From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/3467#note_2188468884
@jmflinuxtx this is an interesting one here... I think this is actually
readyForMerge, but it's an unanticipated corner case of no file mapping being
found actually being valid, since t
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2917#note_2027764394
Whoops, sorry, didn't look at enough context around the addition.
--
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscri
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2917#note_2026569502
Can you wrap this with an `%if %{with_efiuki}` perhaps, so that people can
skip the requirement if building without the UKI bits of the build?
--
_
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2386#note_1347159845
Some of the var names are a bit long and difficult to read (SPECKVERSION ready
"speck version", but is meant to be "spec kay version", etc), but ... yeah,
this gets a little complicated
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2386#note_1347157765
Interesting that @prarit talked about NOT wanting to use EPOCH, but... this
change already does use 'em. :smile: (For sub-packages that share names
w/packages from non-gemini kernel bui
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2386#note_1347121525
Oh, hrm. It's possible rpm grew some additional intelligence since then, or
I'm having a senior moment. Either way, hysterical raisins. :)
__
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2386#note_1346758298
But also, if the kernel builds aren't 100% in lock-step, you could have a
technically "newer" kernel in the latest release with a lower NVR than the
prior release, because you merged se
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2386#note_1346751724
I believe the problem ages ago in Fedora that necessitated the 100/200/300 was
when we were moving from Fedora 9 to Fedora 10. '.fc9' was rpm-version-compare
newer than '.fc10' -- becau
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2236#note_1252697186
Yeah, this MR was the catalyst for adding that message. This should generally
only trigger for a fresh block attempt by an MR author, and the weird rule
will never be created, things ju
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2095#note_1154732498
LGTM now, thank you for that change.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@l
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1533#note_1146727128
Pardon our noisy bot, it looks like some python-gitlab api changes have caused
an issue for us here, but we're working on fixing it.
___
kern
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2095#note_1138682445
Not a big fan of the "put all files with .yaml suffix under yaml dir" part of
this change. The file type doesn't actually have any bearing on what the file
content relates to. These are
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2068#note_1128502994
Shouldn't this commit/MR also remove the parallel_xz.sh file from the tree?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2068#note_1128501600
@dvlasenk I think we should definitely have your eyes on this, since I believe
this was your addition and it definitely improved build times when it was
added...
___
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2044#note_1127494553
This merge request needs a rebase on latest os-build. It's got merge
conflicts, and gitlab thinks there are 3202 patches and over 3000 files
modified here.
_
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2041#note_1123065015
Hm. For some reason, this is showing up as 3189 patches instead of just one,
so I think it needs to be rebased on the latest os-build or some such thing.
___
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1950#note_1122814217
Okay, fair enough.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2011#note_1122772792
For the record, I remember nothing, that was a LONG time ago, so it probably
paged out of my brain several years back. :smile:
___
kernel mai
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1950#note_1081478493
Would it make sense to use a hardlink here instead of a symlink? My only other
concern would be someone trying to debug a build failure and finding those
intermediate files gone, but I
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1960#note_1052585461
Wait a minute... kernel-tools is built stand-alone in Fedora. I was just
looking at the cs9 kernel spec and not finding it, and that's because it's in
kernel-tools.
https://gitlab.com/
From: Jarod Wilson
spec: add cpupower daemon reload on install/upgrade
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson
diff --git a/redhat/kernel.spec.template b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
index blahblah..blahblah 100755
--- a/redhat/kernel.spec.template
+++ b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
@@ -2700,6 +2700,15 @@ p
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1815#note_989249542
I believe the old thinking was that then-always-pci-less s390x would never
need to build it (but I think some s390x variants have pci now?) and most
embedded arm64 systems had no pci as
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1735#note_939795847
Rebased this on the now-merged !1727 (not 1735, this IS 1735). I think this is
ready to go?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproj
From: Jarod Wilson
redhat: indicate HEAD state in tarball/rpm name
For the non-Fedora (RHEL) case, we are looking to move to a setup where we
include Merge Requests as soon as they are ready, and thus the head of
main may not always be a tagged build. This gives some indication to
someone basing
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1735
NOTE: Truncated patchset since committer email 'pra...@redhat.com'
does not match the submitter's GitLab public email address
'ja...@redhat.com'.
For the non-Fedora (RHEL) cas
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1735#note_928154428
Now rebased on https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1735
and adjusted so that the RHEL_EXTRAVERSION bits are passed along to the spec
properly, based on some irc di
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1735
NOTE: Truncated patchset since committer email 'pra...@redhat.com'
does not match the submitter's GitLab public email address
'ja...@redhat.com'.
For the non-Fedora (RHEL) cas
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1735
NOTE: Truncated patchset since committer email 'pra...@redhat.com'
does not match the submitter's GitLab public email address
'ja...@redhat.com'.
