---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118775/#review60639
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118775/
---
(Updated June 21, 2014, 7:39 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Friday 20 June 2014 13:13:20 Aleix Pol wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
On Friday 20 June 2014 01:46:10 Aleix Pol wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I was thinking, since the policy
On Friday 20 June 2014 22:11:57 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Divendres, 20 de juny de 2014, a les 01:46:10, Aleix Pol va escriure:
I've heard of many complaints about how noisy is kde-frameworks mailing
list because of review requests. Also, I fear there's people not working
at full speed in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118853/#review60646
---
What is the status of categorized debugging/logging support
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118739/
---
(Updated June 21, 2014, 9:37 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
On June 21, 2014, 11:36 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
What is the status of categorized debugging/logging support in Qt, and how
do we utilize that in our frameworks?
If we are still simply using uncategorized qDebug(), please commit it.
We can use qCDebug; the only problem is that
On Thu, June 19, 2014 23:21:22 Marco Martin wrote:
Hi all,
I was thinking, since the policy for committing in frameworks is to always
asking for a review, what about on repositories under frameworks/* adding an
hook that accepts pushes only if the comment has a REVIEW: line?
I have been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118768/#review60667
---
This review has been submitted with commit
Git commit f6f1e8c7b8321389fe8268fc25254bd512a6f399 by Alex Merry.
Committed on 15/06/2014 at 16:21.
Pushed by alexmerry into branch 'master'.
ECMAddTests: make NAME_PREFIX only apply to the test, not the target
David Faure and Patrick Spendrin have convinced me that NAME_PREFIX
should be
See http://build.kde.org/job/ktexteditor_master_qt5/427/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118768/
---
(Updated June 21, 2014, 3:42 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Saturday 21 June 2014 11:22:28 Michael Pyne wrote:
On Thu, June 19, 2014 23:21:22 Marco Martin wrote:
Hi all,
I was thinking, since the policy for committing in frameworks is to always
asking for a review, what about on repositories under frameworks/* adding
an hook that accepts pushes
On Sat, June 21, 2014 19:34:21 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Saturday 21 June 2014 11:22:28 Michael Pyne wrote:
On Thu, June 19, 2014 23:21:22 Marco Martin wrote:
Hi all,
I was thinking, since the policy for committing in frameworks is to
always
asking for a review, what about on
14 matches
Mail list logo
