kfunk added a comment.
FYI: I'll wait with pushing until v5.33 is released.
REPOSITORY
R240 Extra CMake Modules
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5302
To: kfunk, kossebau, dfaure, apol
Cc: apol, #frameworks, #build_system
kfunk added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5302#99816, @apol wrote:
> +1
>
> Which warnings? Are they proper warnings that should be fixed?
See comment inside the source code: It's triggered by normal usage from
`qCDebug()`...
REPOSITORY
R240 Extra CMake Modules
kfunk updated this revision to Diff 13096.
kfunk added a comment.
Re-enable for Clang
REPOSITORY
R240 Extra CMake Modules
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5302?vs=13094&id=13096
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5302
AFFECTED FILES
k
kfunk added reviewers: kossebau, dfaure.
REPOSITORY
R240 Extra CMake Modules
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5302
To: kfunk, kossebau, dfaure
Cc: #frameworks, #build_system
kfunk created this revision.
Restricted Application added projects: Frameworks, Build System.
Restricted Application added subscribers: Build System, Frameworks.
REVISION SUMMARY
Add it to KDECompilerSettings.cmake instead of
KDEFrameworkCompilerSettings.cmake.
Users can then just enable
kfunk accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5299
To: davidedmundson, #frameworks, kfunk
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit R245:21118a62b546: Add include that is needed in msys2
(authored by kfunk).
REPOSITORY
R245 Solid
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4778?vs=11798&id=13083
REVISION DETAIL
https:
kfunk added a comment.
I've pushed your patch now. Usually the author is responsible for pushing, as
long as he has commit access to our infrastructure ;)
REPOSITORY
R245 Solid
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4778
To: russellg, #frameworks, kfunk
Cc: kfunk
can drop the call
> entirely and if not if we there is any downside to dropping it for
> windows.
>
> Cheers,
> HS
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
kfunk accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REPOSITORY
R275 KItemModels
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5231
To: apol, #frameworks, kfunk
kfunk accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REPOSITORY
R159 KActivities Statistics
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5233
To: apol, #frameworks, ivan, kfunk
kfunk added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> config-kioslave-file.h.cmake:13
>
> +/* Defined if st_birthime is defined */
> +#cmakedefine01 HAVE_ST_BIRTHTIME
Note: typo
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5138
To: tcberner, arrowdodger, ra
kfunk added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5136#96878, @aacid wrote:
> I'm not sure addign a dependency for releaseme in ki18n is a good idea to
be honest.
>
> This very "only works for KDE-based applications", a third-party using k18n
has no interest in this at all.
>
kfunk added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> KF5I18nConfig.cmake.in:12
> +
> +execute_process(COMMAND git config --get remote.origin.url
> +OUTPUT_VARIABLE reponame
Can you delay that git invocation to when the custom target is executed?
Otherwise we also pay for this whenever `KF5I18nCon
kfunk requested changes to this revision.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
REPOSITORY
R249 KI18n
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5136
To: apol, #frameworks, #build_system, aacid, sitter, kfunk
kfunk added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D3987#96418, @kossebau wrote:
> In https://phabricator.kde.org/D3987#95858, @kfunk wrote:
>
> > Closing. This Diff refactored the code technically correct.
>
>
> Technically correct, as in: it builds.
> But semantically it
kfunk added a comment.
Thanks for the quick fix!
REPOSITORY
R39 KTextEditor
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5108
To: cullmann, kfunk
Cc: kwrite-devel, #frameworks
kfunk accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REPOSITORY
R39 KTextEditor
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5108
To: cullmann, kfunk
Cc: kwrite-devel, #frameworks
kfunk added a comment.
Closing. This Diff refactored the code technically correct.
If you want to replace `MyFlags flags = nullptr` by `... = {}` please do so
in a follow-up patch/review.
REPOSITORY
R280 Prison
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3987
To: kfunk, #framework
kfunk closed this revision.
kfunk added a comment.
Closing. Please just strip the flag from CMake flags if you're using a
library making use of alternative tokens.
