Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.0 nightlies?

2019-04-22 Thread Nick Østergaard
Previously I have been running with /testing/ for windows, and /nightlies for master. On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 23:05, Adam Wolf wrote: > I set them up. They'll upload to testing/5.1 for now. > > Do we want to move the regular nightlies to nightlies/master and put > these in nightlies/5.1? > >

Re: [Kicad-developers] upload issues to cern s3cmd?

2019-04-22 Thread Nick Østergaard
But it seems like you can also use the aws-cli as follows: aws s3 cp your.dmg s3://kicad-downloads/osx/nightly/ --endpoint-url https://s3.cern.ch After you configured the access and secrect key with aws configure. On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 15:30, Nick Østergaard wrote: > I guess s3cmd d

Re: [Kicad-developers] upload issues to cern s3cmd?

2019-04-22 Thread Nick Østergaard
I guess s3cmd does not work with python3. Then I took at look at https://s3tools.org/s3cmd and it says that version 2 do work with python3 and it looks like are using verison 2... Does it work if you put just one file? On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 15:19, Adam Wolf wrote: > Hi folks! > > Apologies

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.1 issue

2019-04-21 Thread Nick Østergaard
Yes, just retag the 5.1.1 tags as 5.1.2 as well. We have done that before and is probably what will have the least workload. :) On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 23:44, Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 4/21/19 5:18 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > It's looks like 5.1.1 has a serious issue which was fixed and

Re: [Kicad-developers] Best practice for multi-gate symbols ? (74LVC2G14 has hidden pins)

2019-04-21 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hello Henner, I think the Librarians more or less communicate exclusively via github issues. So it may be worth to post this as an issue on the kicad-symbols repo over on github. Regards Nick On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 22:12, Henner Zeller wrote: > Hi, > While converting some older project to

Re: [Kicad-developers] kicad_pcb, kicad_mod format change for daily build?

2019-04-21 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hi I am just curious about this topic. Is this a case where we should have bumped the SEXPR_BOARD_FILE_VERSION? Or is this not needed as an earlier kicad version would read it just fine? Nick On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 18:46, Jeff Young wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > KiCad will read them in either way

Re: [Kicad-developers] Release 5.1.1_1 Windows build

2019-04-18 Thread Nick Østergaard
Both installers work when I download from s3.cern The mirror you have must be broken. On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 13:49, tedd.t...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > I've downloaded the latest stable x64 build from > kicad-downloads.s3.cern.ch, but it failed the NSIS installer > verification. > > To be

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.1 release reminder.

2019-04-17 Thread Nick Østergaard
; > > > I have the release announcement ready to go but it's on my desktop > > computer at home. If most of the packages are ready, I will push the > > release announcement this evening after I get home from work. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Wayne &

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.1 release reminder.

2019-04-17 Thread Nick Østergaard
The windows installers are uploading to the stable folder A quick sanity check says they work. Although that in the 32 bit version the python console does not open from the toolbar, but I think that has been an issue for a while. Works ok for 64 bit. And of couse we see the cannot write

Re: [Kicad-developers] Merge schedule

2019-04-08 Thread Nick Østergaard
Ok, cool. I guess we all agree to merge it on master :) man. 8. apr. 2019 16.45 skrev Tomasz Wlostowski : > On 08/04/2019 13:58, Nick Østergaard wrote: > > Hi Tomasz > > > > I was wondering about this yesterday. Has it even been merged on master? > > > > I

Re: [Kicad-developers] Windows build error.

2019-04-08 Thread Nick Østergaard
Fails on linux as well man. 8. apr. 2019 17.12 skrev Wayne Stambaugh : > According to `git bisect`, commit > 77f15eeeaf89a5d2179ee800f6faa11faf718d0e broke windows builds (32 and 64 > bits) with the following error: > > C:/msys64/home/wstambaugh/src/kicad-trunk/kicad/import_project.cpp:144:46: >

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.1

2019-04-08 Thread Nick Østergaard
I am noy sure what this means. Does it depend on changes in kicad or the installer only? man. 8. apr. 2019 14.46 skrev Simon Richter : > Hi, > > On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 11:31:27PM -0400, Seth Hillbrand wrote: > > > I'd like to suggest spinning out 5.1.1 soon and pushing the existing > > 5.1.1

Re: [Kicad-developers] Merge schedule

2019-04-08 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hi Tomasz I was wondering about this yesterday. Has it even been merged on master? I think I would prefer not to merge it on stable if it has not even been tested on master, but if you think it is low risk I guess it is ok. As I have not tested it I don't know what it looks like, but if you

Re: [Kicad-developers] Git down?