For the non-Fedora (RHEL) cas
From: Jarod Wilson
redhat: disable tv/radio media device infrastructure
Upstream Status: RHEL-only
The analog and digital tv tuners and (FM) radio devices don't see much
play in RHEL server environments. We've never really updated them in any
major release, and have no evidence they're actively
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1735#note_908523131
@prarit I believe you were updating the tests here and on irc said to ignore
this, at least until the update was done. Should I be revisiting this now?
__
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1735#note_908522484
@jmflinuxtx does the above scheme work at least for now? This should only
affect one-off custom builds people do of a RHEL-based build, so far as I
know. :)
_
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1735#note_901860003
Latest version only brings in the RHEL_EXTRAVERSION in the (not (Fedora or
CentOS)) case, and shortens the extra bits to just ".g". (4-char sha hash
of git head).
___
From: Jarod Wilson
redhat: indicate HEAD state in tarball/rpm name
For the non-Fedora (RHEL) case, we are looking to move to a setup where we
include Merge Requests as soon as they are ready, and thus the head of
main may not always be a tagged build. This gives some indication to
someone basing
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1735#note_901540472
Hm. I forgot you're doing both a Fedora and a RHEL-ish pass on things here
every build. This is primarily meant for later use by RHEL, when the only
builds the maintainer does are tagged
From: Jarod Wilson
redhat: indicate HEAD state in tarball/rpm name
For the non-Fedora (RHEL) case, we are looking to move to a setup where we
include Merge Requests as soon as they are ready, and thus the head of
main may not always be a tagged build. This gives some indication to
someone basing
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1530#note_829715823
Yeah, all good now, thanks much.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1570#note_811537415
I'm uncertain why the commitrefs hook was not run on this one already, will
have to investigate logs, but ... not tonight. :)
___
kernel maili
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1570#note_811537264
**Upstream Commit ID Readiness Error(s)!**
This report indicates how backported commits compare to the upstream source
commit. Matching (or not matching) is not a guarantee of correc
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1459#note_750590022
Ouch. Fair enough. We can bear the burden of three extra characters to prevent
a year delay in deployment, I think…
___
kernel mailing list --
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1498#note_749885948
@dzickusrh can you help @kheib out with perms to have an approve button in
ark?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1498#note_749623224
@kheib: Note: we've eliminated support for comment-based approvals, and only
track gitlab's built-in approvals now. If you don't have the approve button
showing up, we can get that remed
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1459#note_746794714
On all of these messages, the "is" doesn't really serve much purpose. I'd just
said "unmaintained hardware detected", and save the 3 characters in every
message.
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1498#note_733805832
Fair point. :)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1498#note_733797260
I've attempted to comment on the overall diff, but I keep getting a "failed to
save comment" message from gitlab, so... Here's one of the two "added" files
from the overall, in snipped g
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1498#note_733793141
Oh, ha, I didn't look at the individual commits, just the overall. Looking at
the overall, those two additions are because they were named incorrectly and
removed by the initial pass, wh
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1498#note_733746242
Which ones are added? I see two files moved/renamed, because the actual config
option name changed, and only the contents of the file were updated, while the
file name wasn't. Those look
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1487#note_731216225
Acked-by: Jarod Wilson
(via approve button)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1442#note_720083675
Acked-by: Jarod Wilson
(via approve button)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1449#note_720055451
Acked-by: Jarod Wilson
(via approve button)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1422#note_700659297
Acked-by: Jarod Wilson
(via approve button)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1333#note_699402656
Acked-by: Jarod Wilson
(via approve button)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1394#note_692854032
Acked-by: Jarod Wilson
(via approve button)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1382#note_691851133
Yeah, what Justin said. Some of this was already done in another MR... was
that for CentOS Stream 9? Do we want to sync the CONFIG_RHEL_DIFFERENCES bit
into there as well?
__
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1330#note_662025156
Acked-by: Jarod Wilson
(via approve button)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1323#note_659358331
Acked-by: Jarod Wilson
(via approve button)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1209#note_643491258
Acked-by: Jarod Wilson
(via approve button)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1209#note_643491091
Okay, fair enough.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1209#note_630063444
Is there a reason this is broken out into two commits instead of just being
one? And should there be something further in the series explaining why the
second patch is toggling this valu
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1262#note_629080900
Acked-by: Jarod Wilson
(via approve button)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1226#note_624076873
Acked-by: Jarod Wilson
(via approve button)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1151#note_587368363
Acked-by: Jarod Wilson
(via approve button)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1126#note_572755224
I'm fine with it, approval was based largely on it already having been
on for a while. There's an admittedly rather narrow use case for this
though (we all have 64-bit binaries by now, w
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1024#note_550918573
Theoretically, the ack spam should stop now, we believe we have a fix
that just went live.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproje
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1023#note_550918407
Theoretically, the ack spam should stop now, we believe we have a fix
that just went live.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproje
From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/721#note_550135609
I think it should actually be Torez doing this review, but I'm not sure
where we're at with gitlab setup for her, and this is simple enough, I
can just approve it, I guess?
__
65 matches
Mail list logo
