Hi all,
While working in 3D-Viewer, I found something that I am not sure if is an issue
or feature.
It seems that the Non plated TH PAD types are extracted the way you can see in
the attached picture. I was expecting no copper at all, but some "precision
residues" are left ..
Anyone that unde
Le 21/03/2015 14:47, Marco Ciampa a écrit :
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 02:38:36PM +0100, jp charras wrote:
>> Le 21/03/2015 14:05, Marco Ciampa a écrit :
>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:12:36PM +0100, jp charras wrote:
Le 20/03/2015 19:15, Chris Pavlina a écrit :
> When the Hotkeys List was
Le 22/03/2015 03:18, Chris Pavlina a écrit :
> Here is a fixed version of the patch. It handled perfectly any complex
> hierarchies I could throw at it. Got anything worse to torture it with?
>
> Chris
Better, but not yet perfect...
There is an issue for units of a package which are on different
Hello all,
Does anyone have a test project (for pcbnew) that I can use to test and see
several complex aspects in a board?
Things like multi layers, complex edge cuts, different holes shapes and sizes,
complex filling zones.. etc etc?
Thanks.
Mario Luzeiro
___
Hi Cirilo,
while working in VRML model parser to import KiCad generated VRML files, I
notice the issue attached.
The zone filling is strange and parts are missing. Any idea why?!
Regards,
Mario Luzeiro___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-deve
Hi Cirilo,
I forgot to mention that the screenshot is from FreeCad, so, same issue on
FreeCAD.
The board in pcbnew and normal view3d is OK, in fact, I already produced it,
assembly and tested in real life :)
I found another issue, if you dont set the "Footprint 3D model path", so, if it
is nul
From: Michele
There are two Hotkey submenu under "Preferences" in Kicad.
This patch removes the second one.
---
kicad/menubar.cpp | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kicad/menubar.cpp b/kicad/menubar.cpp
index d34379b..3c6a6f4 100644
--- a/kicad/menubar.cpp
+++ b/kicad/menubar
Got it - fixed. Looks like I was a bit overzealous in correcting the
first patch and introduced this.
I also found another issue - it didn't treat unannotated parts
differently, so if you had a schematic full of R?A it would try to make
them all R1A. Also fixed.
I can't think of anything els
Currently, if you try to edit the value of a power component in
eeschema, you get a "... is a power component and it's [sic] value
cannot be modified!" message. That message isn't completely accurate,
though. The edit box also allows you to change the *formatting*, which
is perfectly valid to
9 matches
Mail list logo