2019-04-03 Thread Nick Østergaard
See https://twitter.com/launchpadstatus/status/1113042990228963328 On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 21:28, Jon Evans wrote: > Same for me > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 3:27 PM Jeff Young wrote: > >> Is launchpad’s git instance down? It’s refusing my connection... >>

Re: [Kicad-developers] timestamp_t bit width

2019-03-24 Thread Nick Østergaard
A but report about this was also reported for tracking at https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821476 søn. 24. mar. 2019 19.34 skrev Seth Hillbrand : > Am 2019-03-24 13:23, schrieb Jon Evans: > > Hi all, > > > > Another question from this forum thread: > > >

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] get initial Python 3 support

2019-03-23 Thread Nick Østergaard
staller with > python3 support and WXPYTHON disabled. But if you are tight on time, I can > totally understand. > > Best regards, Mitja > > > -- > *From:* Nick Østergaard > *To:* thomas.pointhu...@gmx.at > *Cc:* KiCad Developers >

Re: [Kicad-developers] KiCAD snap package

2019-03-21 Thread Nick Østergaard
g all details (like the split out 3d > >> packages) if necessary. > >> We could/should also host the packaging under the KiCad github project > >> if you decide to publish an official package. > >> > >> Best wishes > >> Max > >> >

Re: [Kicad-developers] KiCAD snap package

2019-03-21 Thread Nick Østergaard
ke the split out 3d > packages) if necessary. > We could/should also host the packaging under the KiCad github project > if you decide to publish an official package. > > Best wishes > Max > > Am Fr., 15. März 2019 um 13:34 Uhr schrieb Nick Østergaard < > oe.n...@

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.0 package builds

2019-03-15 Thread Nick Østergaard
: > >> Thank you everyone for all of your hard work in getting 5.1 released. >> It never ceases to amaze me the tireless efforts that everyone puts in >> to make this happen. Here is to more great releases in the future. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Wayne >&g

Re: [Kicad-developers] KiCAD snap package

2019-03-15 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hello It seems that I have it under my canonical account. I am not sure if access can somehhow be shared. If you add some instructions on the readme in your repo I will take a look at it. Nick On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 13:30, Maximilian Federle wrote: > Hello, > > I've packaged KiCAD 5.1 as a

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.0 package builds

2019-03-14 Thread Nick Østergaard
Release annoncement live now. On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 18:15, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > Nick, > > I just pushed the last few changes to the release announcement so once > the website download links are updated everything should be ready to go. > > Thanks, > > Wayne > &g

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.0 package builds

2019-03-14 Thread Nick Østergaard
Thank you Steven! tor. 14. mar. 2019 16.27 skrev Steven A. Falco : > On 3/14/19 10:26 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > How are we doing on the 5.1.0 packaging? I've only heard from > > Jean-Samuel thus far. Are the windows and macos packages ready to go > > yet? I have a few minor tweaks to

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.0 package builds

2019-03-14 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hi Essentially ready, meaning windows, PPA and macos builds are done/sanity checked, but not moved to stable folder yet. Please push your tweaks for the draft of the announcement ASAP. I intend to fixup the other things in a couple of hours. Nick On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 15:28, Wayne Stambaugh

Re: [Kicad-developers] Download speeds for nightly builds seem a bit slow to a lot of people over at the forum

2019-03-12 Thread Nick Østergaard
//github.com/KiCad/kicad-winbuilder/blob/master/nsis/install.nsi#L647 > > > Regards > Russell Oliver > > On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 at 21:30, Nick Østergaard wrote: > > > > > https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-winbuilder/issues/53#issuecomment-337167911 > > > > t

Re: [Kicad-developers] Download speeds for nightly builds seem a bit slow to a lot of people over at the forum

2019-03-12 Thread Nick Østergaard
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-winbuilder/issues/53#issuecomment-337167911 tir. 12. mar. 2019 11.07 skrev Russell Oliver : > To cut down the download size, can there be a nightly package built > that doesn't contain the library, module and 3d files? just enough to > overwrite the program files.

