Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-04-15 Thread Gregor Mi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/ --- (Updated April 15, 2015, 8:24 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-04-15 Thread Jeremy Whiting
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/#review78995 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jeremy Whiting On April 15, 2015,

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-04-15 Thread Gregor Mi
On April 15, 2015, 8:39 p.m., Jeremy Whiting wrote: Ship It! As KMoreTools is going to be part of KNewStuff it should be using KNEWSTUFF_EXPORT not KSERVICE_EXPORT. The install dir now looks like this: http://wstaw.org/m/2015/04/15/plasma-desktopVd2099.png I wonder if this ok to have a

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-04-15 Thread Jeremy Whiting
On April 15, 2015, 2:39 p.m., Jeremy Whiting wrote: Ship It! Gregor Mi wrote: As KMoreTools is going to be part of KNewStuff it should be using KNEWSTUFF_EXPORT not KSERVICE_EXPORT. The install dir now looks like this:

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-04-15 Thread Gregor Mi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/ --- (Updated April 15, 2015, 9:11 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-04-15 Thread Gregor Mi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/ --- (Updated April 15, 2015, 9:21 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-04-14 Thread Jeremy Whiting
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/#review78941 --- As KMoreTools is going to be part of KNewStuff it should be

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-04-12 Thread Gregor Mi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/ --- (Updated April 12, 2015, 11:54 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-04-12 Thread Gregor Mi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/ --- (Updated April 12, 2015, 11:17 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-04-02 Thread Gregor Mi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/ --- (Updated April 2, 2015, 4:48 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-03-22 Thread Gregor Mi
On March 15, 2015, 10:31 a.m., Dominik Haumann wrote: src/kmoretools/kmoretools.h, line 394 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/diff/1/?file=354447#file354447line394 Do we need the kmt-prefix? Why not just KMoreToolsService * service(); Gregor Mi wrote: I am not

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-03-22 Thread Gregor Mi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/ --- (Updated March 22, 2015, 12:37 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-03-22 Thread Gregor Mi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/ --- (Updated March 22, 2015, 7:41 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-03-15 Thread Gregor Mi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/#review77511 --- src/kmoretools/kmoretools.cpp

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-03-15 Thread Gregor Mi
On March 15, 2015, 10:31 a.m., Dominik Haumann wrote: src/kmoretools/kmoretools.h, line 36 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/diff/1/?file=354447#file354447line36 Proper doxygen would look like this: The first sentence is always the brief documentation. Currently,

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-03-15 Thread Gregor Mi
On March 15, 2015, 10:31 a.m., Dominik Haumann wrote: src/kmoretools/kmoretools.h, line 394 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/diff/1/?file=354447#file354447line394 Do we need the kmt-prefix? Why not just KMoreToolsService * service(); I am not completely that happy

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-03-15 Thread Gregor Mi
On March 15, 2015, 10:31 a.m., Dominik Haumann wrote: src/kmoretools/kmoretools.h, line 287 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/diff/1/?file=354447#file354447line287 @return, never @returns. Further, can you be mor verbose? @return Returns the tools

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-03-15 Thread Kevin Funk
On March 15, 2015, 10:31 a.m., Dominik Haumann wrote: src/kmoretools/kmoretools.h, line 412 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/diff/1/?file=354447#file354447line412 Qt API never returns a this pointer when settings some properties. While not explicitely stated

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-03-15 Thread Dominik Haumann
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/#review77502 --- I don't think that the patch in it's current form is ok to

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-03-15 Thread Gregor Mi
On March 15, 2015, 10:31 a.m., Dominik Haumann wrote: src/kmoretools/kmoretools.h, line 412 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/diff/1/?file=354447#file354447line412 Qt API never returns a this pointer when settings some properties. While not explicitely stated

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-03-15 Thread Gregor Mi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/ --- (Updated March 15, 2015, 5:07 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-03-15 Thread Gregor Mi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/ --- (Updated March 15, 2015, 5:18 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-03-15 Thread Dominik Haumann
On March 15, 2015, 10:31 a.m., Dominik Haumann wrote: src/kmoretools/kmoretools.h, line 287 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/diff/1/?file=354447#file354447line287 @return, never @returns. Further, can you be mor verbose? @return Returns the tools

Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-03-11 Thread Gregor Mi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks, Emmanuel Pescosta and Jeremy Whiting.

Re: Review Request 122910: Introduce KMoreTools

2015-03-11 Thread Gregor Mi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122910/ --- (Updated March 11, 2015, 11:06 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks,