Re: [Kicad-developers] 3D-Viewer - Request for merge evaluation

The extra-large board in the footprint preview is due to invisible text (in this case Component Value). I am more interested in segfaults; can you tell if the segfaults are caused by specific models - that is, attempting to view a specific model causes a segfault? I'm asking because that would ind

Re: [Kicad-developers] 3D-Viewer - Request for merge evaluation

Mário, In order to build on OSX, I had to make the following change: pcbnew/exporters/export_vrml.cpp, line 1210 -wxFileName modelFileName = wxString::FromUTF8Unchecked( -resolver->ResolvePath( sM->m_Filename ) ); +wxFileName modelFileName = resolver->ResolvePath( sM->

[Kicad-developers] Possible 4.0.3 prerelease test for OS X

Hi folks, As you know, there have been some struggles testing what will become 4.0.3 for OS X. :) I think we got through them all! If someone so inclined could download "4.0.3 rc7" from http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/osx/stable/, and do a little testing, that would be awesome. I don't need a su

Re: [Kicad-developers] 3D-Viewer - Request for merge evaluation

Hi Chris, >From long time I was merging updates from Cirilo's branch related with changes >on 3D plugins. That difference comes from one of that updates: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mrluzeiro/kicad/kicad_new3d-viewer/revision/5608.35.101#pcbnew/exporters/export_vrml.cpp Maybe Cirilo can clarify

Re: [Kicad-developers] wxFileSystemWatcher bug.

Thanks Simon. I'll commit the patch as soon as I get a chance to test it on Linux. On 6/14/2016 5:12 PM, Simon Wells wrote: > Also tested the patch here, and works fine > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> Apparently so. I just add a dummy text file to the remote proj

Re: [Kicad-developers] Possible 4.0.3 prerelease test for OS X

Hi Adam, i tested rc7 on osx 10.11.5, installation from dmg was ok, tried to open schema, pcb, change canvas, open boards etc. Not very deep testing but so far working ok besides behavior i reported earlier #1592767 https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1592767

Re: [Kicad-developers] Possible 4.0.3 prerelease test for OS X

DMG seems to work fine. Installed clean and at first glance everything seems to load fine. On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Adam Wolf wrote: > Hi folks, > > As you know, there have been some struggles testing what will become 4.0.3 > for OS X. :) I think we got through them all! > > If someone

Re: [Kicad-developers] Possible 4.0.3 prerelease test for OS X

Everything looks good here too. :) On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 07:49:28AM -0500, Adam Wolf wrote: > Hi folks, > > As you know, there have been some struggles testing what will become 4.0.3 > for OS X. :) I think we got through them all! > > If someone so inclined could download "4.0.3 rc7" from > h

Re: [Kicad-developers] Possible 4.0.3 prerelease test for OS X

Hi Adam I downloaded and installed both the kicad and kicad-extras. I opened kicad and it found the files I had been working on last. In the schematic view, I see that the two finger motion is linked to the zoom. If I hold the shift key down, the two finger drag works to move the schematic ar

Re: [Kicad-developers] RFC: position file changes

It will be good if it will be selectable as option В Среда, 15 июн. 2016 в 12:40 , Cirilo Bernardo написал: Hi Eldar, The problem I have is that different standards have different orientations. Even IPC now have "Orientation Level A", which is what is described in 7351B, and another one wh

Re: [Kicad-developers] How to SCH_SCREEN::SchematicCleanup?

Hi, On 15.06.2016 08:53, jp charras wrote: > I do not understand why net ties are related to schematic cleanup. > They are 2 separate features. For the "net ties as special junctions" implementation, the cleanup code needs to be adjusted -- that's where they come together. > Although no decisio

Re: [Kicad-developers] Possible 4.0.3 prerelease test for OS X

Hi Bob, In trunk/nightlies there is an option to have 2 finger pan instead of zoom with pinch-to-zoom. Which makes the behaviour much better on osx touchpads, While the speed of the zoom is annoying in stable i don't think it will be backported into stable Simon On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:25 AM,

Re: [Kicad-developers] Possible 4.0.3 prerelease test for OS X

Hi Bob, Thanks for the extensive feedback. It sounds to me like the package was able to be opened and seemed normal, so I'm calling that a success! Combined with the other feedback, I'm going to say, Wayne, we can make a 4.0.3 for OS X. Let me know when it's all ready, and I can generate a new