Re: [Kicad-developers] Bus upgrades merge (was: V6 merge priority)

2019-03-11 Thread Nick Østergaard
If you do decide to merge but disable by default, please consider to use the kicad_advanced config. man. 11. mar. 2019 15.06 skrev Jon Evans : > Hi Wayne, > > I will rebase and post an updated branch soon. > I will also generally be available to fix any bugs although will be > offline for a few

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1 release

2019-03-10 Thread Nick Østergaard
Thank you. søn. 10. mar. 2019 20.34 skrev Wayne Stambaugh : > Nick, > > I'll push the initial draft later this evening. I figure it will be > Tuesday or Wednesday until most of the packages are built and uploaded > to the website. > > Wayne > > On 3/10/19 3:2

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1 release

2019-03-10 Thread Nick Østergaard
Please push the announcement to the website repo in case we want to add some more info. søn. 10. mar. 2019 20.23 skrev Wayne Stambaugh : > Thank your Rene and all of the library developers for your efforts. > This should be the last of the repo tags so lets fire up those package > builders. I

Re: [Kicad-developers] Documentation

2019-03-09 Thread Nick Østergaard
That particular commit didn't, but latest is good. lør. 9. mar. 2019 07.27 skrev Simon Richter : > Hi, > > the documentation failed to compile for me last night: > > https://jenkins.simonrichter.eu/job/any-kicad-doc-head/569/ > > Is that just me, or is something broken? > >Simon > >

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1 release

2019-03-08 Thread Nick Østergaard
Forwarding to kicad-doc-devs in case anyone missed it, and adding tag intent on kicad-i18n and kicad-doc as: https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-i18n/issues/363 https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-doc/issues/691 On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 20:16, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > The 5.1.0 release has been tagged and

Re: [Kicad-developers] Translation Status

2019-03-07 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hello Michal I don't see any recent pull request from you. Please don't hold back, if you got a good chunk done, just submit it. On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 20:43, Michal Jahelka wrote: > Hi, > > I just finished Czech (cs) translation. Mostly translated, except some > Gerber part (i am not too

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.0-rc2 tag

2019-03-01 Thread Nick Østergaard
You should be able to trigger a tagged build now for rc2 fre. 1. mar. 2019 03.29 skrev Adam Wolf : > Any chance Nick or someone could make that docs tarball for this, so we > can test 5.1.0 rc2 on Mac? (Probably built on 10.12!) > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, 1:30 PM Wayne Stambaugh > wrote: > >>

Re: [Kicad-developers] OT: Re: Kicad support for Linux on PPC

2019-02-26 Thread Nick Østergaard
Dunno, but I see kicad on this https://static.rptorcs.com/TALOSII/images/talos_ii_eda_teaser_prerelease_small.png >From https://www.raptorcs.com/TALOSII/prerelease.php :) On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 21:31, Vesa Solonen wrote: > Clemens Koller kirjoitti 18.2.2019 klo 12.48: > > Sorry, for getting

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.0-rc2

2019-02-18 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hello, I know it may be slightly late, but I created a 5.1.0-rc2 milestone. There was an issue with some rendering in sketch mode for arcs. I know that rc2 is very imminent. On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 08:14, Константин Барановский < baranovskiykonstan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you, Carsten. Now

Re: [Kicad-developers] 3D viewer only using lower-left quadrant?

2019-02-17 Thread Nick Østergaard
I think we also saw this a long time ago with hidpibdisplays. Maybe the recent changes have undone something... søn. 17. feb. 2019 23.17 skrev Tomasz Wlostowski : > On 17/02/2019 23:04, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > Looks fine on Linux. > > > > On 2/17/19 4:50 PM, Jeff Young wrote: > >> The 3D

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.0-rc1

2019-02-13 Thread Nick Østergaard
Should we create a 5.1.0-rc2 milestone or should we just use 5.1.0 if we think something needs to be included? On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 19:52, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > I'm going to tag 5.1.0-rc1 this evening after I get home from work. > There are still two low priority bugs against the 5.1.0-rc1

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.0-rc1

2019-02-11 Thread Nick Østergaard
I think all the scripts we have do work with python3 unless we missed something. I think Thomas P. did test it. On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 17:11, Jean-Samuel Reynaud wrote: > Dear All, > > PPA for KiCad 5.1 is now ready. > When it's possible (for example on Ubuntu Bionic) GTK 3 is used, python3 >

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Advanced config docs

2019-02-10 Thread Nick Østergaard
The addition looks sane to me. On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 22:56, John Beard wrote: > Hi, > > Here's a patch for the advanced config dev-docs. Basically, it says > "here be dragons, use at your peril". I realise after re-reading the > docs I wrote before, that this is not clear. > > Sending to the

[Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Add anchor for advanced configuration for doxygen docs

2019-02-10 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hello I would like to see the attached minor documentation change to be merged as it makes it easier to link to the section from the www. The patch should otherwise be self explanatory :) Regards Nick Østergaard From d95b0ff71ea3335e6c769b46479ec10ed7617c1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF

Re: [Kicad-developers] Download mirrors.

