This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit R467:ddd546251022: Set organization name for Wayland icon.
(authored by lesliezhai).
CHANGED PRIOR TO COMMIT
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405?vs=13342&id=15416#toc
REPOSITORY
R467 K3b
CHANGES SINCE L
stikonas added a comment.
> ! In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101683, @graesslin wrote:
> My comment was not meant as a stop-this-effort comment. If we can improve
here to do more sane things I'm all for it.
No, it's not your comment. We were discussing this on #kde-devel and it l
graesslin added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101628, @stikonas wrote:
> Ok, so let us not change kcoreaddons now although it's still something that
could have better default behaviour in KF6.
My comment was not meant as a stop-this-effort comment. If we can impr
stikonas abandoned this revision.
stikonas added a comment.
Ok, so let us not change kcoreaddons now although it's still something that
could have better default behaviour in KF6.
REPOSITORY
R244 KCoreAddons
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405
To: stikonas, mpyne, kossebau
graesslin added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101626, @ltoscano wrote:
> In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101624, @graesslin wrote:
>
> > In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101621, @ltoscano wrote:
> >
> > > In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101615, @grae
ltoscano added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101624, @graesslin wrote:
> In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101621, @ltoscano wrote:
>
> > In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101615, @graesslin wrote:
> >
> > > The desktop file name should follow the way how th
graesslin added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101621, @ltoscano wrote:
> In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101615, @graesslin wrote:
>
> > The desktop file name should follow the way how the dbus name is created.
If the applications are broken, then they are broke
nalvarez added a comment.
Are you saying the d-bus service name should be equal to the .desktop
filename? I don't see where this requirement comes from.
REPOSITORY
R244 KCoreAddons
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405
To: stikonas, mpyne, kossebau, aacid, ltoscano
Cc: nalva
ltoscano added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101615, @graesslin wrote:
> The desktop file name should follow the way how the dbus name is created.
If the applications are broken, then they are broken. Given that I mentioned
this several times at KDE conferences, blogged
graesslin added a comment.
The desktop file name should follow the way how the dbus name is created. If
the applications are broken, then they are broken. Given that I mentioned this
several times at KDE conferences, blogged about it, sent mails to KDE devel
lists I assume the application ma
ltoscano added a comment.
One thing for sure: the code should be moved back to the constructor, and not
dynamically at each call of desktopFileName(), or it would be a behavioral
change. (Or at least it should be probably cached if we get an agreement in
breaking this).
And regarding th
ltoscano added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101577, @kossebau wrote:
> In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101574, @ltoscano wrote:
>
> > I'm still confused. Documentation or not, bad usage or not, is it correct
that desktop file name is constructed from both the o
stikonas added a comment.
In fact API documentation says explicitely that
> IMPORTANT: if the organization domain is set, the .desktop file that
describes your application should have an entry like
X-DBUS-ServiceName=reversed_domain.kmyapp For instance kwrite passes
"http://www.kate-edi
ltoscano added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101575, @mak wrote:
> In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101574, @ltoscano wrote:
>
> > I'm still confused. Documentation or not, bad usage or not, is it correct
that desktop file name is constructed from both the organi
stikonas added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101575, @mak wrote:
> In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101574, @ltoscano wrote:
>
> > I'm still confused. Documentation or not, bad usage or not, is it correct
that desktop file name is constructed from both the organi
kossebau added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101574, @ltoscano wrote:
> I'm still confused. Documentation or not, bad usage or not, is it correct
that desktop file name is constructed from both the organization domain AND the
homepage?
In the current KAboutData
mak added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405#101574, @ltoscano wrote:
> I'm still confused. Documentation or not, bad usage or not, is it correct
that desktop file name is constructed from both the organization domain AND the
homepage?
Yes. See
https://standards.fre
ltoscano added a comment.
I'm still confused. Documentation or not, bad usage or not, is it correct
that desktop file name is constructed from both the organization domain AND the
homepage?
REPOSITORY
R244 KCoreAddons
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5405
To: stikonas, mpyn
kossebau requested changes to this revision.
kossebau added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Having slept over this one night, I still think that this change should be
not the way to go to fix the seen issues.
The actual problem is bad usage in application code, u
stikonas created this revision.
stikonas added a project: Plasma on Wayland.
Restricted Application added subscribers: Frameworks, plasma-devel.
Restricted Application added a project: Frameworks.
REVISION SUMMARY
On Wayland icons are obtained from desktop files that are named
reverseOrganizat
20 matches
Mail list logo