We've just seen compilation failing early because some lib in KF5
accidentally used alternative tokens => would have broken
kfunk accepted this revision.
kfunk added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5089
To: rjvbb, #build_system, #frameworks, kfunk
Cc: kfunk, apol, kde-mac, #frameworks, #build_system
kfunk requested changes to this revision.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
REPOSITORY
R240 Extra CMake Modules
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5089
To: rjvbb, #build_system, #frameworks, kfunk
Cc: kfunk, apol, kde-mac, #frameworks, #build_system
kfunk added a comment.
+1 to apol's recommendation. `... MATCHES "Clang"` is the expression everyone
uses.
Even in cmake.git:
Modules/CMakeDetermineCCompiler.cmake
138: if(CMAKE_C_COMPILER_ID MATCHES "GNU" OR CMAKE_C_COMPILER_ID MATCHES
"Clang")
Also see:
http://stackov
g/D4910
Cheers,
Kevin
> TEST PLAN
> Given it only alters the allocation behavior, no changes visible, beside
> less heap allocs.
>
> REPOSITORY
> R237 KConfig
>
> REVISION DETAIL
> https://phabricator.kde.org/D4941
>
> AFFECTED FILES
> src/core/kconfigini.cpp
g a "vertical" line in which all the
> > > subjects of the differential emails start makes it much easier to read.>
> > +1 I'd even shorten The 'Differential' part of it to just 'Diff'.
>
> Agreed to both.
+1
> Regards,
> - Michael Pyn
kfunk accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REPOSITORY
R245 Solid
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4778
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: russellg, #frameworks, kfunk
Cc: kfunk
kfunk accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REPOSITORY
R238 KDocTools
BRANCH
categorized-logging
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4733
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: ltoscano, kfunk
Cc: #
kfunk abandoned this revision.
kfunk added a comment.
Okay, please do.
REPOSITORY
R238 KDocTools
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4727
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks, ltoscano
Cc: #frameworks, #document
kfunk added a reviewer: ltoscano.
REPOSITORY
R238 KDocTools
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4727
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks, ltoscano
Cc: #frameworks, #documentation
kfunk added a reviewer: Frameworks.
REPOSITORY
R238 KDocTools
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4727
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks
Cc: #frameworks, #documentation
kfunk created this revision.
Restricted Application added projects: Frameworks, Documentation.
Restricted Application added subscribers: Documentation, Frameworks.
REPOSITORY
R238 KDocTools
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4727
AFFECTED FILES
src/xslt.cpp
EMAI
kfunk added a comment.
Thanks for the investigation, Francis! \o/
REPOSITORY
R265 KConfigWidgets
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4637
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: flherne, #frameworks, graesslin
Cc: kfunk, graesslin
kfunk added a comment.
I start to agree that it's probably better to revert this patch, for the
simple reason: We might break compilation of a project using boost if boost
decides to add code which uses alternative tokens to any of its headers. This
is not under our control.
On the othe
kfunk accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REPOSITORY
R240 Extra CMake Modules
BRANCH
inotify
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3826
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: adridg, apol, arrowdodg
On Friday, 20 January 2017 09:19:21 CET Kevin Funk wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18 January 2017 21:12:07 CET Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > As a result of the recent porting from 0 to nullptr, we have things like
> >
> > Qt::WindowFlags f = nullptr
Please
s obvious that the headers should be fixed to solve the issue) can not
> handle this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve.
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
kfunk added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D3987#78420, @kossebau wrote:
> In https://phabricator.kde.org/D3987#78383, @dfaure wrote:
>
> > I agree. But it's the default value anyway, so why not remove it
completely, thus making everyone happy?
>
>
> What do you mean
kfunk added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D3987#78421, @kossebau wrote:
> Another possible issue with using `nullptr`as value for flags: it might
break calling methods with overloads when once a pointer type and once a flags
type is used. Not seen, but there is a risk.
>
kfunk added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D3987#78257, @kossebau wrote:
> Seems the porting script had a few wrong matches, where 0 values for enums
were misinterpreted as pointer:
>
> E.g.
>
> @@ -1015 +1015 @@ void KWindowSystemPrivateX11::setShowingDesktop(bool
s
kfunk accepted this revision.
kfunk added a reviewer: kfunk.
kfunk added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Note: That's due to my patch in https://phabricator.kde.org/D3850
REPOSITORY
R378 KExiv2 Library
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.or
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit R241:9888ddd2e1b9: Fix some -Wdocumentation warnings (authored
by kfunk).