2019-02-06 Thread Nick Østergaard
see fit. Regards Nick Østergaard [1] https://kicad-downloads.s3.cern.ch/index.html [2] http://www2.futureware.at/~nickoe/kicad-downloads-mirror/ On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 21:53, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > This is primarily a question for the folks setting up and maintaining > our download

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.0-rc1

2019-02-06 Thread Nick Østergaard
@Wayne It is enabled with phoenix and gtk3 as default for Archlinux AUR @Steven You may find inspiration here: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=kicad-git Make sure to use the correct wxWidgets_CONFIG_EXECUTABLE, I don't remember what they are called on fedora, but I think

Re: [Kicad-developers] kicad-pcb.org not reachable

2019-02-05 Thread Nick Østergaard
Yes, I know. tir. 5. feb. 2019 17.29 skrev Jean-Samuel Reynaud : > On my side: > http://kicad-pcb.org is NOT working > but > http://www.kicad-pcb.org IS working... > > They don't have the same address according to DNS: > $ host kicad-pcb.org > kicad-pcb.org has address 188.185.118.209 >

Re: [Kicad-developers] kicad-pcb.org not reachable

2019-02-05 Thread Nick Østergaard
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-website/issues/379#issuecomment-460694422 tir. 5. feb. 2019 17.18 skrev Rene Pöschl : > It seems the kicad website is currently down. > > > ___ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to :

Re: [Kicad-developers] missing http://docs.kicad-pcb.org/master/kicad-doc-HEAD.tar.gz?

2019-01-24 Thread Nick Østergaard
Previously? tor. 24. jan. 2019 17.26 skrev Adam Wolf : > Something didn't work about the redirect previously, Mark, but I'll try > with the new URL. > > Thanks folks! > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 10:07 AM Nick Østergaard > wrote: > >> Hm, I didn't notice that you us

Re: [Kicad-developers] Pulling mac 5.0.2...

2019-01-19 Thread Nick Østergaard
Adam Wolf : > Sorry, resending since I sent from the wrong address. > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019, 6:57 PM Adam Wolf >> If I use git am, how do I release another 5.0.2, Nick? >> >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019, 6:08 PM Nick Østergaard > >>> IMHO, just use git am

Re: [Kicad-developers] Pulling mac 5.0.2...

2019-01-18 Thread Nick Østergaard
> > >> > Adam >> > >> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 1:41 PM Wayne Stambaugh > > <mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > >> > If you use `git am` to apply the patches, you wont get -dirty >> appended >> > to the ve

Re: [Kicad-developers] Pulling mac 5.0.2...

2019-01-18 Thread Nick Østergaard
Mmm, what is wrong wit the git describe when the patches are applied with git am? fre. 18. jan. 2019 20.11 skrev Wayne Stambaugh : > This is a result of modifications to the repo. The --dirty option of > `git describe` checks to see anything is modified and appends -dirty to > the version

Re: [Kicad-developers] SIGTRAP crash with ngspice

2019-01-15 Thread Nick Østergaard
Yes, I am fine with using it in the copr builds for now. Do we need to submit a PR for the libngspice package to let the packager pick it up more easy? I have not seen any activity from him. On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 20:58, Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 1/15/19 9:21 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > Hi

Re: [Kicad-developers] SIGTRAP crash with ngspice

2019-01-14 Thread Nick Østergaard
If needed be that it won't be merged in kicad, we could patch it in with the build scripts for fedora until the libngspice package is updated and this should allow us to enable ngspice on the fedora copr builds. On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 16:30, Steven A. Falco wrote: > I wanted to close the loop

Re: [Kicad-developers] Problems building current source under Msys2

2019-01-09 Thread Nick Østergaard
All on needs to know if in the cmake message, I don't really think we need to do any more hand holding here. On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 16:00, Brian Piccioni wrote: > Thanks, Wayne > > Perhaps it might be useful to add a note to the make instructions to this > effect as per my recent email. > >

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Pcbnew unit test framework

2019-01-06 Thread Nick Østergaard
Except it fails to build for me :/ http://ci.kicad-pcb.org/job/linux-kicad-full-gcc-head/4485/consoleText CMake Error at qa/pcbnew/CMakeLists.txt:62 (target_link_libraries): Target "pcbnew_kiface_objects" of type OBJECT_LIBRARY may not be linked into another target. One may link only to

