On Thursday 31 August 2006 09:51, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:24:13PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 21:12 -0700, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > > Perhaps the bitkeeper 2.6.*-kgdb-stable repositories: > > > > http://linux.bkbits.net/ > > > > would be a easy way to maintain kgdb support for a series > > of releases. > > I'm sorry, but I don't have any interest in setting up a BitKeeper tree > for KGDB. At this point in time I'm looking for a little bit of time, > and a chance to setup a stacked git repository for KGDB as this should > allow us to keep everything as individual patches still, yet easily sync > with mainline, which is our biggest headache at the moment.
This would be good. Syncing with mainline has indeed been a recurring work item. -Amit > > Nothing against BitKeeper or anything as I spent much time using it, > wearing my PPC guy hat. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Kgdb-bugreport mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
