On Thursday 03 July 2014 19:50:35 laurent Montel wrote:
Hi,
During kdepim porting I saw that it was not possible to add a ActionButton
as QButtonBox is protected.
= we can do it if we create a derived class.
But it’s not a very easy method for just add a button.
I would like to add a new
On 03/07/14 22:06, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
kdelibs4support ships an old copy of FindGettext.cmake. This is incompatible
with the version shipping in cmake and causes some compile failures. Can I
remove it?
The interfaces of both files look like they should be the same. Do you
have any info
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 10:01:46AM +0100, Alex Merry wrote:
On 03/07/14 22:06, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
kdelibs4support ships an old copy of FindGettext.cmake. This is
incompatible with the version shipping in cmake and causes some compile
failures. Can I remove it?
The interfaces of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119110/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure.
Repository: kio
On 04/07/14 10:07, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 10:01:46AM +0100, Alex Merry wrote:
On 03/07/14 22:06, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
kdelibs4support ships an old copy of FindGettext.cmake. This is
incompatible with the version shipping in cmake and causes some compile
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/
---
Review request for Build System, KDE Frameworks and Jonathan Riddell.
On 04/07/14 10:41, Alex Merry wrote:
On 04/07/14 10:07, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 10:01:46AM +0100, Alex Merry wrote:
On 03/07/14 22:06, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
kdelibs4support ships an old copy of FindGettext.cmake. This is
incompatible with the version shipping in
See http://build.kde.org/job/ktexteditor_master_qt5/449/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119110/#review61597
---
I confirm this patch fixes the death lock.
- Aleix Pol
On Friday 04 July 2014 09:17:04 laurent Montel wrote:
Le vendredi 4 juillet 2014 08:13:58 Kevin Ottens a écrit :
On Thursday 03 July 2014 19:50:35 laurent Montel wrote:
Hi,
During kdepim porting I saw that it was not possible to add a
ActionButton
as QButtonBox is protected.
= we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/#review61601
---
cmake/modules/FindGettext.cmake
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/
---
(Updated July 4, 2014, 1:05 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
On Thursday 03 July 2014 19:50:35 laurent Montel wrote:
Hi,
During kdepim porting I saw that it was not possible to add a
ActionButton as QButtonBox is protected.
= we can do it if we create a derived class.
But it’s not a very easy method for just add a button.
I would like to add a new
Le vendredi 4 juillet 2014 16:46:24 Christoph Feck a écrit :
On Thursday 03 July 2014 19:50:35 laurent Montel wrote:
Hi,
During kdepim porting I saw that it was not possible to add a
ActionButton as QButtonBox is protected.
= we can do it if we create a derived class.
But it’s not a
HI all,
I recently noticed that the two GHNS windows in Plasma 5 very recently freeze
the whole process as soon the dialog opens
I tried to bisect things and the problem is definitely in the commit
8cb050ea61dfb195fee0293c7c0eb87cb0a90654
in the KIO framework
KIO thread-safety: protect
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119110/#review61611
---
I can confirm it fixes it here as well
- Marco Martin
On
On 04/07/14 17:40, Marco Martin wrote:
HI all,
I recently noticed that the two GHNS windows in Plasma 5 very recently freeze
the whole process as soon the dialog opens
I tried to bisect things and the problem is definitely in the commit
8cb050ea61dfb195fee0293c7c0eb87cb0a90654
in the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119110/#review61614
---
recursive mutexes are more expensive. Can you try this patch
On July 4, 2014, 7:22 p.m., David Faure wrote:
recursive mutexes are more expensive. Can you try this patch instead?
http://www.davidfaure.fr/2014/kprotocolmanager.cpp.diff
Actually, nothing beats a unittest :) Added, fix pushed.
On Thursday 03 July 2014 23:30:14 Marko Käning wrote:
So, please, apply this patch to solid's git repo and re-package the
KF 5.0.0 release accordingly.
Done (v5.0.0-rc2 tag)
--
David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on KDE Frameworks 5
On July 4, 2014, 7:22 p.m., David Faure wrote:
recursive mutexes are more expensive. Can you try this patch instead?
http://www.davidfaure.fr/2014/kprotocolmanager.cpp.diff
David Faure wrote:
Actually, nothing beats a unittest :) Added, fix pushed.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119110/
---
(Updated July 4, 2014, 9:58 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On July 4, 2014, 7:22 p.m., David Faure wrote:
recursive mutexes are more expensive. Can you try this patch instead?
http://www.davidfaure.fr/2014/kprotocolmanager.cpp.diff
David Faure wrote:
Actually, nothing beats a unittest :) Added, fix pushed.
On July 4, 2014, 7:22 p.m., David Faure wrote:
recursive mutexes are more expensive. Can you try this patch instead?
http://www.davidfaure.fr/2014/kprotocolmanager.cpp.diff
David Faure wrote:
Actually, nothing beats a unittest :) Added, fix pushed.
On July 4, 2014, 7:22 p.m., David Faure wrote:
recursive mutexes are more expensive. Can you try this patch instead?
http://www.davidfaure.fr/2014/kprotocolmanager.cpp.diff
David Faure wrote:
Actually, nothing beats a unittest :) Added, fix pushed.
25 matches
Mail list logo