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4154?vs=10270&id=10284
REVISION DETAIL
https://ph
kfunk marked an inline comment as done.
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4154
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks
Cc: aacid, #frameworks
kfunk updated this revision to Diff 10270.
kfunk added a comment.
Address comments by aacid & fix a few more warnings
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4154?vs=10208&id=10270
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4154
AF
kfunk abandoned this revision.
kfunk added a comment.
Patched Qt instead:
https://phabricator.kde.org/R138:7f78f7297add7c510c1cf0f1707197c8c403fcee
I can't make my mind up how to fix this cleanly, to be honest.
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D2545
EMAIL PREFERENCES
kfunk abandoned this revision.
kfunk added a comment.
Patched Qt instead:
https://phabricator.kde.org/R138:7f78f7297add7c510c1cf0f1707197c8c403fcee
I can't make my mind up how to fix this cleanly, to be honest.
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D2546
EMAIL PREFERENCES
kfunk closed this revision.
kfunk added a comment.
This has been pushed:
commit f86e587aefd94b5ea2c6f7ecca29c266f36256fa
Author: Kevin Funk
Date: Wed Nov 16 22:32:32 2016 +0100
winutils_p.h: Restore compatibility with WinXP SDK
REVISION DETAIL
https
kfunk added a comment.
This has been pushed:
commit 61f3c9fef7a5ca1a952e7681f5d37b7a9f0689c4
Author: Kevin Funk
Date: Wed Nov 16 23:02:33 2016 +0100
Make compile against WinXP SDK
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3393
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https
kfunk abandoned this revision.
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3393
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, arichardson, #frameworks
Cc: dhaumann
kfunk added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D3987#77726, @dfaure wrote:
> In https://phabricator.kde.org/D3987#77725, @kfunk wrote:
>
> > Want me to do a `s/Q_NULLPTR/nullptr/`, too?
>
>
> This would make things consistent and avoid confusing future contributors
about
kfunk added a comment.
Hmm, one thing I forgot to ask:
Want me to do a `s/Q_NULLPTR/nullptr/`, too?
REPOSITORY
R280 Prison
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3987
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks, dfau
kfunk added a comment.
@dfaure `find_path` is okay here, it's commonly used for finding includes.
See: https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/command/find_path.html
`check_include_files` is used for just checking the existence of a include,
not finding out //where// it is.
Example use: `CHE
kfunk requested changes to this revision.
kfunk added a reviewer: kfunk.
kfunk added inline comments.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
INLINE COMMENTS
> FindInotify.cmake:51
> +if(Inotify_INCLUDE_DIRS)
> + # On Linux there is no library to link against, on the BSDs there is.
> + #
kfunk added a reviewer: Frameworks.
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4154
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks
Cc: #frameworks
kfunk created this revision.
Restricted Application added a project: Frameworks.
Restricted Application added a subscriber: Frameworks.
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4154
AFFECTED FILES
src/core/global.h
src/core/job_base.h
src/core/j
have applied
`Q_DECL_OVERRIDE` everywhere. Do you want to double-check?
- Kevin Funk
On Dec. 29, 2016, 11:48 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.re
y.kde.org/Frameworks/Policies
Regards,
Kevin
[1] https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/2016-December/
040653.html
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit R280:42ae697a1afe: Use nullptr everywhere (authored by kfunk).
CHANGED PRIOR TO COMMIT
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3987?vs=9785&id=10206#toc
REPOSITORY
R280 Prison
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://
kfunk updated the summary for this revision.
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3987
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks, dfaure
Cc: dfaure, graesslin
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit R240:a5f3a76e1479: Pass -fno-operator-names when supported
(authored by kfunk).
REPOSITORY
R240 Extra CMake Modules
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3850?vs=9443&id=10205
REVISIO
kfunk accepted this revision.
kfunk added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D2075#76591, @jonathans wrote:
> They interrupt the logical flow of the code, and because the conditionally
executed code no longer sits inside an indented
kfunk added a comment.