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Pcbnew unit test framework

2019-01-05 Thread Nick Østergaard
I just did git am 000* and it worked fine for me, on master. On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 at 01:20, John Beard wrote: > On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 4:23 PM Seth Hillbrand wrote: > > > Patch 0002 does not apply cleanly to qa/CMakeLists.txt even after > > applying 0001 > > Hmm, that's odd: I can apply this

Re: [Kicad-developers] grammar.c not found,

2018-12-22 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hi Lachlan, Are you sure that your workspace is clean? I don't see any issues on any platform. Nick On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 at 06:53, Lachlan Audas wrote: > > Hi, just pull the lest-est developer build from git-hub for KiCad > and tried compiling it. But but get this Error, missing file

Re: [Kicad-developers] MacOS 5.0.2 Builds

2018-12-13 Thread Nick Østergaard
I guess Adam is still intending to test them a bit more before calling it done. AFIK he bumped the minimum version of macos a bit hence the uncertainty. https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg38558.html On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 15:29, Seth Hillbrand wrote: > > Hi Adam- > > I see that

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

2018-12-11 Thread Nick Østergaard
It is fixed, I actually mentally has it in my head that it was included in Stevens patch. You may need to refresh the page if your browser caches aggressively. On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 01:01, Seth Hillbrand wrote: > > Am 2018-12-09 13:13, schrieb Wayne Stambaugh: > > I pushed the release

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

2018-12-08 Thread Nick Østergaard
ar as I >> >>> understand, it does not require a rebuild, only replacement of >> >>> configuration files. >> >>> >> >>> Adam, do you think you can still add the patch to the macOS >> >

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

2018-12-06 Thread Nick Østergaard
>>> symbols and footprints, at least). > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh > > >>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com> > > <mailto:stambau...@gmail.com <mailto:stambau...@g

Re: [Kicad-developers] build broken on macOS

2018-12-04 Thread Nick Østergaard
See kicad-mac-builder on the github org tir. 4. dec. 2018 22.48 skrev Andy Peters : > > > On Dec 4, 2018, at 2:45 PM, Adam Wolf > wrote: > > > > I think this is also fixed for me! > > If you guys point me to a build recipe for macOS, I will set up nightly > builds on one of my Mojave machines.

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

2018-12-04 Thread Nick Østergaard
at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh > >>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>> > >>> I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we > >>> want > >>> to do > >>> about tagging th

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

2018-11-26 Thread Nick Østergaard
Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries or are we getting a minor library update as well? On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the 5.0 branch. > Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] wxPhoenix support

2018-11-22 Thread Nick Østergaard
It does not look like it is enabled by now. See the rules file here: https://git.launchpad.net/~js-reynaud/+git/kicad-daily-pkg/tree/debian/rules?h=dailybuild It uses: https://git.launchpad.net/~js-reynaud/+git/kicad-daily-pkg/tree/debian/usewxpython.sh?h=dailybuild To check if the wx-config

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Use absolute path CMAKE_INSTALL_FULL_LIBDIR for 3d viewer PLUGINDIR

2018-11-19 Thread Nick Østergaard
Has this been tested on all three major platforms? On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 17:26, Brüns, Stefan wrote: > > On Freitag, 9. November 2018 00:51:56 CET Brüns, Stefan wrote: > > Currently, the plugindir in the plugin manager is constructed as > >

Re: [Kicad-developers] Build error on Fedora KiCad copr

2018-11-06 Thread Nick Østergaard
Thank you, I can confirm that this was the last change that made the fedora build happy. :) On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 20:33, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > John, > > I merged your patch. > > Thanks, > > Wayne > > On 11/5/2018 9:49 AM, John Beard wrote: > > Gah! Wrong patch! Try this. > > On Mon, Nov 5,

[Kicad-developers] Remove shebang from footprint wizard plugin to fix fedora rawhide build issues

2018-11-03 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hello It seems that we have a footprint wizard plugin which specifies a shebang when we don't really want or need this. I have attached a patch to bring the touch slider one in line with the others. For reference, see https://github.com/KiCad/fedora-packaging/pull/20 Regards Nick Østergaard

Re: [Kicad-developers] mingw64 C++11 status?

2018-10-29 Thread Nick Østergaard
y problems. > I wouldn't recommend that for stable builds but generally speaking, I > don't run in to too many issue when upgrading msys2. > > Cheers, > > Wayne > > On 10/29/2018 1:13 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > A small update as follows: I have u

Re: [Kicad-developers] mingw64 C++11 status?

