> On June 26, 2014, 9:29 a.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > this is however not ABI relevant, so depending on schedules one *could*
> > wait for some specified NETWM hint (to not cruft the lib with the gtk+ prop
> > symbol: removing it from the enum is oc. not API stable, thus not possible)
> > a
> On Juni 26, 2014, 7:29 vorm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > this is however not ABI relevant, so depending on schedules one *could*
> > wait for some specified NETWM hint (to not cruft the lib with the gtk+ prop
> > symbol: removing it from the enum is oc. not API stable, thus not possible)
> >
> On June 26, 2014, 7:29 a.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > this is however not ABI relevant, so depending on schedules one *could*
> > wait for some specified NETWM hint (to not cruft the lib with the gtk+ prop
> > symbol: removing it from the enum is oc. not API stable, thus not possible)
> > a
> On June 26, 2014, 9:29 a.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > this is however not ABI relevant, so depending on schedules one *could*
> > wait for some specified NETWM hint (to not cruft the lib with the gtk+ prop
> > symbol: removing it from the enum is oc. not API stable, thus not possible)
> > a
> On June 26, 2014, 7:29 a.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > this is however not ABI relevant, so depending on schedules one *could*
> > wait for some specified NETWM hint (to not cruft the lib with the gtk+ prop
> > symbol: removing it from the enum is oc. not API stable, thus not possible)
> > a
> On June 26, 2014, 9:29 a.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > this is however not ABI relevant, so depending on schedules one *could*
> > wait for some specified NETWM hint (to not cruft the lib with the gtk+ prop
> > symbol: removing it from the enum is oc. not API stable, thus not possible)
> > a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118946/#review60994
---
this is however not ABI relevant, so depending on schedules on
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118946/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and kwin.
Repository: kwindowsystem
D
