Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/Makefile: Add SPECKABIVERSION variable

2022-06-02 Thread Herton R. Krzesinski (via Email Bridge)
From: Herton R. Krzesinski on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1801#note_969909766 Prarit wrote in the changelog "For DISTRO="fedora" builds, the kabi tarball names only need to be tagged with SPECVERSION", so I think he meant to use SPECVERSION instead of

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/Makefile: Add SPECKABIVERSION variable

2022-06-02 Thread Justin M. Forbes (via Email Bridge)
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1801#note_969753502 This seems correct, looking at a dist-dump-variables. ``` BASEVERSION=5.19.0-0.rc0.d1dc87763f40.10 (perhaps misleadingly named?) SPECVERSION=5.19.0

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/Makefile: Add SPECKABIVERSION variable

2022-06-02 Thread Herton R. Krzesinski (via Email Bridge)
From: Herton R. Krzesinski on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1801#note_969729512 Hi Prarit your commit message is different from what the logic implements, I think for the Fedora case you want SPECVERSION here, instead of BASEVERSION? And the two other cases

[OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/Makefile: Add SPECKABIVERSION variable

2022-06-02 Thread Prarit Bhargava (via Email Bridge)
From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/Makefile: Add SPECKABIVERSION variable Empty kabi tarballs are uploaded to dist-git everytime an .eln build is completed. These empty kabi tarballs waste disk space. In addition to this, new users that recompile the kernel often attempt to update the specversion

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/configs: Set CONFIG_VIRTIO_IOMMU on x86_64

2022-06-02 Thread Eric Auger (via Email Bridge)
From: Eric Auger on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1799#note_969390848 Hi Patrick, sure. Thank you for the info! ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/0] [redhat] New configs in init/Kconfig

2022-06-02 Thread Justin M. Forbes (via Email Bridge)
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1828#note_969355344 @omos It seems like it would, but in practice it does not. I typically sit down and do a large number of fedora configs in a one sitting, one commit. Particularly for obvious ones,

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/0] [redhat] New configs in init/Kconfig

2022-06-02 Thread Patrick Talbert (via Email Bridge)
From: Patrick Talbert on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1833#note_969192152 Alright, disabled for ARK in V2. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[OS-BUILD PATCH 0/0] [redhat] New configs in init/Kconfig

2022-06-02 Thread CKI Gitlab (via Email Bridge)
From: CKI Gitlab on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1833 NOTE: Truncated patchset due to missing public @redhat.com email address on your GitLab profile at https://gitlab.com/-/profile. Once that is fixed, close and reopen the merge

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/0] [redhat] New configs in init/Kconfig

2022-06-02 Thread Patrick Talbert (via Email Bridge)
From: Patrick Talbert on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1828#note_969162752 Just because something is in pending-fedora doesn't mean it is going to end up that way under `fedora/`. It is for @jmflinuxtx and the fedora maintainers to decide how the

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/configs: Set CONFIG_VIRTIO_IOMMU on x86_64

2022-06-02 Thread Patrick Talbert (via Email Bridge)
From: Patrick Talbert on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1799#note_969152321 @eauger1 Thank you for the MR. Just FYI, please do not use Bugzilla: tags in ARK MRs. Nothing in ARK requires a BZ and there is no bugzilla webhook running here that might parse it.