2018-10-29 Thread Nick Østergaard
currently we are using: mingw-w64-i686-gcc 7.3.0-2 mingw-w64-x86_64-gcc 8.2.0-3 Regards Nick ØstergaardHi On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 at 21:26, Nick Østergaard wrote: > > From https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1800339/comments/9 > > It do indeed seem like updating the msys2 build environme

Re: [Kicad-developers] mingw64 C++11 status?

2018-10-28 Thread Nick Østergaard
forgotten. I will change it over as soon as possible for the future builds. Nick On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 at 01:12, Nick Østergaard wrote: > > Hi Seth, > > Currently the gcc version is: > mingw-w64-i686-binutils 2.28-2 > mingw-w64-i686-gcc 7.1.0-3 > mingw-w64-i686-gcc-ada 7.1.0-3

Re: [Kicad-developers] mingw64 C++11 status?

2018-10-27 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hi Seth, Currently the gcc version is: mingw-w64-i686-binutils 2.28-2 mingw-w64-i686-gcc 7.1.0-3 mingw-w64-i686-gcc-ada 7.1.0-3 mingw-w64-i686-gcc-fortran 7.1.0-3 mingw-w64-i686-gcc-libgfortran 7.1.0-3 mingw-w64-i686-gcc-libs 7.1.0-3 mingw-w64-i686-gcc-objc 7.1.0-3 mingw-w64-x86_64-binutils

Re: [Kicad-developers] Schematic capture: showing connecting line when moving name/value text

2018-10-20 Thread Nick Østergaard
Yeah, it looks like it is missing in Version: (6.0.0-rc1-dev-983-gabe1ffabd), release build On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 at 12:43, jp charras wrote: > > Le 19/10/2018 à 22:28, Henner Zeller a écrit : > > Hi, > > A long time ago, I added a little connecting line while moving the > > label or value in the

Re: [Kicad-developers] Schematic capture: showing connecting line when moving name/value text

2018-10-20 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hmm, this is still available in 5.0.0 at least. On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 at 22:28, Henner Zeller wrote: > > Hi, > A long time ago, I added a little connecting line while moving the > label or value in the schematic editor (BZR4686 now as git commit: > 3132c70e54a0c5a61110eab7662e288398145c15 ), which

Re: [Kicad-developers] Windows build symbol files?

2018-10-11 Thread Nick Østergaard
I was not aware of that change, but I have made a test build if anyone likes to testrun it. This is master built with debug as the build type and the option enabled. http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/windows/testing/patched/kicad-patched-144-ddea4e11d-x86_64.exe On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 22:54, Seth

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.1 status

2018-10-11 Thread Nick Østergaard
FWIW everything should be tagged now. So packagers should be able to bump the pkgver. On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 12:18, Marco Ciampa wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 09:24:02AM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > How much time will our translators and librarians need to tag 5.0.1? > > Hopefully not

Re: [Kicad-developers] GAL branch

2018-09-28 Thread Nick Østergaard
The branch seems to be fairly buildable. It is only some of the first commits that does not build well, see https://jenkins.simonrichter.eu:8443/job/windows-kicad-msys2-evaluate/86/artifact/build-report.txt/*view*/ On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 at 01:39, Simon Richter wrote: > > Hi, > > > Really guys,

Re: [Kicad-developers] [Proposal] merge optional Python3 support

2018-09-24 Thread Nick Østergaard
r., 14. Sep. 2018 um 06:45 Uhr schrieb Nick Østergaard > : >> >> This still needs testing on macos, but as no one have proved it to be broken >> ok macos, I vote for merging as is. >> >> It has been tested on windows and linux. >> >> fre. 14. sep. 2018

Re: [Kicad-developers] [Proposal] merge optional Python3 support

2018-09-14 Thread Nick Østergaard
This still needs testing on macos, but as no one have proved it to be broken ok macos, I vote for merging as is. It has been tested on windows and linux. fre. 14. sep. 2018 11.39 skrev Thomas Pointhuber : > Hi, > > I posted this proposal on launchpad, but no answers so far: > * see:

Re: [Kicad-developers] Nightly builds

2018-09-10 Thread Nick Østergaard
In addition to that I can note; that it follows the 5.0 branch for the kicad source and the kicad-i18n, but is using the 5.0.0 tag for everything else. On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 at 14:29, Nick Østergaard wrote: > > Hi Seth > > I have created them now, they are currently locat