Why did you remove all the early-returns? Was that the case before in one of
your earlier patches?
REPOSITORY
R239 KDELibs4Support
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D2075
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
T
to the original post. Also please include replies you've already
seen, next time...
Thanks,
Kevin
[1] http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/2017-January/025694.html
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
py to receive any patches that improve shortcut handling in KDevelop on
Mac.
Cheers,
Kevin
>
> R.
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
kfunk added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> graesslin wrote in job.h:50
> Question: is this change API and ABI stable?
Definitely ABI stable, since default arguments are not part of the function
signature.
I'm not aware this could break API compat either (well, only in case the
compiler co
kfunk updated the summary for this revision.
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3987
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks
On Friday, 30 December 2016 15:29:52 CET Kevin Funk wrote:
> On Friday, 30 December 2016 15:25:56 CET David Faure wrote:
> > On vendredi 30 décembre 2016 12:56:09 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > El divendres, 30 de desembre de 2016, a les 12:24:38 CET, Luig
kfunk updated the summary for this revision.
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3987
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks
kfunk created this revision.
kfunk added a reviewer: Frameworks.
kfunk set the repository for this revision to R241 KIO.
Restricted Application added a project: Frameworks.
REVISION SUMMARY
The full patch (all Frameworks ported to using nullptr instead of null
literals) changes around 9000 line
those warnings and fix
them -- only then we could enabled -Wdocumentation globally...
Would be nice to have though. I've just enabled it for all of kdevplatform/
kdevelop.
Cheers,
Kevin
[1] http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#comment-parsing-options
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org |
kfunk accepted this revision.
kfunk added a reviewer: kfunk.
kfunk added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Rest LGTM, but let's wait for another review
INLINE COMMENTS
> kdynamicjobtrackernowidgetstest.cpp:34
> +public:
> +virtual void start() { QTimer::singleSho
too many warnings
caused by this change.
We'll reapply it after the KF5 release. Most of the warnings have been fixed by
Laurent a few days ago (and I have a few more patches I'll push after the
release).
- Kevin Funk
On Dec. 29, 2016, 11:48 p.m., Albert Astals
kfunk added a comment.
Note: I'll push this after the imminent KF5 release if no-one objects.
REPOSITORY
R240 Extra CMake Modules
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3850
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfun
on.
>
> Sorry.
>
> We need to have a way to enable that warning flag which is accompanied
> by a way to resolve the huge amount warnings it generates. We can't just
> add that much noise to all the builds indefinitely.
>
> clang-tidy seems to have a modernize-use-ove
gt;>
> >> escriure:
> >> > Il 30 dicembre 2016 10:30:22 CET, Kevin Funk ha
scritto:
> >> > >Following-up on this thread, since I saw some more discussion about
> >> > >C++11
> >> > >
> >> > >usage in this RR:
>
On Friday, 30 December 2016 15:25:56 CET David Faure wrote:
> On vendredi 30 décembre 2016 12:56:09 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El divendres, 30 de desembre de 2016, a les 12:24:38 CET, Luigi Toscano va
> >
> > escriure:
> > > Il 30 dicembre 2016 10:30:
use nullptr unconditonally
ACK?
PS: I can do the work, I can script the refactoring with clang-tidy.
Let's move forward please.
Cheers,
Kevin
[1] https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/
Policies#Frameworks_compiler_requirements_and_C.2B.2B11
[2] http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/compiler_sup
kfunk added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D3850#72308, @rakuco wrote:
> Isn't it better to use `check_cxx_compiler_flag` to see if the flag is
supported and enable it in case it is?
-fno-operator-names is an ancient compiler flag, supported by GCC since at
least 2000
kfunk added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D3850#72077, @elvisangelaccio wrote:
> What about adding a way (cmake variable?) to opt-in if one wants to use the
alternative operators? Personally I like and use them whenever I start
something from scratch...
Hmm... You cou
kfunk added a reviewer: ivan.
REPOSITORY
R240 Extra CMake Modules
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3850
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks, ivan
kfunk added a comment.
Note: Just refreshing my complete KF5 build to test the change.
kactivities fails:
/home/kfunk/devel/src/kf5/kactivities/autotests/common/test.h:143:25:
error: token is not a valid binary operator in a preprocessor subexpression
#if defined(Q_NO_DEBUG) or
kfunk added a reviewer: Frameworks.