Re: [Kicad-developers] Possible 4.0.3 prerelease test for OS X

On 6/15/2016 3:05 PM, Adam Wolf wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Thanks for the extensive feedback. It sounds to me like the package was > able to be opened and seemed normal, so I'm calling that a success! > > Combined with the other feedback, I'm going to say, Wayne, we can make a > 4.0.3 for OS X. Let

Re: [Kicad-developers] Possible 4.0.3 prerelease test for OS X

Before the next stable release, we need to figure out why stable doesn't build on CMake 3.5.something but builds fine on 3.1.something, and backport the work. I want to make some progress on Simon's signing stuff before starting that. Adam Wolf On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Wayne Stambaugh w

Re: [Kicad-developers] 3D-Viewer - Request for merge evaluation

Hi Cirilo, Chris, As I received so many requests from you ;) I implemented the features similar as you describe below. Please update, rebuild and retry with the latest updates from my branch. I found an easy and elegant way of implement it, with just some minimal changes. It only add a small over

Re: [Kicad-developers] 3D-Viewer - Request for merge evaluation

VERY nice, I wasn't expecting that so fast! :D Attached is what I think is the "final" patch to make it build right on other systems. Still haven't heard back from anyone on the wxString/UTF8 thing, but I *think* this is right, we can always change it later if not. On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 08:40:2

Re: [Kicad-developers] 3D-Viewer - Request for merge evaluation

This patch seem to fix the build issues I was having with 3d-viewer/3d_rendering/3d_render_raytracing/accelerators/cbvh_pbrt.cpp too. 2016-06-15 23:11 GMT+02:00 Chris Pavlina : > VERY nice, I wasn't expecting that so fast! :D > > Attached is what I think is the "final" patch to make it build right

Re: [Kicad-developers] 3D-Viewer - Request for merge evaluation

Thanks Chris, I managed to apply (somehow) your patch. Mario From: Chris Pavlina [pavlina.ch...@gmail.com] Sent: 15 June 2016 22:11 To: Mário Luzeiro Cc: Cirilo Bernardo; kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] 3D-Viewer - Reque

Re: [Kicad-developers] Possible 4.0.3 prerelease test for OS X

OK, I will give the nightly a try - probably tomorrow when there is a new nightly. Thanks much for the hint. Bob G On 06/15/2016 01:03 PM, Simon Wells wrote: Hi Bob, In trunk/nightlies there is an option to have 2 finger pan instead of zoom with pinch-to-zoom. Which makes the behaviour much

Re: [Kicad-developers] 3D-Viewer - Request for merge evaluation

Oh, sorry, I shouldn't have given you a git patch, wasn't thinking. :D On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 09:49:59PM +, Mário Luzeiro wrote: > Thanks Chris, > I managed to apply (somehow) your patch. > > Mario > > From: Chris Pavlina [pavlina.ch...@gmail.com] > S

Re: [Kicad-developers] 3D-Viewer - Request for merge evaluation

Sorry, I must have made that mistake when I changed the code to use the resolver. I must have just been substituting the resolver in places without checking how the file name was actually being processed. - Cirilo On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mário Luzeiro wrote: > Hi Chris, > > From long

Re: [Kicad-developers] wxFileSystemWatcher bug.

Tested on Linux with NFS and SSHFS mounts, no issue here either. On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 09:18:21AM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > Thanks Simon. I'll commit the patch as soon as I get a chance to test > it on Linux. > > On 6/14/2016 5:12 PM, Simon Wells wrote: > > Also tested the patch here, an

[Kicad-developers] What's still missing in GAL?

Other than a decently efficient fallback backend for systems that can't handle OpenGL+GAL, do we have an official list of things we need to be implemented in GAL before legacy can be taken out? I really want to keep working on the UI cleanup, but having dual canvases is quite the roadblock to doing

[Kicad-developers] Interesting consequence of "subtract soldermask from silkscreen"

A warning to anyone making PCBs - and maybe to get some devs thinking, I'm not sure if there's a better way to do this: For those who didn't know, "subtract soldermask from silkscreen", for Gerber, is implemented by plotting the silkscreen, then switching plot modes to 'clear' with the %LPC*% comm

Re: [Kicad-developers] RFC: position file changes

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 07:12:50PM +0300, Eldar Khayrullin wrote: > It will be good if it will be selectable as option Not an option, make it explicitly *select* the pin 1 for orientation, it will save troubles! Adding it to the footprint properties would be the easiest IMHO -- Lorenzo Marcanto