Em Segunda-feira 16. Novembro 2009, às 11.12.16, Cornelius Schumacher
escreveu:
> On Monday 16 November 2009 09:28:31 Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > Therefore I recommend one repository per application, in some cases
> > application + library (say konqueror + libkonq in one repository).
>
> I see your
On Monday 16 November 2009 09:28:31 Simon Hausmann wrote:
>
> Therefore I recommend one repository per application, in some cases
> application + library (say konqueror + libkonq in one repository).
I see your points and they reflect my experience as well. I have one question,
though: With very
In <20091113211505.ga5...@ugly.local>, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 08:54:22PM +0100, Thomas Zander wrote:
>> On Friday 13. November 2009 11.51.04 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> > and before you ask (again): i have no resources to work on it. but i
>> > sure will have the resour
[Ian Monroe | Tuesday 17 November 2009]
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > On Monday 16 November 2009 04:16:10 pm Chani wrote:
> >> On November 16, 2009 13:52:58 Ingmar Vanhassel wrote:
> >> > Excerpts from Chani's message of Mon Nov 16 22:26:16 +0100 2009:
> >> > > interest
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Ian Monroe wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Matt Rogers wrote:
>> On Monday 16 November 2009 04:16:10 pm Chani wrote:
>>> On November 16, 2009 13:52:58 Ingmar Vanhassel wrote:
>>> > Excerpts from Chani's message of Mon Nov 16 22:26:16 +0100 2009:
>>> > >
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Matt Rogers wrote:
> On Monday 16 November 2009 04:16:10 pm Chani wrote:
>> On November 16, 2009 13:52:58 Ingmar Vanhassel wrote:
>> > Excerpts from Chani's message of Mon Nov 16 22:26:16 +0100 2009:
>> > > interesting...
>> > > given that packagers have to split u
On Monday 16 November 2009 04:16:10 pm Chani wrote:
> On November 16, 2009 13:52:58 Ingmar Vanhassel wrote:
> > Excerpts from Chani's message of Mon Nov 16 22:26:16 +0100 2009:
> > > interesting...
> > > given that packagers have to split up kde applications anyways, could
> > > it be *good* to off
On November 16, 2009 13:52:58 Ingmar Vanhassel wrote:
> Excerpts from Chani's message of Mon Nov 16 22:26:16 +0100 2009:
> > interesting...
> > given that packagers have to split up kde applications anyways, could it
> > be *good* to offer individual tarballs? if so, wouldn't now be the least
> > p
Excerpts from Chani's message of Mon Nov 16 22:26:16 +0100 2009:
> interesting...
> given that packagers have to split up kde applications anyways, could it be
> *good* to offer individual tarballs? if so, wouldn't now be the least painful
> time to make such a change? what if kdegames was a gito
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 01:26:16PM -0800, Chani Armitage wrote:
> what's p4i? what does "merge up" mean? :)
>
:D
p4i is a troll-internal script. it kinda-automated forward-porting
changes from stable to master when we still used perforce (p4).
in git, you just check out master and "git merge stabl
>
> > - the sizes of the Git object dbs are larger
>
> i think you posted some numbers before, but would you mind refreshing
> our memory?
> irrespective of the actual numbers i'd venture the guess that on
> average, individual developers would still save disk space, as they
> wouldn't have to d
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:19:19PM +0100, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em Segunda-feira 16 Novembro 2009, às 09:28:31, você escreveu:
> > Git scales well with repositories, it does not scale well with the number
> > or files inside a repository. That applies to the performance as well as
> > the merg
Em Segunda-feira 16 Novembro 2009, às 19:30:13, você escreveu:
> > Some more stats. I said that I doubted that KDE had any module with 100
> > active committers. Let's define what an active committer is:
> >
> > At least 5 commits / month. So in the 7 months, we need 35 commits. Under
> > that ru
> Some more stats. I said that I doubted that KDE had any module with 100
> active committers. Let's define what an active committer is:
>
> At least 5 commits / month. So in the 7 months, we need 35 commits. Under
> that rule, we have:
> Qt: 71
> kdelibs: 29
> kdebase: 29
>
2009/11/16 Thiago Macieira :
> Em Segunda-feira 16 Novembro 2009, às 09:28:31, você escreveu:
>> I agree with Oswald here.
>>
>> Git scales well with repositories, it does not scale well with the number
>> or files inside a repository. That applies to the performance as well as
>> the merging woe
Em Segunda-feira 16 Novembro 2009, às 18:19:19, você escreveu:
> In the 7 months between April and October, there were 4823 commits in
> kdebase trunk (avg 22 commits / day). There were 189 committers, with the
> Top 10 committing 2819 times (58%), and with 80% of the commits being done
> by 29
Em Segunda-feira 16 Novembro 2009, às 09:28:31, você escreveu:
> On Thursday 12 November 2009 ext Oswald Buddenhagen, wrote:
> > > -> every module in KDE gets a repo, every project in support/extragear
> > >gets a repo, koffice gets a repo
> > > -> subprojects, like games or edu might choose to
On Thursday 12 November 2009 ext Oswald Buddenhagen, wrote:
> > -> every module in KDE gets a repo, every project in support/extragear
> >gets a repo, koffice gets a repo
> > -> subprojects, like games or edu might choose to have a repo per app,
> >however, they will have to help out then.
18 matches
Mail list logo
