in comp.protocols.kerberos i read:
>We have Kerberos(an old 4 version I believe) installed on many of our Unix
>systems. It was installed by someone who has since gone. Problem now is
>that we want to remove Kerberos but have no idea what that entails.
this seems a foolish notion, but whatever
[fu-t set]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged:
>I just compiled SSH v3.0.2p1 with the GSSAPI patch included.
as an aside, you should updated, that versions has a local exploit that
will elevate to root.
--
bringing you boring signatures for 17 years
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged:
>"Salil Dangi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> We are treating this field to be an unsigned integer of one byte. With this
>> assumption, the value is 129 and not negative 1.
>
>Nit pick: 129 or 0x81 would actually be -127. 255 or 0xff would be -1.
given certain, ot
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged:
>as I read from the Kerberos documentation the kerberized version of telnet
>can use an encrypted mode.
>
>Does that mean, that all the traffic, that travels over that connection is
>encypted? Or does it mean, that only passwords are encrypted?
typically it means th
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged:
>I need some help configuring 1 server and 5 clients/slaves with kerberos
>5... Does anyone out there have a clean cut way of installing kerberos
>5 on RedHat Linux 7.1
rpm -i does it for me. then a little configuring, according to the docs,
and you are pretty
divulged:
>I'm not sure this is the right place to ask, but I'm using RH7.0 on a intel
>system using kernel 2.4.2 which supports >4GB files.
in general i'd suggest a linux development mailing list or redhat's
support forums.
>LOTS of applications have trouble with
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged:
>If this is on Linux (at least Redhat), there is no libresolv.a, there
>is only a dynamically linkable version. (i.e. /lib/libresolv-2.2.2.so).
>
>I've run into this when trying to link things with -static on Redhat.
>I haven't found an acceptable solution yet.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged:
>I used to just get the first message, but now I get double messages. It
>seems like I'm getting syslog output to the screen too.
is syslogd running? do you have an action of /dev/console for any
selector?
--
okay, have a sig then
<9m31ge$ej9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged:
>Actually, nobody adheres to the standard. Not MIT, not Heimdal, not
>Microsoft. The RFC says that the principal name is a ASN.1 GeneralString
>which means that all strings other than plain ASCII must be encoded
>using ISO-2022 escape sequences.
that'
<9m1qqa$jme$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged:
>Windows 2000 represents non-ASCII characters as UTF-8 strings
>MIT and Heimdal represent them as 8-bit ISO-Latin1. Therefore,
>this will not work.
you could hack the source to use utf-8 encoding (horrible as that encoding
is), but you'd have to be sure
10 matches
Mail list logo