On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:34:48 +0100
DogFilm wrote:
> why bother? ahmm, this was a suggestion. in the beginning of software,
> there is nothing. if people said 'why bother' there would be no software
> at all. furtunately people bother a lot and want things to evolve, make
> progress - this is some
why bother? ahmm, this was a suggestion. in the beginning of software,
there is nothing. if people said 'why bother' there would be no software at
all. furtunately people bother a lot and want things to evolve, make
progress - this is something that created the whole world around you. it is
not alw
Le 31/01/2017 à 17:39, DogFilm a écrit :
yes, of course not every device has a sync signal. However, most devices
allow for a "free run" time sync signal,
Watever, the devs choose to use an other method and it usually works
very well, so why bother?
this saves me lot of time
jdd
yes, of course not every device has a sync signal. However, most devices
allow for a "free run" time sync signal, that is you have "real time" or
"global time" or "the actual time" as a timecode on all your devices - this
is also shown in the video and you can see there, how helpful it is when
the
Le 31/01/2017 à 15:20, DogFilm a écrit :
Looks like this is what I called "manual" editing or like you describe
it seems to be quite near to that. I will play around a little bit more,
however it is problematic if you have only audio as a sync reference.
With many cams you can produce material wi
Looks like this is what I called "manual" editing or like you describe it
seems to be quite near to that. I will play around a little bit more,
however it is problematic if you have only audio as a sync reference. With
many cams you can produce material with the same global timecode, what is a
very
Le 31/01/2017 à 13:02, DogFilm a écrit :
That is interesting, jdd! Would you like to explain your workflow
it's pretty easy.
I use two video camcorder, so two video/sound tracks. Usually the one
that have the better audio is the central one, but there the video is
boring, so my second cam wh
That is interesting, jdd! Would you like to explain your workflow - I could
not find anything that helps me with multicam editing so I was falling back
to putting material on one timeline (as there is the concept of only one
fixed timeline in kdenlive as I understand) and adjusting videos manually
Hi John,
All the features a video editor software needs are already on our road
map.
Multicam editing and advanced timeline nesting are just two of them:
https://old.kdenlive.org/node/9458
So just be patient and partecipate, as you just did by writing this
email, to the Kdenlive community.
We'
Le 24/12/2016 à 19:33, DogFilm a écrit :
- centering the workflow around one timeline in fact is a key
misconception in most video editors.
depends of your needs... it's perfect for me
but I don't do movies but shows recording with up to 3 cams and one more
sound recorder
jdd
Le 24/12/2016 à 19:33, DogFilm a écrit :
I was disappointed to not find any reasonable concept of syncing
multicam material - a very important thing that a video editor could
help a lot, if it supported it.
syncing cams works for me and I use it routinely (sync by audio)
jdd
Hi, happy holodays!
Just tried to quickly edit some xmas footage and just for the fun of it I
wanted to use kdenlive to explore the new stable version a bit.
I was disappointed to not find any reasonable concept of syncing multicam
material - a very important thing that a video editor could help
12 matches
Mail list logo