 CEST schrieb Christophe
> Giboudeaux:
> > libksane is still needed
Am 29.09.22 um 16:10 schrieb Ahmad Samir:
On 29/9/22 10:22, Tobias Leupold wrote:
Hi all!
I recently had to port Scandoc from libksane to KSaneCore, and now, I
have
questions ;-)
Question 1:
On Gentoo, we have libksane 22.04.3 (stable) and 22.08.1 (testing). On an
Artix machine I run,
On 29/9/22 10:22, Tobias Leupold wrote:
Hi all!
I recently had to port Scandoc from libksane to KSaneCore, and now, I have
questions ;-)
Question 1:
On Gentoo, we have libksane 22.04.3 (stable) and 22.08.1 (testing). On an
Artix machine I run, there's only 22.08.1 (those guys are even more
Am Donnerstag, 29. September 2022, 12:09:10 CEST schrieb Christophe
Giboudeaux:
> libksane is still needed by a couple applications:
> https://lxr.kde.org/search?%21v=kf5-qt5&_filestring=&_string=KF5%3A%3ASane
Yeah, sure, Scandoc was one of those -- but the problem is that on can't build
the
Hello,
On jeudi 29 septembre 2022 10:22:19 CEST Tobias Leupold wrote:
>
> So what's the rationale behind still releasing libksane, when it can't be
> used anymore, and one has to port one's code to KSaneCore anyway?
>
libksane is still needed by a couple applications:
