Chusslove Illich wrote:
[: Stephen Kelly :]
If such calls are generated by uic, then that is a bug in Qt (which
should have been reported years ago), and should be fixed in Qt, right?
Maybe, I'm not sure of the conventions of Qt Linguist.
I created a .ui file with a QLabel with an empty
See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_frameworks_qt5/1692/changes
Changes:
[steveire] Add missing file.
--
[...truncated 3843 lines...]
[ 24%] Building CXX object
tier3/kservice/src/CMakeFiles/KService.dir/sycoca/ksycocadict.cpp.o
[ 25%] Building CXX
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113685/
---
(Updated Nov. 18, 2013, 8:44 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_frameworks_qt5/1693/changes
Changes:
[mgraesslin] New KColorSchemeManager to support changing color scheme in app
--
[...truncated 4763 lines...]
[ 48%] Built target fixx11h_test
[ 48%] Building CXX object
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113685/#review43872
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112755/
---
(Updated Nov. 18, 2013, 8:58 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_frameworks_qt5/1694/
--
[...truncated 4642 lines...]
Scanning dependencies of target kdirwatchtest_gui
[ 41%] Building CXX object
tier1/kcoreaddons/tests/CMakeFiles/kdirwatchtest_gui.dir/kdirwatchtest_gui.cpp.o
Scanning
See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_frameworks_qt5/1695/changes
Changes:
[mgraesslin] Reimplement KXUtils::createPixmapFromHandle with XCB
--
[...truncated 3844 lines...]
[ 36%] [ 36%] Building CXX object
On Nov. 15, 2013, 7:42 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
tier3/kconfigwidgets/src/kcolorschememanager.cpp, line 124
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113685/diff/3/?file=213999#file213999line124
Would make sense to change the lambda so that you'd pass 16 and 24
instead. It feels kinda
On Monday 18 November 2013 Nov 09:17:07 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
So you're saying Boud's and Christoph comments are wrong?
My comment was meant to convey that color palettes have nothing to do with this
patch -- they're a red herring here.
--
Boudewijn Rempt
http://www.valdyas.org,
On Nov. 15, 2013, 8:42 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
tier3/kconfigwidgets/src/kcolorschememanager.cpp, line 124
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113685/diff/3/?file=213999#file213999line124
Would make sense to change the lambda so that you'd pass 16 and 24
instead. It feels kinda
See http://build.kde.org/job/plasma-framework_master_qt5/906/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
On Sunday 17 November 2013 18:53:36 Stephen Kelly wrote:
Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Friday 15 November 2013 16:28:10 Stephen Kelly wrote:
Aleix Pol wrote:
I see that Stephen Kelly has been doing some work on Qt and cmake to
make it possible to integrate these properly, but also those
See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_frameworks_qt5/1696/changes
Changes:
[agateau] Hackish fix for build failure in kde-runtime
--
[...truncated 3943 lines...]
[ 32%] Building CXX object
Stephen Kelly wrote:
It'd need to be released quite a bit before us to
be something we can consider as a dependency. At that point I'm
considering having 2.8.12 as dependency for the release (so that it got
time to spread, sounds less likely with CMake 3).
I don't understand. Why is CMake
Kevin Ottens wrote:
10% chance? 50%? 80%?
Basically what's the time frame for CMake 3.
I'll be 90% surprised if it is not released in January, or maybe February.
Thanks,
Steve.
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin Ottens wrote:
10% chance? 50%? 80%?
Basically what's the time frame for CMake 3.
I'll be 90% surprised if it is not released in January, or maybe February.
Thanks,
Steve.
On Monday 18 November 2013 12:49:39 Stephen Kelly wrote:
Stephen Kelly wrote:
It'd need to be released quite a bit before us to
be something we can consider as a dependency. At that point I'm
considering having 2.8.12 as dependency for the release (so that it got
time to spread, sounds
Kevin Ottens wrote:
You have enough credibility that people would believe it and spread it,
but it is not true. That's not how backward compatibility works in CMake.
I know, I was more thinking about the natural spreading of new version in
distros. The time they package stuff and that ends
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112913/
---
(Updated Nov. 18, 2013, 2:19 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112896/
---
(Updated Nov. 18, 2013, 1:21 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112896/#review43888
---
This review has been submitted with commit
ahoy,
I just noticed that frameworks applications explode when started
without a sycoca:
Trying to open ksycoca from /home/me/.project-neon5-kde//cache/ksycoca5
Trying to open global ksycoca from
/home/me/.project-neon5-kde//local/share/kde5/services/ksycoca5
Still no database...
ASSERT: str in
On Nov. 15, 2013, 12:32 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Why do you need to drop the version? In similar cases we've been bumping to
5...
Kevin Ottens wrote:
Yeah I'm surprised as well... OTOH that's a regular library, we don't
mention the version name for those (unlike for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113887/
---
(Updated Nov. 18, 2013, 2:22 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113887/#review43891
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113863/
---
(Updated Nov. 18, 2013, 2:34 p.m.)
Review request for Build System and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113863/#review43892
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Stephen Kelly
On Nov. 18, 2013, 2:34
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
On Monday 18 November 2013 13:27:19 Aleix Pol wrote:
So would it be that bad to have a macro of ours that ends up being just a
wrapper to qt5_wrap_ui?
Otherwise, this delays the possibility to help the ongoing porting
It seems subject broke over the weekend. kactivities fails to compile:
c++: error: KF5::KDBusAddons-NOTFOUND: No such file or directory
kactivities uses:
find_package (KF5 CONFIG REQUIRED KDBusAddons)
so it's pretty bare-bones.
Could someone have a look or suggest a fix?
Thanks,
--
sebas
On Monday 18 November 2013 17:41:49 Aleix Pol wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
Right, we need to cater to that need too. Since that's tied to ki18n use,
what about putting that wrapper macro in ki18n for the time being?
Of course it should be
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Aleix Pol aleix...@kde.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
It seems subject broke over the weekend. kactivities fails to compile:
c++: error: KF5::KDBusAddons-NOTFOUND: No such file or directory
kactivities
Chusslove Illich wrote:
[: Stephen Kelly :]
This depends on Qt 5.3 and CMake master plus some trivial new generator
expressions. Aside from bikeshedding names of things and defaults, can
you see any problem with this?
Other than bikeshedding about the defaults (which I will do a bit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113887/#review43910
---
${KAUTH_POLICY_FILES_INSTALL_DIR}
This is bogus (but e.g.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Chusslove Illich caslav.i...@gmx.netwrote:
[: Kevin Ottens :]
Of course it should be removed when we get a proper fix via CMake 3
around. But in the meantime it'll do the trick and allow removing
dependencies on KDE4Support just for that.
[: Aleix Pol
35 matches
Mail list logo