REPOSITORY
R240 Extra CMake Modules
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3850
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks
kfunk accepted this revision.
kfunk added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM
REPOSITORY
R240 Extra CMake Modules
BRANCH
ninja-colors
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3733
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpref
kfunk requested changes to this revision.
kfunk added a reviewer: kfunk.
kfunk added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
This flag is only needed for Ninja, correct? Thus please check for Ninja in
`CMAKE_GENERATOR ` before adding the compiler flag.
REPOSITORY
R240 Extr
kfunk added a reviewer: dfaure.
REPOSITORY
R275 KItemModels
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3548
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: lepagevalleeemmanuel, #frameworks, dfaure
Cc: kfunk, ltoscano
kfunk added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> krearrangecolumnsproxymodel.cpp:44
> +
> +const int cc = d_ptr->m_sourceColumns.size();
> +
Please no short hand variable names.
`cc` -> `sourceColCount`?
REPOSITORY
R275 KItemModels
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3548
EMAI
kfunk added a comment.
Windows: We have working gperf recipe in Craft => we're fine.
QtWebKit already had an (optional) dependency on gperf.
REPOSITORY
R240 Extra CMake Modules
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3830
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings
On Monday, 26 December 2016 01:19:41 CET Luigi Toscano wrote:
> ... so that it's easier to use Differential for reviews.
\o/
Thanks a lot for this!
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129678/#review101519
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Funk
On Dec. 20, 2016, 2:55
kfunk added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D2545#69298, @thiago wrote:
> In https://phabricator.kde.org/D2545#69187, @kfunk wrote:
>
> > In https://phabricator.kde.org/D2545#69091, @thiago wrote:
> >
> > > There doesn't seem to be a way of doing some clean up before the
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit R216:c3fc1271d6ad: Update QMake syntax highlighting file
(authored by kfunk).
CHANGED PRIOR TO COMMIT
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3691?vs=9048&id=9163#toc
REPOSITORY
R216 Syntax Highlighting
CHANGES
kfunk added a comment.
Bump
REPOSITORY
R216 Syntax Highlighting
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3691
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks
kfunk added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D2075#66751, @jonathans wrote:
> Agreed that would be more robust. In writing the patch I was seeking
consistency with those functions that already did the test, so those would also
need to be updated. Are there any situations where t
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit R237:e6c88f67e2cb: kconfig_compiler: Use nullptr in generated
code (authored by kfunk).
REPOSITORY
R237 KConfig
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3702?vs=9072&id=9075
REVISION DET
kfunk added a reviewer: Frameworks.
REPOSITORY
R237 KConfig
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3702
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks
kfunk added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D2545#69091, @thiago wrote:
> There doesn't seem to be a way of doing some clean up before the threads
are forcibly killed.
>
> Maybe if I abuse qtmain().
This would only fix it for non-console GUI applications if I underst
kfunk added a comment.
For the record, since I don't see an easy fix I'm pondering about patching
qtbase in craft.git:
Ideas:
a ) Add this to QDBusConnectionManager ctor:
qAddPostRoutine([]() {
QMetaObject::invokeMethod(QDBusConnectionManager::instance(), "quit");
kfunk added a comment.
> Here's the other problem: it's possible for threads to simply disappear on
Windows. Given that I see "dllmain" in the backtrace (though not DllMain), I
can't rule out that this has happened. Qt 5.6 has a workaround to another
deadlock caused by Windows. Can you try t
kfunk updated this revision to Diff 9048.
kfunk added a comment.
Add generator
REPOSITORY
R216 Syntax Highlighting
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3691?vs=9047&id=9048
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3691
AFFECTED FILES
data/gener
kfunk added a reviewer: Frameworks.
REPOSITORY
R216 Syntax Highlighting
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D3691
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kfunk, #frameworks
o this in 1-2 weeks (would fit our schedule). I don't think we want
to rush and release v5.0.4 right now though. That would be an almost identical
release to v5.0.3.
Cheers,
Kevin
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
201 - 300 of 530 matches
Mail list logo