Re: [Kicad-developers] Kicad support for Linux on PPC

2019-08-29 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 8/29/19 10:21 AM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > On a side note: ppc64le was also enabled recently on fedora for the copr > builds and possibly also their official packages of kicad. It is in updates/testing, and should become available in official updates soon. For example:

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.5 RC?

2019-08-29 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
If ngspice-30 is completely broken on macos, we may have no choice but to fall back to ngspice-26. The brings the bugs that have been fixed since ngspice-26 back into play which is less than ideal but I don't see a solution unless there is a new release of ngspice that resolves the issues. We

Re: [Kicad-developers] Minimum Boost version

2019-08-29 Thread Carsten Schoenert
Hi, Am 29.08.19 um 14:09 schrieb Wayne Stambaugh: > What's wrong with setting the minimum boost version to 1.59? If this is > the version that has the testing features that you need and presumably > all later versions, then this should suffice. I would prefer that we > maximize the number of

Re: [Kicad-developers] Kicad support for Linux on PPC

2019-08-29 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 04:27:56PM +0200, Gianluca Renzi wrote: > Cool! But my platform is ppc64be! :-( What hardware is that? I want one. Simon ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to :

Re: [Kicad-developers] Kicad support for Linux on PPC

2019-08-29 Thread Gianluca Renzi
Cool! But my platform is ppc64be! :-( On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:21 PM Nick Østergaard wrote: > On a side note: ppc64le was also enabled recently on fedora for the copr > builds and possibly also their official packages of kicad. > > tor. 29. aug. 2019 14.22 skrev Gianluca Renzi : > >> Ok,

Re: [Kicad-developers] Kicad support for Linux on PPC

2019-08-29 Thread Nick Østergaard
On a side note: ppc64le was also enabled recently on fedora for the copr builds and possibly also their official packages of kicad. tor. 29. aug. 2019 14.22 skrev Gianluca Renzi : > Ok, thanks! > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:40 PM Jean-Samuel Reynaud > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Best way it step 0

Re: [Kicad-developers] macOS notarizing

2019-08-29 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
Thanks folks for stepping up to help Adam! On 8/29/19 7:58 AM, Adam Wolf wrote: > Sounds good, Bernhard.  Some other folks contacted me off list.  I have > a few plans on getting this to work and I'm doing some quick experiments > to test them out.  I am actually out of town over this next

Re: [Kicad-developers] Kicad support for Linux on PPC

2019-08-29 Thread Gianluca Renzi
Ok, thanks! On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:40 PM Jean-Samuel Reynaud wrote: > Hi, > > Best way it step 0 (backup) then step 2 (adding ppa and install kicad > 5.1 over v4). Normaly there is no complicts. By using "apt full-upgrade" > once ppa is added, kicad should be upgraded. > > Tell me. > > For

Re: [Kicad-developers] Minimum Boost version

2019-08-29 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
What's wrong with setting the minimum boost version to 1.59? If this is the version that has the testing features that you need and presumably all later versions, then this should suffice. I would prefer that we maximize the number of supported distros whenever possible. Cheers, Wayne On

Re: [Kicad-developers] macOS notarizing

2019-08-29 Thread Adam Wolf
Sounds good, Bernhard. Some other folks contacted me off list. I have a few plans on getting this to work and I'm doing some quick experiments to test them out. I am actually out of town over this next weekend for a US holiday, but later next week I'll collect my thoughts and email all the

Re: [Kicad-developers] Kicad support for Linux on PPC

2019-08-29 Thread Jean-Samuel Reynaud
Hi, Best way it step 0 (backup) then step 2 (adding ppa and install kicad 5.1 over v4). Normaly there is no complicts. By using "apt full-upgrade" once ppa is added, kicad should be upgraded. Tell me. For next reply, no need to put developers list in copy ;) I'll help you directly.. Thanks, Le

Re: [Kicad-developers] Kicad support for Linux on PPC

2019-08-29 Thread Gianluca Renzi
Ok, thanks! I will give it a try on my PPC64 machine! I have a question: at the moment I have on PPC64 ubuntu 16.04 and Kicad 4 installed from ubuntu packages. In the same machine I have compiled from sources (as the patches of mine) Kicad 5 and installed in a different path /opt/kicad-5 . Which

Re: [Kicad-developers] Kicad support for Linux on PPC

2019-08-29 Thread Jean-Samuel Reynaud
On Ubuntu 19.04, this is version 5.0.2 by default (but not available for PPC). Instead of recompiling, you can also use ppa (ppa:js-reynaud/kicad-5.1) but only for PPC64. Regards, Le 29/08/2019 à 09:49, Gianluca Renzi a écrit : > Ok, I will do that. > This evening I will have a look on what is

Re: [Kicad-developers] Kicad support for Linux on PPC

2019-08-29 Thread Gianluca Renzi
Ok, I will do that. This evening I will have a look on what is installed by default on Ubuntu 19.04. Otherwise I will compile V5.1 from scratch. Regards, On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:43 AM Jean-Samuel Reynaud wrote: > Dear Gianluca, > > KiCad V4 is really old. For me it's not a good idea to

Re: [Kicad-developers] Kicad support for Linux on PPC

2019-08-29 Thread Jean-Samuel Reynaud
Dear Gianluca, KiCad V4 is really old. For me it's not a good idea to provide packages on new distributions (not even sure that it will compile without patches...). Normaly, you can convert your work (keep a backup somewhere..) to V5 or better V5.1. As far as I remember, KiCad V5.1 is able to

Re: [Kicad-developers] macOS notarizing

2019-08-29 Thread Bernhard Stegmaier
Hi Adam, I have some of the most important stuff of my (non-KiCad) Todo list done in the next couple of days. I will have to update my build environment, find my developer ID, but then I wanted to try how this could work… I’ll drop you a note when I am ready… Regards, Bernhard > On 29. Aug

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.5 RC?

2019-08-29 Thread Jonatan Liljedahl
Hi, On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:27 AM Adam Wolf wrote: > > Jonathan, I hear you. I rolled back to ngspice-26 for the 5.1.4 > release, and I think it probably makes sense to roll back to > ngspice-26 for 5.1.5 as well. Are you saying you meant to roll back in the official 5.1.4 release, or that