Re: [Kicad-developers] Nightly builds

2018-09-10 Thread Nick Østergaard
It is not ideal, but should be good enough. Nick On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 at 11:11, Nick Østergaard wrote: > > I will add it for the windows builds soon. > > I don't think there is a nightly PPA for the 5.0 branch yet, there was > for the 4.0 branch for a period at least. > On Sun, 9 Sep 2

Re: [Kicad-developers] Nightly builds

2018-09-10 Thread Nick Østergaard
I will add it for the windows builds soon. I don't think there is a nightly PPA for the 5.0 branch yet, there was for the 4.0 branch for a period at least. On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 16:22, Seth Hillbrand wrote: > > Hi All- > > Can we update the packaging scripts that produce nightly packages to also

Re: [Kicad-developers] Bug tracker Milestone

2018-09-05 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hi Seth I have made the milestone, currently with this description. "For stuff we don't really need to block 5.0.1 and we would like to backport to 5.0..." I am not sure we need this milestone, I thought we went for 5.1.0. But as I am far behind with the emails, I created it anyways to not

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Add access to 3d model properties in swig/python

2018-08-31 Thread Nick Østergaard
I cant view the patch via my phone right now, but please add a simple unittest in the qa folder as well. fre. 31. aug. 2018 14.56 skrev Wayne Stambaugh : > Andrew, > > I looked at this patch an it looks fine to me. I fine with exposing the > 3D model properties in the Python scripting. Is

Re: [Kicad-developers] GAL canvas strategy

2018-08-29 Thread Nick Østergaard
In the Symbol Library Browser ons. 29. aug. 2018 01.47 skrev Jeff Young : > Hi Tom, > > I pushed changes to > https://git.launchpad.net/~jeyjey/kicad/log/?h=tom-eeschema-gal-aug27. > > This includes converting the Choose Symbol dialog to GAL, moving the > GAL_DISPLAY_OPTIONS to common, and

Re: [Kicad-developers] Anything I can do for GALification?

2018-08-28 Thread Nick Østergaard
Kevin, that is partly correct. But it is casued because the master branch on Tom's repo is very old. This should not be needed anymore, if it was not removed completely. There should not be any need for bzr anymore. On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 at 16:46, Kevin Cozens wrote: > > On 2018-08-27 03:43 PM,

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.x release

2018-08-21 Thread Nick Østergaard
There are still open issues that either need to be analyzed. https://launchpad.net/kicad/+milestone/5.0.1 On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 at 07:51, Ingo Kletti wrote: > > Hello, > > don't want to sound like a "are we there yet?"-like kid, but: What is > the status of the 5.0.x release? > > I'm asking

Re: [Kicad-developers] Download stats?

2018-08-21 Thread Nick Østergaard
No we do not currently log downloads actively. Den man. 23. jul. 2018 kl. 05.03 skrev Adam Wolf : > > Do we capture download statistics on the file server at all? It would > be really fun to see how many folks are downloading things. I know it > is not an accurate representation of userbase, but

Re: [Kicad-developers] [patch] bring (back) the autoplacer to GAL

2018-08-21 Thread Nick Østergaard
If you just push it to a local branch somwhere I can easily trigger a windows build. Den tir. 21. aug. 2018 kl. 20.05 skrev Wayne Stambaugh : > > Hey Tom, > > On 8/9/2018 10:12 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The patch set in the attachment brings back the legacy autoplacement > >

Re: [Kicad-developers] Using Visual Studio 2017 CE for KiCad development

2018-08-21 Thread Nick Østergaard
Alternatively, we could provide them in a dedicated repository on the kicad org on github. Then they are decoupled from the normal source and the wild west for IDE confs are self contained. This is just a suggestion if you think this would be useful. Den tir. 21. aug. 2018 kl. 19.49 skrev Wayne

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] -Wcatch-value in kicad2step.cpp

2018-08-15 Thread Nick Østergaard
Any update on this? It does not look like it is merged. Den tor. 26. jul. 2018 kl. 17.17 skrev John Beard : > > Hi, > > Another -Wcatch-value warning, this time in kicad2step.cpp. > > Cheers, > > John > ___ > Mailing list:

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] get initial Python 3 support

2018-08-14 Thread Nick Østergaard
errors. It looks like it needs to be updated to py3k syntax. Regards Nick Østergaard Den lør. 4. aug. 2018 kl. 12.23 skrev Thomas Pointhuber : > > Hi, > > I managed to get KiCad to run with Python 3 as well as did some quick > verification that basic methods are working using CLI

