Hi,
Qt accepts 2012 at least doesn't it? I see KF5 following this a good thing.
>From my perspective of supporting 3rd party devs:
Dependency on 2012 in practice can exist for many reasons, preference and
taste often being the last ones.
If the goal is to have maximum reach for KF5 possible, using
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Kevin Funk wrote:
> On Sunday 16 August 2015 11:19:39 Alex Merry wrote:
> > On 2015-08-13 09:57, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > My experience with MSVC 2013 was that you even need at least Update 4
> > > for initializer lists to work properly, which
On Sunday 16 August 2015 11:19:39 Alex Merry wrote:
> On 2015-08-13 09:57, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > My experience with MSVC 2013 was that you even need at least Update 4
> > for initializer lists to work properly, which was released quite
> > recently iirc.
>
> And even then, initi
On 2015-08-13 09:57, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
Hi,
My experience with MSVC 2013 was that you even need at least Update 4
for initializer lists to work properly, which was released quite
recently iirc.
And even then, initializer lists don't work in all circumstances
(specifically in member initi
-frameworks-devel@kde.org
Betreff: Minimum supported version of MSVC for frameworks
Heya,
I'm writing this to inform you that KF5 is not compilable under MSVC2012 as-is
right now. This is the minimum required version as of [1].
Biggest issues are initializer-lists and non-static data m
Heya,
I'm writing this to inform you that KF5 is not compilable under MSVC2012 as-is
right now. This is the minimum required version as of [1].
Biggest issues are initializer-lists and non-static data member
initialization, default + deleted functions (example patch against kdecoration
here: [
