Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-20 Thread Eike Hein
On 02/20/2010 06:26 PM, Thomas Zander wrote: > Did you report a bug to them? Markey - the Amarok peeps are having the same problem - talked to them, yeah. -- Best regards, Eike Hein ___ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org https://m

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-20 Thread John Tapsell
On 20 February 2010 17:26, Thomas Zander wrote: > On Saturday 20. February 2010 17.25.05 Eike Hein wrote: >> On 02/20/2010 05:19 PM, John Tapsell wrote: >> > isn't this done now?  In http://gitorious.org/favorites   it shows >> > every repo that I'm signed up to and a drop down as to whether to >>

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-20 Thread Thomas Zander
On Saturday 20. February 2010 17.25.05 Eike Hein wrote: > On 02/20/2010 05:19 PM, John Tapsell wrote: > > isn't this done now? In http://gitorious.org/favorites it shows > > every repo that I'm signed up to and a drop down as to whether to > > email commit messages or not. > > The watchable obj

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-20 Thread Eike Hein
On 02/20/2010 05:19 PM, John Tapsell wrote: > isn't this done now? In http://gitorious.org/favorites it shows > every repo that I'm signed up to and a drop down as to whether to > email commit messages or not. The watchable objects business is broken in other ways, though. In order to get mails

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-20 Thread John Tapsell
>From the MoveToGit > Gitorious Needs a feature to disable merge request emails for certain repos isn't this done now? In http://gitorious.org/favorites it shows every repo that I'm signed up to and a drop down as to whether to email commit messages or not. John __

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-20 Thread Chani
On February 18, 2010 02:22:44 Thomas Zander wrote: > On Wednesday 17. February 2010 20.09.48 Michael Jansen wrote: > > Moving to git is not only a technical problem. It's a communication > > problem > > > > too. And the last part is probally much more important. At least imho. > > If the move s