On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 05:41:56PM +0200, Simon Eugster wrote:
> Suggestions:
> * Let's go through all reports until Dec 31, 2010 (to have a clear boundary).
It's a bit ahead still, did you mean Dec 31, 2009?
> * Comment on each report, even it is still valid, so that we do
> not do duplicate w
Suggestions:
* Let's go through all reports until Dec 31, 2010 (to have a clear boundary).
* Comment on each report, even it is still valid, so that we do not do
duplicate work
* Start with the oldest ones ;) Nearly 80 % of all reports are from 2009.
2010/4/1 Hugh Tebby :
> I'll probably have a go
I'll probably have a go at cleaning up next week-end, maybe even during the
week if I have a bit of time in the evenings.
First objective : get the bug count down by 100 !
2010/4/1 Simon Eugster
> 2010/4/1 Albert ARIBAUD :
> > To speed things up, I can already tell bug 436 is still relevant. :
2010/4/1 Albert ARIBAUD :
> To speed things up, I can already tell bug 436 is still relevant. :)
Yeah, that's gonna speed up the process a lot :)
I agree that a cleanup is necessary.
Perhaps I might even have time to help next week.
Simon
Hugh Tebby a ?crit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was looking round the Mantis reports and there are 582 reports :
> - 129 crash
> - 84 major
> - 178 minor
> - 166 feature requests
> - a few "tweaks" and "trivial"
>
> Some of the reports are nearly two years old, quite a lot are awaiting
> an answer fr
Hi everyone,
I was looking round the Mantis reports and there are 582 reports :
- 129 crash
- 84 major
- 178 minor
- 166 feature requests
- a few "tweaks" and "trivial"
Some of the reports are nearly two years old, quite a lot are awaiting an
answer from the original reporter.
I think some pret