Re: [Kicad-developers] Windows performance issue

2018-08-07 Thread Nick Østergaard
It looks lile the patch does not compile, but maybe the patch was not applied correctly. You should be able to look at the patched code in the workspace. tir. 7. aug. 2018 21.39 skrev Nick Østergaard : > I triggered this windows build with the patch. > > https://jenkins.simonrichter.eu

Re: [Kicad-developers] New exit dialog fun

2018-08-05 Thread Nick Østergaard
Yes https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1785113 Den søn. 5. aug. 2018 kl. 21.56 skrev Wayne Stambaugh : > > I just updated my laptop build (Ubuntu 17.10 with stock gnome desktop) > and notice a rather odd layout of the new exit dialog. Is anyone else > seeing this? > > Wayne >

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Update doxygen logo

2018-08-05 Thread Nick Østergaard
The one with the fatter text and lighter blue. søn. 5. aug. 2018 17.22 skrev Kevin Cozens : > On 2018-08-05 08:22 AM, John Beard wrote: > > Eagle-eyed (is that an offensive slur on a KiCad list?) Nick noticed > > that the doxygen header logo is actually slightly incorrect. > > Presumably I used

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Update doxygen logo

2018-08-05 Thread Nick Østergaard
The new patch looks good to me. Den søn. 5. aug. 2018 kl. 14.22 skrev John Beard : > > Hi, > > Eagle-eyed (is that an offensive slur on a KiCad list?) Nick noticed > that the doxygen header logo is actually slightly incorrect. > Presumably I used the wrong file for a source, not sure where it came

Re: [Kicad-developers] Python doxygen for 4.0.7 Stable?

2018-08-04 Thread Nick Østergaard
Ok, I completely forgot about this, but I have uploaded it for 5.0.0 now. Den man. 4. sep. 2017 kl. 18.26 skrev Nick Østergaard : > > No, but good point. I will try to make that available. > > Den 4. sep. 2017 5.10 PM skrev "Greg Smith" : >> >> Is there an equ

[Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Add documentation for KICAD_USE_OCC

2018-08-04 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hello Attached is a patch to update the dev-docs about the new option ot use OCC instead of OCE Regards Nick Østergaard From e8300b778c29f22f94023c4ae1683653f2e84977 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Nick=20=C3=98stergaard?= Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 19:11:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Add

Re: [Kicad-developers] KiCad v5 build warning

2018-08-02 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hello It may be off by default, but should we enable it by default? I think yes. It has been discussed briefly here and there. If we like it in the 5.0 builds I propose we set it as default on on the 5.0 branch now. Nick Den man. 23. jul. 2018 kl. 05.48 skrev Seth Hillbrand : > > Hi Devs- > >

Re: [Kicad-developers] Windows 5.0 Installer size

2018-08-01 Thread Nick Østergaard
Yes. https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-winbuilder/issues/53 It does basically work that way, but simply needs a bit of refactoring on the build server to support both mechanisms, but as getting 5.0.0 has been a priority have not not done it yet. Nick Den ons. 1. aug. 2018 kl. 15.32 skrev Ben Hest

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Rename lang_catalan and lang_chinese SVGs

2018-07-31 Thread Nick Østergaard
FYI there is also a GTK setting to choose to show icons or not, so some users on linux see the icons and other not depending on that option, and also depending on the kicad option to show icons or not. Den tir. 31. jul. 2018 kl. 13.45 skrev John Beard : > > Flag icons are also (ab)used in the

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Re: SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?

2018-07-30 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hi Andrew Seth already shared the build log. tir. 31. jul. 2018 05.29 skrev Andrew Lutsenko : > I just noticed that my patch was reverted with reference to a build > failure with gcc 4.9.2 > > Could you share the error messages too? > Also curios which platform uses such ancient compiler. I

Re: [Kicad-developers] KiCad 5 release announcement update

2018-07-22 Thread Nick Østergaard
I guess we could remove the last section entirely. Please submit a PR for how you would like to describe the assembler code thingie. Den søn. 22. jul. 2018 kl. 22.20 skrev Nick Østergaard : > > woopsie, that meant to only to up to 4.0.7 > Den søn. 22. jul. 2018 kl. 22.19 skrev Simo

Re: [Kicad-developers] KiCad 5 release announcement update

2018-07-22 Thread Nick Østergaard
woopsie, that meant to only to up to 4.0.7 Den søn. 22. jul. 2018 kl. 22.19 skrev Simon Richter : > > Hi, > > On 22.07.2018 18:44, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > > I just pushed the updated version of the v5 release announcement[1]. > > Please let me know if you find any missing features. > > The

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >