Since kernel 5.10 migrated to hirsute (release):
linux-generic | 5.10.0.14.16 | hirsute
this but can now be closed as Fix Released.
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Package
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 5.10.0-14.15
---
linux (5.10.0-14.15) hirsute; urgency=medium
* hirsute/linux: 5.10.0-14.15 -proposed tracker (LP: #1913724)
* Restore palm ejection on multi-input devices (LP: #1913520)
- HID: multitouch: Apply MT_QUIRK_CONFIDENCE qu
Waiting to close as "Fix Released" once the 5.10 kernel has landed in
hirsute. 5.10 kernel is currently in hirsute -proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904906
Title:
Many thx Daniel for squeezing in this additional secureboot lock down test.
Glad that it worked so far. Wish you also an enjoyable break !
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190
Hi Daniel, thx for testing the special kernel build and verifying that it now
boots again on KVM.
Since the initial request from the kernel team was to verify that secureboot
and lockdown works with 5.10 on ppc64el, it would be important to test that,
too - maybe you or Nayna may try secureboot
That's not the sort of config we usually turn on, as it's more of a
developer feature than something end users are interested in. So I don't
see any need to turn the option back on. We can go ahead and grab the
patch though.
In any case I'd like to get some secure boot testing with the current
bui
The 5.10.0-7.8 with CONFIG_RCU_SCALE_TEST disabled has completed and is
available in https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-
team/+archive/ubuntu/bootstrap as before.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https:
Our latest 5.10 update is building with CONFIG_RCU_SCALE_TEST disabled,
I will update once the build is complete.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904906
Title:
5.10 kerne
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904906
Title:
5.10 kernel fails to boot with secure boot disabled
Status i
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904906
Title:
5.10 kernel fails to boot with secure boot disabled
St
That config shouldn't be on at all, it's just a performance test that
isn't likely to be of interest to users. I agree it's weird though -- it
shouldn't cause boot problems, as it shouldn't be loaded automatically
(the module doesn't even have any modaliases). Regardless, I will
disable the option.
I cannot yet explain this, but after bisecting the config, I can repro
this with pseries_le_defconfig + CONFIG_RCU_SCALE_TEST=m
That's weird to me, and I'll continue to investigate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in
Thx for the update, Daniel
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Assignee: Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team) => Ubuntu on IBM
Power Systems Bug Triage (ubuntu-power-triage)
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage (ubuntu-power-triage) =>
Hi Daniel, yes, 5.8 is - as of today - still the current kernel in hirsute
(main and proposed).
But the kernel teams plans to migrate to 5.10 soon, hence the effort (and
pre-requirement for the migration) to test secureboot lock-down upfront. This
is to make sure that potential issues in the sec
I also note that you are testing with 5.10.0-0, which was based on
5.10-rc1. We have 5.10.0-4 in the ppa now based on -rc4, it is built for
hirsute and not groovy though. I'd recommend trying that version to see
if there was an upstream bug which has already been fixed.
--
You received this bug n
I've attached our configs for the Ubuntu 5.8 and 5.10 kernels along with
a diff between these configs. I didn't see anything in the diff which
looked like an obvious candidate for causing the boot problems. Please
let me know if you see something there which should be changed.
--
You received thi
** Patch added: "Diff between Ubuntu 5.8 and 5.10 ppc64el kernel configs"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1904906/+attachment/5436111/+files/ppc64el-config.flavour.generic.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is sub
** Attachment added: "Ubuntu ppc64el kernel config for 5.10"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1904906/+attachment/5436110/+files/ppc64el-config.flavour.generic-5.10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to li
** Attachment added: "Ubuntu ppc64el kernel config for 5.8"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1904906/+attachment/5436109/+files/ppc64el-config.flavour.generic-5.8
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linu
** Also affects: ubuntu-power-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribe
21 matches
Mail list logo