---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123707/
---
(Updated May 11, 2015, 4:20 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
On Mon, May 11, 2015, at 12:05 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Diumenge, 10 de maig de 2015, a les 23:47:32, Christian Mollekopf va
escriure:
On Sun, May 10, 2015, at 11:23 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Diumenge, 10 de maig de 2015, a les 22:31:10, Alexander Neundorf va
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 12:44 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2015 10:45:13 Mark Gaiser wrote:
(wow, time flies)
The issue i see here is different processes. KIO::listDir is a process,
KDirListerCache lives in the client process.
I guess you didn't mean this
On Sun, May 10, 2015, at 11:13 PM, David Faure wrote:
On Sunday 10 May 2015 22:31:10 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
There I have Qt available, as Christian says, it feels like a system
library, our application is built on it.
Well, I wish you would see KF5 as a natural extension of Qt,
El Diumenge, 10 de maig de 2015, a les 22:33:30, Christian Mollekopf va
escriure:
On Sun, May 10, 2015, at 03:39 PM, David Faure wrote:
On Sunday 10 May 2015 12:36:53 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
* I'd consider Qt to be a lower level library. Qt mostly provides
fundamentals just like libc
El Diumenge, 10 de maig de 2015, a les 23:47:32, Christian Mollekopf va
escriure:
On Sun, May 10, 2015, at 11:23 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Diumenge, 10 de maig de 2015, a les 22:31:10, Alexander Neundorf va
escriure:
On Sunday, May 10, 2015 15:39:02 David Faure wrote:
On
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123700/#review80188
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On May 9, 2015,
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Saturday, May 09, 2015 13:06:57 David Faure wrote:
On Saturday 09 May 2015 12:52:52 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Why do we need a blog if we have an announcement?
https://www.kde.org/announcements/kde-frameworks-5.10.0.php
On mei 10, 2015, 10:43 p.m., David Faure wrote:
src/core/kfileitem.cpp, line 1115
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123654/diff/1/?file=366630#file366630line1115
I had the same thought as Milian... but I wonder why I wrote that
comment. m_strText is the displayName, m_strName is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123714/
---
(Updated May 10, 2015, 10:01 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123713/
---
(Updated May 10, 2015, 10:01 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:48 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Saturday 09 May 2015 13:00:54 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Saturday, May 09, 2015 13:06:57 David Faure wrote:
On Saturday 09 May 2015 12:52:52 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Why do we need a blog if we have an announcement?
On Sunday, May 10, 2015 15:39:02 David Faure wrote:
On Sunday 10 May 2015 12:36:53 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
* I'd consider Qt to be a lower level library. Qt mostly provides
fundamentals just like libc or the STL,
and it's therefore okay for me to just work with what I have available.
On Sunday 10 May 2015 22:31:10 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
There I have Qt available, as Christian says, it feels like a system
library, our application is built on it.
Well, I wish you would see KF5 as a natural extension of Qt, therefore a
system library too, if you want to call it that.
Now
On Monday 11 May 2015 00:13:27 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
Are you volunteering, or just making demands for others to do work for
you?
I'm volunteering to do the maintenance and release engineering for the
libraries that matter to me,
and I'm also prepared to work out a proposal on how to
On May 6, 2015, 5:40 p.m., René J.V. Bertin wrote:
I'm not sure, after reading http://pig.made-it.com/uidgid.html
also:
```
id nobody
uid=4294967294(nobody) gid=4294967294(nobody)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123719/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Luc Menut.
Repository: kservice
On Sun, May 10, 2015, at 03:39 PM, David Faure wrote:
On Sunday 10 May 2015 12:36:53 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
* I'd consider Qt to be a lower level library. Qt mostly provides
fundamentals just like libc or the STL,
and it's therefore okay for me to just work with what I have available.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123654/#review80187
---
autotests/kdirsortfilterproxymodel_benchmark.cpp (line 2)
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org wrote:
Somehow kbuildsycoca5 is crashing here lately. I nuked my whole kde
prefix (/usr/local) and rebuilt with packaged qt from my distro
(arch). But kbuildsycoca5 is crashing every time I run it with some
issue in QByteArray.
