Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdegames' move to Git

2010-06-28 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Monday 28 of June 2010 13:56:52 Chani wrote: > On Sunday, June 27, 2010 10:46:03 am Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:32:42PM -0500, Ian Monroe wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Tom Albers wrote: > > > > Moving KMail from kdepim to extragear would not be poss

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdegames' move to Git

2010-06-28 Thread Tom Albers
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 04:54:18 -0700, Chani wrote: > also, iirc thiago once said that moving something *in* is relatively easy, > it's moving it out again that's harder. We also move things out, like libraries that are first created in kdepim and when a second user needs it, it moves to kdepimlib

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdegames' move to Git

2010-06-28 Thread Jens-Michael Hoffmann
Am Sonntag, 27. Juni 2010, 23:22:00 schrieb Thomas Zander: > On Sunday 27. June 2010 21.45.45 Jens-Michael Hoffmann wrote: > > > > IIRC, "the ones who do the work" wanted monolithic Git repos for some > > > > reasons and "the ones who wanted split packages" for some other > > > > reasons did not ha

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdegames' move to Git

2010-06-28 Thread Chani
On Sunday, June 27, 2010 10:46:03 am Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:32:42PM -0500, Ian Monroe wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Tom Albers wrote: > > > Moving KMail from kdepim to extragear would not be possible while > > > preserving the history. This is imho im

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdegames' move to Git

2010-06-28 Thread Chani
On Sunday, June 27, 2010 11:09:04 am Albert Astals Cid wrote: > A Diumenge, 27 de juny de 2010, vàreu escriure: > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > A Diumenge, 27 de juny de 2010, Ian Monroe va escriure: > > >> > But this gets complicated when all apps are into one

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdegames' move to Git

2010-06-27 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:22:00PM +0200, Thomas Zander wrote: > The rulesets are the product of the work done by people that, well > follow up on the decision. And they are not splitting modules. > > Its a made decision, many many manhours have been going in after that > decision was made executi

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdegames' move to Git

2010-06-27 Thread Thomas Zander
On Sunday 27. June 2010 21.45.45 Jens-Michael Hoffmann wrote: > > > IIRC, "the ones who do the work" wanted monolithic Git repos for some > > > reasons and "the ones who wanted split packages" for some other reasons > > > did not have the time to do the work. In KDE world, that's a decision. > > >

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdegames' move to Git

2010-06-27 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Diumenge, 27 de juny de 2010, vàreu escriure: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > A Diumenge, 27 de juny de 2010, Ian Monroe va escriure: > >> > But this gets complicated when all apps are into one big module based > >> > repository. Moving KMail from kdepim to extra

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdegames' move to Git

2010-06-27 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:32:42PM -0500, Ian Monroe wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Tom Albers wrote: > > Moving KMail from kdepim to extragear would not be possible while > > preserving the history. This is imho important to know and consider. > > I don't think this is true. It's not