Re: Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-11 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 10:22:13 AM CET Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Tuesday, 10 November 2015 08:34:02 CET, Martin Graesslin wrote: > > Yes, most tests don't require a WM. Especially the Net* tests > > simulate being a > > window manager. Only the KWindow* tests need a window manager. > > Inte

Re: Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-11 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Tuesday, 10 November 2015 08:34:02 CET, Martin Graesslin wrote: Yes, most tests don't require a WM. Especially the Net* tests simulate being a window manager. Only the KWindow* tests need a window manager. Interesting; it was a Heisenbug, apparently. I cannot reproduce it anymore, but I've

Re: Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-09 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Monday, November 9, 2015 6:00:43 PM CET Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Monday, 9 November 2015 08:21:21 CET, Martin Graesslin wrote: > > I'm sorry, but I'm not able to reproduce the failure on my > > local Qt 5.6 setup. > > The failures look like there is no WM running on the CI system, > > maybe openb

Re: Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-09 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Monday, 9 November 2015 08:21:21 CET, Martin Graesslin wrote: I'm sorry, but I'm not able to reproduce the failure on my local Qt 5.6 setup. The failures look like there is no WM running on the CI system, maybe openbox crashed? (We had that before that our tests were able to trigger crashes

Re: Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-08 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Saturday, November 7, 2015 11:59:48 AM CET David Faure wrote: > > - [5.6] kwindowsystem: KWindowInfoX11Test fails tests > > Martin, can you take a look at > http://ci-logs.kde.flaska.net/0c/0c4039dc8d4c3fa9eed18a4f5604a90648fe3e84/re > builddep/rebuilddep-kf5-qt56-gcc-el7/d8b3c13/shell_output.l

Re: Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-08 Thread David Faure
On Sunday 08 November 2015 15:06:51 Jan Kundrát wrote: > >> [root@ci-el7-a-4 ~]# grep -c opendocument /usr/share/mime/subclasses > >> 0 > >> [root@ci-el7-a-4 ~]# rpm -qf /usr/share/mime/subclasses > >> shared-mime-info-1.1-7.el7.x86_64 OK, clearly CentOS patches the application/zip inheritance ou

Re: Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-08 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Saturday, 7 November 2015 11:59:48 CET, David Faure wrote: Having this for all of KF5 would definitely be useful. And it's done now: http://ci-logs.kde.flaska.net/matrix.html - [5.3] ballo, missing QList::join - [5.3] knewstuff, QTimer::singleShot and new slots - [5.3] modemmanager-qt, ch

Re: Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-08 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Sunday, 8 November 2015 12:17:19 CET, David Faure wrote: Any chance you could do some debugging around there? I'm afraid I don't have time and motivation to fix this, sorry. I'll be happy to spin a VM with an identical setup for you, though, if you're OK with IPv6-only access. If so, pleas

Re: Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-08 Thread Ivan Čukić
>> For how long are we going to support [Qt] 5.3? > > Good question. > > So that we don't need to reopen this discussion regularly, I would like to > suggest a general rule/policy: > > We will always support the last 3 Qt x.y releases. > > Right now that means 5.3 + 5.4 + 5.5. > > When 5.6 is out,

Re: Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-08 Thread David Faure
On Saturday 07 November 2015 21:42:33 Jan Kundrát wrote: > Hi David, > thanks for looking into this. I'm happy that you find the additional > coverage useful. At this time, the infrastructure cannot easily send out > automated e-mails only upon a change in the state of a build job -- if > someon

Re: Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-08 Thread David Faure
On Saturday 07 November 2015 12:55:45 Ivan Čukić wrote: > For how long are we going to support [Qt] 5.3? Good question. So that we don't need to reopen this discussion regularly, I would like to suggest a general rule/policy: We will always support the last 3 Qt x.y releases. Right now that mea

Re: Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-07 Thread Ivan Čukić
Ah, for the *** sake. My fault, I expected that the 'since' tag is missing from that one like it is for setClearColor and didn't check. I've removed the call in question when compiling against Qt 5.3. It will manifest as an issue for people that use dark colour scheme, but since the activities KC

Re: Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-07 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Saturday, 7 November 2015 22:38:16 CET, Ivan Čukić wrote: - [5.3] kactivities: won't build due to QQuickWidget::setClearColor which is 5.4+ only. It should be ok now. I've added a work-around (essentially how the method is implemented in 5.4 and 5.5). kactivities/src/workspace/settings/im

Re: Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-07 Thread Ivan Čukić
> - [5.3] kactivities: won't build due to QQuickWidget::setClearColor which is > 5.4+ only. It should be ok now. I've added a work-around (essentially how the method is implemented in 5.4 and 5.5). Cheers, Ivan ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-

Re: Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-07 Thread Jan Kundrát
Hi David, thanks for looking into this. I'm happy that you find the additional coverage useful. At this time, the infrastructure cannot easily send out automated e-mails only upon a change in the state of a build job -- if someone has some time and is willing to improve this, I'll be happy to w

Re: Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-07 Thread Ivan Čukić
>> - [5.3] kactivities: won't build due to QQuickWidget::setClearColor which >> is 5.4+ only. > > Ivan, can this be worked around? I'll have to check. (if nothing else, I'll disable that part - it is for the settings module, not really a part of the framework) For how long are we going to support

Re: Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-07 Thread David Faure
On Friday 06 November 2015 17:21:33 Jan Kundrát wrote: > Hi folks, > please take a look at the CI status matrix at [1]. TL;DR: There are build > failures with Qt 5.3, plenty of test failures, and some test failures > specific to the still unreleased Qt 5.6. > > Oh, and a cmake 3.4-git regression

Build and test failures with Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.3

2015-11-06 Thread Jan Kundrát
Hi folks, please take a look at the CI status matrix at [1]. TL;DR: There are build failures with Qt 5.3, plenty of test failures, and some test failures specific to the still unreleased Qt 5.6. Oh, and a cmake 3.4-git regression that I'm not going to bother you with. Reported, known, downgra