On Saturday 25 June 2011, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> On Thursday 23 June 2011 14:13:01 Ian Monroe wrote:
> > I'm thinking we should have a KDE Git transition BoF. One thought
> > is that the Git BoF happen after the release team BoF so that they
> > can be given the opportunity to add stuff to
On Saturday 06 November 2010, Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> On Saturday 06 November 2010 12.50.34 Tom Albers wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:49, Torgny Nyblom
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > kdepimlibs will be kdepimlibs in git as well.
> >
> > It would make sense to split kdepimlibs though.
> >
> >
On Wednesday 08 September 2010, Chani wrote:
> On September 8, 2010 03:21:38 zan...@kde.org wrote:
> > On Tuesday 7. September 2010 18.04.40 Tom Albers wrote:
> now I'm gonna play devil^Wsysadmin's advocate for a minute here ;)
>
> > Ignored disadvantages;
> > * having each app in koffice as a rep
On Wednesday 08 September 2010, Tom Albers wrote:
> Don't twist my words please. I've indicated that I assumed the list
> was about bikeshedding about the tool, and never considered it to be
> a decision making list. I still find the name of the list confusing.
So, because you find the name of the
On Wednesday 08 September 2010, Ian Monroe wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Tom Albers wrote:
> > Again, we advise you to go for a split approach, if the list does
> > not want that, it is fine. Just solve the problems we address in
> > the document and accept the technical consequences it
On Tuesday 07 September 2010, Tom Albers wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 13:03:28 -0700, Chani wrote:
> > -I don't understand the fuss over reviewboard. currently, reviews
> > are sent to groups, independent of where the code is located: for
> > example, a plasma review request could be for code in kd
On Monday 12 July 2010, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> Heya :)
>
> We had a very good discussion about how to improve communication to
> the rest of the community about our move to git. In the last months
> we've honestly been rather bad with that every now and then. I've
> seen sentences like "You're s
On Sunday 28 March 2010, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> On Sunday 28 March 2010 Thomas Zander wrote:
> > $ git clone git://gitorious.org/svn2git/kde-ruleset.git
> > $ grep 'create repository' kde-ruleset/*
> >
> > Each of those lines will be its own project with one or more
> > repositories.
>
> A
On Sunday 07 March 2010, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 07.03.10 19:33:22, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 07.03.10 19:26:26, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > today I freed enough space on my harddisk for KDE svn, but I'm
> > > no
Hi,
today I freed enough space on my harddisk for KDE svn, but I'm not able
to rsync the KDE svn database. I always get
# ./startSync
receiving incremental file list
rsync: change_dir "/home/kde" (in svnmirror) failed: No such file or
directory (2)
sent 4 bytes received 6 bytes 20.00 bytes/s
On Saturday 06 February 2010, Ian Monroe wrote:
> 2010/2/6 Thiago Macieira :
> > Em Sábado 6. Fevereiro 2010, às 23.16.25, Ingo Klöcker escreveu:
> >> On Saturday 06 February 2010, Patrick J. Volkerding wrote:
> >> > Please don't ruin KDE. Having a reasonable
On Saturday 06 February 2010, Patrick J. Volkerding wrote:
> Please don't ruin KDE. Having a reasonable number of source tarballs
> is one of KDE's greatest strengths. It's nice to see a project of
> KDE's complexity that can be compiled by a technically-inclined end
> user, and not only by the p
On Sunday 31 January 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em Domingo 31. Janeiro 2010, às 14.39.31, Maciej Mrozowski escreveu:
> > What packagers are you referring to Thiago? Dirk and Co. or distro
> > packagers?
>
> Distro packagers.
>
> > Source distro packagers (like here in Gentoo) surely prefer
>
On Sunday 29 November 2009, Ian Monroe wrote:
> 2009/11/28 ComputerDruid :
> > I just read on the gitorious blog about a solution to the problem
> > we had about having too many people emailed about merge requests.
> > From the wording used, it seems that this was done specifically for
> > us (alth
On Thursday 12 November 2009, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > user accounts (gitorous accounts need to have a realname)
> > ** get opt-in privacy agreement. TASK: eean. (coordinate with
> > johann)
>
> Everyone that every has had an svn account has his info publicly
> available (see accounts files), wha
15 matches
Mail list logo
