> "mwood" == Mark H Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mwood> Probably one's lawyers should talk to MIT's lawyers about what
mwood> would be acceptable to both parties. Take a look at the README
mwood> file at the top of the source tree (section "Copyright Notice
mwood> and Legal Administrivia
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:31:16PM +, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> >> "hot" == hot ice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [snip]
> > hot> - If this
> > hot> is allowed are there any credits or acknowledgements that I hot>
> > need to provide while shipping my product?
> >
> > Unclear. I don't preten
Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi. I'm trying to be helpful and answering your question. I speak
> for myself not for the MIT Kerberos team.
>
>
>> "hot" == hot ice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> hot> - If this
> hot> is allowed are there any credits or acknowledgements
Hi. I'm trying to be helpful and answering your question. I speak
for myself not for the MIT Kerberos team.
> "hot" == hot ice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
hot> Hello everyone - This is a newbie question. I would like to
hot> use the Kerberos algorithm but have my own implementat
Hello everyone - This is a newbie question.
I would like to use the Kerberos algorithm but have my own
implementation i.e. not use the MIT libraries. My question is:
- Is this a violation of the licensing agreement?
- If this is allowed are there any credits or acknowledgements that I
need to pr