Hey all,
Somehow kbuildsycoca5 is crashing here lately. I nuked my whole kde
prefix (/usr/local) and rebuilt with packaged qt from my distro
(arch). But kbuildsycoca5 is crashing every time I run it with some
issue in QByteArray. Has anyone seen this lately/before or know how I
can get past it?
It sure isn't. I've also tried nuking ~/.cache/ksycoca5* and such.
Same result. ~/.cache is owned by me and has decent permissions also.
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Bhushan Shah bhus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org wrote:
Somehow
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123713/#review80162
---
Ship it!
- David Faure
On May 10, 2015, 9:37 a.m., David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123714/#review80163
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Faure
On May 10, 2015, 9:56
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123706/#review80164
---
src/kmainwindow.cpp (line 122)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123713/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kio
Description
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123705/
---
(Updated May 10, 2015, 10:30 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123707/
---
(Updated May 10, 2015, 10:47 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
On Sat, May 9, 2015, at 01:27 PM, David Faure wrote:
On Saturday 09 May 2015 13:08:35 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
we pretend it's all independent libraries but still they all depend on the
latest version of all other libs.
It's a question of the definition of independent.
E.g.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123706/
---
(Updated May 10, 2015, 10:15 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123714/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: frameworkintegration
On Thursday 07 May 2015 22:57:47 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
Hi,
As with some other bits of knowledge during porting today I just share this
one:
https://community.kde.org/index.php?title=Calligra/Building/3diff=42353old
id=42349
When you use Qt4/KF5, debugfull is dead [1] so you'd be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123705/#review80176
---
Ship it!
So now we have a setter that returns a value ;)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123706/#review80177
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Faure
On May 10, 2015, 4:05
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123706/
---
(Updated May 10, 2015, 5:12 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123707/
---
(Updated May 10, 2015, 5:11 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123705/
---
(Updated May 10, 2015, 5:10 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123705/#review80165
---
src/gui/kconfiggui.cpp (line 45)
Also, while this is happening I did a package upgrade to see if it's a
Qt packaging problem. I got another update of Qt packages from the
arch repo (5.4.1-6 now) But I still get the same issues (kbuildsycoca5
crash and login dbus issue). I'll start a fresh rebuild and look later
today I guess.
On May 6, 2015, 4:40 p.m., René J.V. Bertin wrote:
I'm not sure, after reading http://pig.made-it.com/uidgid.html
also:
```
id nobody
uid=4294967294(nobody) gid=4294967294(nobody)
On Sunday 10 May 2015 07:49:48 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
==2883== Address 0x is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
This must be a miscompilation, I see no other reason for the refcount of a
QByteArray to be at address 0x.
Try rebuilding kservice from scratch.
--
David
On Sunday 10 May 2015 08:24:48 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
Rebuilt kservice (and nuked my build folder and /usr/local just to be
doubly sure.) kbuildsycoca5 still crashes with this same backtrace, no
idea why. Could it be a bug in QtCore? Arch testing packages of Qt?
I doubt it. More likely a
On May 9, 2015, 7:42 p.m., David Faure wrote:
With this API change, I wonder if it makes sense for kconfiggui.cpp to
retain ownership of the KConfig object. Wouldn't it be safer if the caller
got ownership of it, saved into it, and then discarded the KConfig
instance? Then we
I see. Some kde applications segfault (klettres, okular) other's run
ok (dolphin, khangman) I haven't tried others. As for qt binaries I
checked the binaries that come with the arch package, and assistant,
designer, qdbusviewer all work fine. Is there one in particular I
should check?
