Hello,
We ran automated tests on the following kernel build:
Kernel package: kernel-5.11.12-200.fc33
Task URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=65454832
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: PASSED
Tests: OK
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/39#note_547946553
It is an important distinction that the typical package has an upstream
source repository, and dist-git. We have essentially 2 different
upstream repositories and dist-git, so having the date
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/39#note_547944992
kernel-5.11.0-155
kernel-5.11.0-156
kernel-5.11.0-157
kernel-5.11.0-158
These are tags by an autogenerated by scripts and have nothing to do
with dist-git because most of them were not used.
From: David Ward on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/39#note_547939066
Sorry if I am misunderstanding something. I was saying that for
`kernel-5.12.0-0.rc6.20210408git454859c5.186` we should make the date
(`20210408`) correspond to the upstream commit (`454859c5
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/39#note_547885204
https://www.kernel.org/ for reference.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/39#note_547881033
rc releases such as kernel-5.12.0-0.rc6.184 are built as release kernels
which is why they differ. It is an actual upstream release.
___
kernel
From: David Ward on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/39#note_547864291
We can't rely on that, because a date is only used for snapshotting.
`kernel-5.12.0-0.rc6.184` does not have a date in it, but everything you
mentioned still applies; you could rebuild the same
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/39#note_547745411
Date in this case is very much important and different in that the git
commit there is the upstream (Linus tree) commit, and not the kernel-ark
commit id. Date gives us a bit more information as
From: David Ward on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/39#note_547733607
My guess would be that the script would already have become confused at
this point, given that `` was added.
Related to ``: it contains the date that the [RPM source files
are
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/39#note_547725975
The decision to drop `` to 1 was made after 5.12 started as the
numbers are climbing inconsistently with what we want. Realistically
100/200/300 have special meaning for Fedora stable releases,
From: David Ward on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/39#note_547716096
I agree this is outside of Fedora here (although the NVR is not being
changed for Rawhide, which is a different matter).
I wanted to clarify: in the example above, you would have `Release:
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/39#note_547598365
As a prerelease kernel, we have never relied on for ordering, nor
should we. This is not a valid 5.12 release. 5.12.0-1 should supercede
it. I will say that the release bump is not entirely
12 matches
Mail list logo
