Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2020-01-09 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 3:03 AM Stephen Kelly wrote: > > > On 28/12/2019 23:30, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Why are you proposing to do a step back instead to the old state, which > > everyone including you considered not that satisfying? > > Because it's a temporary situation. We still

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-30 Thread Dominik Haumann
Hi, Stephen Kelly schrieb am So., 29. Dez. 2019, 15:03: > > On 28/12/2019 23:30, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Why are you proposing to do a step back instead to the old state, which > > everyone including you considered not that satisfying? > > Because it's a temporary situation. We

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-29 Thread Stephen Kelly
On 28/12/2019 23:30, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: Why are you proposing to do a step back instead to the old state, which everyone including you considered not that satisfying? Because it's a temporary situation. We still have a way forward in KF6 (which will open in a few months).

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-28 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Hi Stephen, Am Sonntag, 29. Dezember 2019, 00:10:50 CET schrieb Stephen Kelly: > On 22/12/2019 16:08, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > On 21/12/2019 23:55, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > >> Perhaps joining the "Release Service" (formerly known as "KDE > >> Applications") > >> is a better place then,

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-28 Thread Stephen Kelly
On 22/12/2019 16:08, Stephen Kelly wrote: On 21/12/2019 23:55, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: Perhaps joining the "Release Service" (formerly known as "KDE Applications") is a better place then, it also contains a set of libraries already. That would serve the purpose of having releases

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-23 Thread Volker Krause
On Sunday, 22 December 2019 09:46:02 CET Dominik Haumann wrote: > Hi all, > > in any case, maybe the discussed points should go to the KF6 workboard? > https://phabricator.kde.org/project/view/310/ > > I indeed believe that consistency in the KF5 world is an important feature, > so Friedrich

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-22 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Sonntag, 22. Dezember 2019, 17:08:15 CET schrieb Stephen Kelly: > On 21/12/2019 23:55, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Perhaps joining the "Release Service" (formerly known as "KDE > > Applications") is a better place then, it also contains a set of > > libraries already. That would serve

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-22 Thread Stephen Kelly
On 21/12/2019 23:55, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: Perhaps joining the "Release Service" (formerly known as "KDE Applications") is a better place then, it also contains a set of libraries already. That would serve the purpose of having releases happening regularly. The goals of making

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-22 Thread Dominik Haumann
Hi all, in any case, maybe the discussed points should go to the KF6 workboard? https://phabricator.kde.org/project/view/310/ I indeed believe that consistency in the KF5 world is an important feature, so Friedrich does have a point here. Other framework additions had to adapt as well (what

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-21 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Samstag, 21. Dezember 2019, 23:32:10 CET schrieb Stephen Kelly: > On 21/12/2019 19:12, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Am Samstag, 21. Dezember 2019, 13:03:17 CET schrieb Stephen Kelly: > >> Great, Grantlee is now available at g...@git.kde.org:grantlee.git. > >> > >> I've pushed a few

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
On 21/12/2019 19:12, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: Am Samstag, 21. Dezember 2019, 13:03:17 CET schrieb Stephen Kelly: Great, Grantlee is now available at g...@git.kde.org:grantlee.git. I've pushed a few commits to make it depend on ECM etc. Once the review period is finished it can be

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
On 21/12/2019 21:33, Volker Krause wrote: * Attracting external components and having them opt to move under the Frameworks umbrella is a sign that we are doing things right IMHO. So let's make this easy for people and avoid scaring off their users by forcing a larger migration on them when

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-21 Thread Volker Krause
On Saturday, 21 December 2019 20:12:48 CET Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Am Samstag, 21. Dezember 2019, 13:03:17 CET schrieb Stephen Kelly: > > Great, Grantlee is now available at g...@git.kde.org:grantlee.git. > > > > I've pushed a few commits to make it depend on ECM etc. > > > > Once the

CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-21 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Samstag, 21. Dezember 2019, 13:03:17 CET schrieb Stephen Kelly: > Great, Grantlee is now available at g...@git.kde.org:grantlee.git. > > I've pushed a few commits to make it depend on ECM etc. > > Once the review period is finished it can be part of KF5 releases. There are quite some things