Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> I'm working on a Kate syntax highlighting script for rule
> files. It's working quite well, although a few things aren't yet
> supported.
>
> You may download it from:
> http://gitweb.kde.org/scratch/nalvarez/svn2git-kate.git
>
> Just copy svn2git.xml to ~/.kde/share/apps
Am 12/5/2010 23:03, schrieb Ian Monroe:
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:01 PM, John Tapsell wrote:
>> On 5 December 2010 14:12, Ian Monroe wrote:
>>> [250mb]
>
> That's just the .git.
Did you try
git repack -a -d -f --depth=250 --window=250
(note, this takes *time* and *memory*)?
-- Hannes
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:01 PM, John Tapsell wrote:
> On 5 December 2010 14:12, Ian Monroe wrote:
>> I'm of exactly the same opinion. The whole of kdelibs is 250mb
>
> Is that the size of just the .git directory, or includes the checked
> out kdelibs?
>
> How big is it just for the checked out fi
On 5 December 2010 14:12, Ian Monroe wrote:
> I'm of exactly the same opinion. The whole of kdelibs is 250mb
Is that the size of just the .git directory, or includes the checked
out kdelibs?
How big is it just for the checked out files?
John
___
Kde-s
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05-12-2010 10:15, Dominik Haumann wrote:
>> On Sunday, 5. December 2010, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 02:26:52AM +, Tom Albers wrote:
> On Sat
On Sunday 05 December 2010 16:18:49 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> On 05-12-2010 10:15, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> > On Sunday, 5. December 2010, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> >> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 02:26:52AM +, Tom Albers wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Andreas Pakulat wro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05-12-2010 10:15, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> On Sunday, 5. December 2010, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 02:26:52AM +, Tom Albers wrote:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Hi Ian, I'm not sure
- Original Message -
> On Sunday 05 December 2010 10.30.51 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 08:12:20AM +0100, Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> > > An objection here, to do this with the rules will silently alter
> > > history.
> >
> > i think that's the whole idea here. the ent
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> On Sunday 05 December 2010 05:30:53 Ian Monroe wrote:
>> I've done a trial run of a kdelibs git conversion and published it here:
>> http://gitweb.kde.org/scratch/ianmonroe/kdelibs-test.git
>> It should have a fairly comprehensive history
On Sunday 05 December 2010 10.30.51 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 08:12:20AM +0100, Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> > An objection here, to do this with the rules will silently alter
> > history.
>
> i think that's the whole idea here. the entire kate history is already
> in a separat
On Sunday 05 December 2010 10:30:51 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 08:12:20AM +0100, Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> > An objection here, to do this with the rules will silently alter
> > history.
>
> i think that's the whole idea here. the entire kate history is already
> in a separat
On Sunday 05 December 2010 05:30:53 Ian Monroe wrote:
> I've done a trial run of a kdelibs git conversion and published it here:
> http://gitweb.kde.org/scratch/ianmonroe/kdelibs-test.git
> It should have a fairly comprehensive history thanks to Torgny Nyblom
> trackModule.pl script. Feedback appre
On Sunday 05 December 2010 10:30:51 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 08:12:20AM +0100, Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> > An objection here, to do this with the rules will silently alter
> > history.
>
> i think that's the whole idea here. the entire kate history is already
> in a separat
On Sunday, 5. December 2010, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 02:26:52AM +, Tom Albers wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > > Hi Ian, I'm not sure wether you're aware of the previous
> > > > discussions about this or not, but the kate dev
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 08:12:20AM +0100, Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> An objection here, to do this with the rules will silently alter
> history.
>
i think that's the whole idea here. the entire kate history is already
in a separate repo, so unless one'd want to be able to check out
historically accurat
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 02:26:52AM +, Tom Albers wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > Hi Ian, I'm not sure wether you're aware of the previous discussions
> > > about this or not, but the kate devs would like to remove at least
> > > the
> > > kate-dir from k
Hi all,
Writing svn2git import rules, but hate seeing all-black code? This is just
what you need. I'm working on a Kate syntax highlighting script for rule
files. It's working quite well, although a few things aren't yet supported.
You may download it from:
http://gitweb.kde.org/scratch/nalvare
17 matches
Mail list logo
