---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118484/#review59032
---
Ship it!
If that is the way to do it in KF5, I am OK ;)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118489/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kconfig
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118490/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kdnssd
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118486/#review59035
---
For KF5 I don't have anything other than tests at the moment.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118489/#review59060
---
Changing the macro name is a no-brainer. Comments below; a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118490/#review59066
---
Ship it!
The actual changes are sensible, hence the shipit,
On June 3, 2014, 7:11 a.m., Chusslove Illich wrote:
For KF5 I don't have anything other than tests at the moment. I should soon
adapt some of the test programs I used earlier...
Could you also check how this patch relates to the commit 06fdfea5?
It does the opposite to that commit.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118484/#review59068
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118484/
---
(Updated June 3, 2014, 10:19 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
Hi,
I noticed that in ECM, the generated file in
/usr/share/ECM/cmake/ECMConfigVersion.cmake contains an architecture check:
# check that the installed version has the same 32/64bit-ness as the one which
is currently searching:
if(NOT ${CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P} STREQUAL 4)
math(EXPR
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118270/
---
(Updated June 3, 2014, 3:50 p.m.)
Review request for Documentation, KDE
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118498/
---
Review request for Build System, Extra Cmake Modules and KDE Frameworks.
On 03/06/14 13:08, Daniel Vrátil wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that in ECM, the generated file in
/usr/share/ECM/cmake/ECMConfigVersion.cmake contains an architecture check:
# check that the installed version has the same 32/64bit-ness as the one
which
is currently searching:
if(NOT
On Sunday 01 June 2014 10:34:07 David Faure wrote:
On Friday 30 May 2014 07:54:45 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Hi all,
while trying to get rid of kdelibs4support I stumbled [1] over
KIntSpinBox::setSuffix which allows to set a plural aware suffix. The
recommendation is to port to QSpinBox,
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 17:53:22 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Sunday 01 June 2014 10:34:07 David Faure wrote:
On Friday 30 May 2014 07:54:45 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Hi all,
while trying to get rid of kdelibs4support I stumbled [1] over
KIntSpinBox::setSuffix which allows to set a plural
Hello,
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 17:59:18 David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 17:53:22 Kevin Ottens wrote:
I'm not sure I get the reasoning leading to that conclusion. Can't be done
upstream in Qt?
This is all about calling i18n() at runtime, from within the widget (when
the value
Hello,
On Thursday 22 May 2014 21:08:05 Alex Merry wrote:
There are currently four frameworks that are yellow (for between 6 hours and
8 days). kdelibs4support has had 3 commits (not counting those by scripty)
since it broke that have done nothing to fix the issue.
If we claim that our
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118499/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark.
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 18:10:50 Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello,
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 17:59:18 David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 17:53:22 Kevin Ottens wrote:
I'm not sure I get the reasoning leading to that conclusion. Can't be
done
upstream in Qt?
This is all about
Hi,
I am building libkdegames on KF5/Qt5 using CMake 3 but I'm not getting
deprecation warnings for KDELibs4Support classes (KDialog, KFileDialog
etc.). However, I get all the deprecation warnings when I use CMake 2.8.
Also, functions like KGlobal::dirs() do give a warning on CMake 3. Is it
some
Le mardi 3 juin 2014 19:25:54 David Faure a écrit :
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 18:10:50 Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello,
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 17:59:18 David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 17:53:22 Kevin Ottens wrote:
I'm not sure I get the reasoning leading to that conclusion. Can't
On 03/06/14 17:24, Kevin Ottens wrote:
I see room for improvement in what gets evaluated when (like ability to run a
patch in jenkins as part of the review process), I'm just stuck on the term
enforcing there, not sure what you have in mind.
Neither am I, to be honest. It just feels like
On June 3, 2014, 6:16 a.m., Alex Merry wrote:
src/mdnsd-servicetypebrowser.cpp, line 51
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118490/diff/1/?file=277690#file277690line51
Interesting... any idea which monday?
I'm assuming that is any Monday, as that used to be the day to break SIC/BIC
On June 3, 2014, 6:12 a.m., Alex Merry wrote:
Changing the macro name is a no-brainer. Comments below; a lot of them are
about binary compatibility issues, and these depend on how we expect this
macro to be used. I believe that Qt5 makes all its deprecated functions
header-only so
I was wondering why I couldn't find plasma-framework in tier 3 on api.kde.org
not below frameworks [1] although it is actually shown as part of tier 3 in the
dependency graph in [2] ...
What am I missing?
[1] http://api.kde.org/frameworks-api/frameworks5-apidocs/
[2]
Hi folks,
there is eventually unexpected SUCCESS ...
(... although I didn’t manage to patch Qt's sources to handle a non-standard
path ...)
... since as a work-around I have simply copied the file tree installed by
kdoctools into the KDE/CI system’s “/Library/Application Support/” folder:
26 matches
Mail list logo