On Sun, May
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123707/
---
(Updated May 10, 2015, 4:03 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123706/
---
(Updated May 10, 2015, 2:39 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
Also, none of the recent patches on
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/log/trunk?h=packages/qt5
make me nervous, all seem to be pretty straightforward. Could it be
lower level as in my glibc is too new, or the compiler itself (GCC
5.1.0)
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Jeremy
On May 9, 2015, 7:42 p.m., David Faure wrote:
With this API change, I wonder if it makes sense for kconfiggui.cpp to
retain ownership of the KConfig object. Wouldn't it be safer if the caller
got ownership of it, saved into it, and then discarded the KConfig
instance? Then we
On May 9, 2015, 7:42 p.m., David Faure wrote:
With this API change, I wonder if it makes sense for kconfiggui.cpp to
retain ownership of the KConfig object. Wouldn't it be safer if the caller
got ownership of it, saved into it, and then discarded the KConfig
instance? Then we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123706/
---
(Updated May 10, 2015, 4:05 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
On Sunday 10 May 2015 06:13:15 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
#7 0x004363d0 in QLinkedListKSycocaResource::detach
(this=0x69b140) at /usr/include/qt/QtCore/qlinkedlist.h:99
Is that Qt4 or Qt5?
Use ldd on your kbuildsycoca5 binary to check which Qt libs it's using.
(and the next step if all
On Sunday 10 May 2015 12:36:53 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
* I'd consider Qt to be a lower level library. Qt mostly provides
fundamentals just like libc or the STL,
and it's therefore okay for me to just work with what I have available.
I hope you can understand that the decision on how Qt (on
Yep, it's Qt5. After rebuilding everything trying to log into a plasma
session I get startkde: could not sync environment to dbus in
.xsession-errors, not much before that besides a bad dbus call. Seems
very similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191171
I've never thought
Rebuilt kservice (and nuked my build folder and /usr/local just to be
doubly sure.) kbuildsycoca5 still crashes with this same backtrace, no
idea why. Could it be a bug in QtCore? Arch testing packages of Qt?
0x is -1, no? did it get decreased one too many times somehow?
On Sun, May 10,
On May 9, 2015, 7:42 p.m., David Faure wrote:
With this API change, I wonder if it makes sense for kconfiggui.cpp to
retain ownership of the KConfig object. Wouldn't it be safer if the caller
got ownership of it, saved into it, and then discarded the KConfig
instance? Then we
On May 9, 2015, 7:52 p.m., David Faure wrote:
src/core/kconfig.h, line 368
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123707/diff/1/?file=367996#file367996line368
I don't think this API is good to have (which is why it was never
added). Most kconfig instances are a view over multiple
El Diumenge, 10 de maig de 2015, a les 08:57:28, Jeremy Whiting va escriure:
Also, none of the recent patches on
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/log/trunk?h=packages/qt
5 make me nervous, all seem to be pretty straightforward. Could it be lower
level as in my glibc is too
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123705/
---
(Updated May 10, 2015, 4:01 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
I only built kf5/kde applications. Though I've no idea what compiler
was used to build the Qt packages. probably g++ 4.9 from arch stable I
bet. /me removes testing, downgrades the dozen packages from it and
will rebuild. Thanks for the tips both of you. Hopefully I can finish
the 15.04.1 release
\o/ KService built with a downgraded (4.9.1) g++ works fine. Sorry for
the noise. Should be able to detect this sort of problem quickly in
the future though. I'll stick with non testing arch for the time
being.
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org wrote:
I only
On Sunday, 10 May 2015 15:39:02 CEST, David Faure wrote:
Qt *is* splitted. It's just that the splitted libs are released together.
The splitting of Qt is not full and complete, however. Modules tend to
use each other's internal APIs, and that's the biggest reason for not
supporting random
On May 6, 2015, 6:40 p.m., René J.V. Bertin wrote:
I'm not sure, after reading http://pig.made-it.com/uidgid.html
also:
```
id nobody
uid=4294967294(nobody) gid=4294967294(nobody)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123707/#review80186
---
If filePath() is relative, it can't be used in a discard
63 matches
Mail list logo
