From: Hangbin Liu on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/994#note_563249793
Thanks Simo for the explanation.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1060#note_563122710
Looks good to me. I will definitely give it a good workout when I start
moving the Fedora configs
___
kernel mailing list --
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1060#note_563115471
@jmflinuxtx @ptalbert - I think this fixes our empty config problem.
Not entirely sure. It addresses Justin's case.
___
kernel mailing list --
From: Don Zickus
Don't create empty pending-common files on pending-fedora commits
There is a bug in gen_config_patches.sh which will assumes all new
configs are in redhat/configs/pending-common. This is not true
for pending-fedora configs. As a result the script reads the
pending-feodra
From: CKI Gitlab on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1057
NOTE: Truncated patchset due to missing @redhat.com email
address on your GitLab profile at https://gitlab.com/-/profile.
Once that is fixed, close and reopen the merge request
From: Simo Sorce on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/994#note_562929408
@liuhangbin @dzickusrh
We do not have a better solution.
The stuff proposed by Jason upstream was speculative and is highly
invasive and we are *not* planning to do that work. Neither
Hi Fedora users, developers, and friends!
It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 35.
For anyone who isn't aware, a Test Day is an event usually focused
around IRC for interaction and a Wiki page for instructions and results,
with the aim being to get a bunch of interested users
Hi,
I tried building the current rawhide branch using "--with vanilla". It errors
immediately:
error: line 520: Invalid version (double separator '-'):
5.12.0-198.fc32.x86_64-vanilla: Requires: kernel-core-uname-r =
5.12.0-198.fc32.x86_64-vanilla
Is "--with vanilla" broken for rahwide's
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1024#note_562824788
While I am not particularly happy about it, I understand the situation.
I said it could be merged when it gets the acks, as the code is RHEL
only, and the patch will be dropped from
From: Mike Snitzer on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1024#note_562815833
@jmflinuxtx please provide an update on what you intend to do with this
MR.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
From: David Ward on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/39#note_562688620
> We can't use the exact moment [...] It could be that date I suppose.
Though there is nothing there that guarantees it matches what was
tagged.
This is what I meant. I'd like to create a MR that
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/39#note_562665828
Of note, I think the reason this does not exist, and no one has cared to
put in the effort, is because dist-git is still considered the canonical
source of truth for Fedora builds, and if you
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/39#note_562648033
> We want to use this exact moment as the date in the NVR. But, I
believe we should read that from the commit date for that tag, not from
the shell script checking the system clock after it has
From: David Ward on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/39#note_562616785
Focusing on this part:
> The tag in the kernel-ark tree is placed on the commit used in os-
build to make that release, and the date is the date at which the make
release was tagged.
We want to
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/39#note_562593935
Koji has nothing to do with the date tag in the n-v-r, the date tag is
when 'make release' was run, which may not be the same date that release
is pushed to dist-git with 'make dist-git', and
From: David Ward on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/39#note_562573307
I think I lumped too many different things together, and I'd like to
focus on just one question that is important to me.
If someone checks out a specific tag in kernel-ark (which in turn
16 matches
Mail list logo
