On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 12:46 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 11:26 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sat
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 11:26 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
>> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 15:39 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
>> > []
>> >> I
On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 11:26 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 15:39 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> > []
> >> I also think it is useful to realize that UNIX was basically designed
> >> for systems
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 15:39 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> []
>> I also think it is useful to realize that UNIX was basically designed
>> for systems that have a MMU even though low-end systems in the late
>> 70s / e
On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 15:39 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
[]
> I also think it is useful to realize that UNIX was basically designed
> for systems that have a MMU even though low-end systems in the late
> 70s / early 80s did not have them.
The first ones (also before) didn't have a MMU and the f
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 2:58 PM, William Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you Manish;
>
> I think I am starting to approach an answer I hadn't thought of. Let me
> try it out below. Please correct me if I am wrong.
>
>
> On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 23:40 +0530, Manish Katiyar wrote:
> [snip]
>
>
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 12:28 AM, William Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you Manish;
>
> I think I am starting to approach an answer I hadn't thought of. Let me
> try it out below. Please correct me if I am wrong.
>
>
> On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 23:40 +0530, Manish Katiyar wrote:
> [snip]
>
Thank you Manish;
I think I am starting to approach an answer I hadn't thought of. Let me
try it out below. Please correct me if I am wrong.
On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 23:40 +0530, Manish Katiyar wrote:
[snip]
> I don't know about other OS's, but swapper is *handcrafted* using the
> macro INIT_TAS
