On Thursday 31 August 2006 02:10, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 12:35:21PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
> > > Simple question -- and to be quite honest with you -- I don't
> > > understand why you wouldn't want to simply use gdb alone
> > > in this case?
> >
> > I don't see any reason
On Thursday 31 August 2006 09:51, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:24:13PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 21:12 -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps the bitkeeper 2.6.*-kgdb-stable repositories:
> >
> > http://linux.bkbits.net/
> >
> > would be a e
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 23:42, Piet Delaney wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 10:58 -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 06:47 -0700, Furqan Ahmed Ghulam Shabbir wrote:
>
> You might find the attached kgdb code helpful. It's from my
> 2.6.12 kgdb workspace. I haven't pulled it up t
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:24:13PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 21:12 -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
>
> Perhaps the bitkeeper 2.6.*-kgdb-stable repositories:
>
> http://linux.bkbits.net/
>
> would be a easy way to maintain kgdb support for a series
> of releases.
On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 21:12 -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
Perhaps the bitkeeper 2.6.*-kgdb-stable repositories:
http://linux.bkbits.net/
would be a easy way to maintain kgdb support for a series
of releases.
Free Bitkeeper use for bitkeeper 2.6.*-kgdb-stable repositories
might help
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:42:32 -0700
Piet Delaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 15:57 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:48:22 -0700
> > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Plus: I'd want to see a maintainance person or team who
> > > respond
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 15:57 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:48:22 -0700
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Plus: I'd want to see a maintainance person or team who
> > respond promptly to email and who remain reasonably engaged with what's
> > going on in the mai
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:48:22 -0700
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Plus: I'd want to see a maintainance person or team who
> respond promptly to email and who remain reasonably engaged with what's
> going on in the mainline kernel. Because if problems crop up (and they
> will), I don'
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 14:53 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:41:32 -0700 Piet Delaney wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 16:40 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 12:35:21PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Simple question -- and to be quite ho
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:41:32 -0700 Piet Delaney wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 16:40 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 12:35:21PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Simple question -- and to be quite honest with you -- I don't
> > > > understand why you wouldn't want t
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:41:32 -0700
Piet Delaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My preference is for kgdb, like kexec, to become part of the
> mainstream kernel as a configurable component.
Me too. And I expect I could talk Linus into it if a) it works well on a
transport other-than-rs232 and b) t
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 16:40 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 12:35:21PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
> > >
> > > Simple question -- and to be quite honest with you -- I don't
> > > understand why you wouldn't want to simply use gdb alone
> > > in this case?
> >
> > I don't see an
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 12:35:21PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
> >
> > Simple question -- and to be quite honest with you -- I don't
> > understand why you wouldn't want to simply use gdb alone
> > in this case?
>
> I don't see any reason for core file not to be read correctly by
> gdb. It's conve
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 09:15 -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
Morning Dave:
> Rachita Kothiyal wrote:
>
> > Hi Dave
> >
> > I was trying to implement better backtrace mechanism for crash using
> > dwarf info. And was trying to use the embedded gdb itself as gdb
> > already uses dwarf information for u
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 06:47 -0700, Furqan Ahmed Ghulam Shabbir wrote:
> Hi,
> I have tried to work with kgdb using serial but wasn't able
> to do that due to errors now I am trying to setup kgdb with
> ethernet. I successfully applied the all patches
>
> and configured with ethernet suppor
Checked this in,
files changed,
- core.patch
- Changelog.
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 16:42 +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> Vitaly,
>
> That's a good find. This is certainly the correct way to prevent soft lockup.
>
> Will checkin.
> Thanks.
> -Amit
>
> On Tuesday
Hi, I have tried to work with kgdb using serial but wasn't able to do that due to errors now I am trying to setup kgdb with ethernet. I successfully applied the all patches and configured with ethernet support for kgdb with make menuconfig. then i gave make bzImage command and placed both Syst
Find the patch attached for memory checks (comparison of
requested address against TASK_SIZE) to kgdb_mem2hex, kgdb_ebin2mem,
kgdb_hex2mem. This prohibits KGDB from accessing user level memory.
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 18:22 +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> On Thursday 17 August 2006 04:19, Piet Delaney
18 matches
Mail list logo
