Re: Procedure(s) for removing Kerberos

2003-01-23 Thread those who know me have no need of my name
in comp.protocols.kerberos i read: >We have Kerberos(an old 4 version I believe) installed on many of our Unix >systems. It was installed by someone who has since gone. Problem now is >that we want to remove Kerberos but have no idea what that entails. this seems a foolish notion, but whatever

Re: SSH with Kerberos 5 GSSAPI

2002-03-22 Thread those who know me have no need of my name
[fu-t set] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged: >I just compiled SSH v3.0.2p1 with the GSSAPI patch included. as an aside, you should updated, that versions has a local exploit that will elevate to root. -- bringing you boring signatures for 17 years

Re: Telnet Encryption Options vs. Kerberos V5

2001-12-10 Thread those who know me have no need of my name
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged: >"Salil Dangi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> We are treating this field to be an unsigned integer of one byte. With this >> assumption, the value is 129 and not negative 1. > >Nit pick: 129 or 0x81 would actually be -127. 255 or 0xff would be -1. given certain, ot

Re: telnet - encryption

2001-11-27 Thread those who know me have no need of my name
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged: >as I read from the Kerberos documentation the kerberized version of telnet >can use an encrypted mode. > >Does that mean, that all the traffic, that travels over that connection is >encypted? Or does it mean, that only passwords are encrypted? typically it means th

Re: hello

2001-10-05 Thread those who know me have no need of my name
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged: >I need some help configuring 1 server and 5 clients/slaves with kerberos >5... Does anyone out there have a clean cut way of installing kerberos >5 on RedHat Linux 7.1 rpm -i does it for me. then a little configuring, according to the docs, and you are pretty

Re: kerberos ftp and >4GB file sizes (or any application for that matter)

2001-10-03 Thread those who know me have no need of my name
divulged: >I'm not sure this is the right place to ask, but I'm using RH7.0 on a intel >system using kernel 2.4.2 which supports >4GB files. in general i'd suggest a linux development mailing list or redhat's support forums. >LOTS of applications have trouble with

Re: fatal: Symbol referencing errors

2001-09-27 Thread those who know me have no need of my name
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged: >If this is on Linux (at least Redhat), there is no libresolv.a, there >is only a dynamically linkable version. (i.e. /lib/libresolv-2.2.2.so). > >I've run into this when trying to link things with -static on Redhat. >I haven't found an acceptable solution yet.

Re: KSU works but gives extra output under AIX 4.3.3 ML08

2001-09-13 Thread those who know me have no need of my name
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged: >I used to just get the first message, but now I get double messages. It >seems like I'm getting syslog output to the screen too. is syslogd running? do you have an action of /dev/console for any selector? -- okay, have a sig then

Re: kerberos auth against w2k server with 8 bit chars in password

2001-08-23 Thread those who know me have no need of my name
<9m31ge$ej9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged: >Actually, nobody adheres to the standard. Not MIT, not Heimdal, not >Microsoft. The RFC says that the principal name is a ASN.1 GeneralString >which means that all strings other than plain ASCII must be encoded >using ISO-2022 escape sequences. that'

Re: kerberos auth against w2k server with 8 bit chars in password

2001-08-23 Thread those who know me have no need of my name
<9m1qqa$jme$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged: >Windows 2000 represents non-ASCII characters as UTF-8 strings >MIT and Heimdal represent them as 8-bit ISO-Latin1. Therefore, >this will not work. you could hack the source to use utf-8 encoding (horrible as that encoding is), but you'd have to be sure