Hey Andrew,
On 10/31/19 6:04 PM, Andrew Lutsenko wrote:
> My analysis of threadrippers vs top of the line Ryzens, condensed in 2
> points:
> 1. For significantly more money you get few more cores, a lot more PCIe
> lanes and 20-30% less frequency (single thread performance).
> 2. Unless you know
Perfect.
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 2:49 PM Holger Vogt wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 30.10.2019 um 18:50 schrieb Adam Wolf:
> > Do we want to switch to this for the next stable release? If so, what
> > is the procedure for making sure it's tested?
> >
>
> All my test circuits run well on macOS Catalina
Am 30.10.2019 um 18:50 schrieb Adam Wolf:
Do we want to switch to this for the next stable release? If so, what
is the procedure for making sure it's tested?
All my test circuits run well on macOS Catalina 10.15.1 with ngspice-31
and KiCad version (5.1.4-104-g6347baa61), debug build
Do we want to switch to this for the next stable release? If so, what
is the procedure for making sure it's tested?
Adam
Simulation using ngspice-31 on Windows 10 is o.k. as well the test
circuit set
___
Mailing list:
I will get an RC-1 of the macOS builds out early next week. I need to
rekajigger it so wx builds without debug asserts.
Adam
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 7:26 PM Holger Vogt wrote:
>
>
> > Do we want to switch to this for the next stable release? If so, what
> > is the procedure for making sure
Do we want to switch to this for the next stable release? If so, what
is the procedure for making sure it's tested?
Adam
I have assembled some test circuits. These include the 4 demo circuits
delivered by KiCad and some others, simple and more complex ones. You
may find them at
My analysis of threadrippers vs top of the line Ryzens, condensed in 2
points:
1. For significantly more money you get few more cores, a lot more PCIe
lanes and 20-30% less frequency (single thread performance).
2. Unless you know that your workload is easily parallelizable to 50+
threads,
Threadripper 2920x:
cd kicad-source-mirror
git pull
rm -rf build
mkdir build
cd build
cmake ../
time make -j24
real4m38.833s
user82m30.136s
sys 5m21.663s
As others noted, this is not the new generation coming next month.
Darrell Harmon
On Thu, 2019-10-31 at 09:52 -0400, Wayne
Good to know. I didn't realize the gen 3 threadrippers were not out
yet. I may have to rethink my build.
Thanks,
Wayne
On 10/31/2019 9:57 AM, Jon Evans wrote:
> I don't own either, but am planning a Ryzen build. The Threadrippers
> built on the third-gen Zen are not out yet, but presumably
I don't own either, but am planning a Ryzen build. The Threadrippers built
on the third-gen Zen are not out yet, but presumably they will be even
better as workstation/server CPUs than third-gen Ryzen. On the other hand,
if buying parts today, the 3900X / 3700X seem like way better bang for the
Hi Adam,
I would think so if we to fix the crash bug on macos. We would need a
5.1.5-rc1 build with ngspice 31.3 so users could test. I would hope one
or more of our macos devs would also test this using our spice demos to
at least confirm that things work as expected and that the crash bug has
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 06:49:15PM +0100, Holger Vogt wrote:
> Would you mind to switch to tag ngspice-31.3? There have been a lot
> of bug fixes an enhancements, many of them initiated by KiCad users.
Just did, next MSVC build should use that. Note that we mostly use my MSVC
builds for the
Do we want to switch to this for the next stable release? If so, what
is the procedure for making sure it's tested?
Adam
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:49 PM Holger Vogt wrote:
>
> Simon,
>
> I had a quick look at
> http://ngspice.sourceforge.net/ngspice-eeschema.html#external , where
> you still
Simon,
I had a quick look at
http://ngspice.sourceforge.net/ngspice-eeschema.html#external , where
you still are still using ngspice-28.
Would you mind to switch to tag ngspice-31.3? There have been a lot of
bug fixes an enhancements, many of them initiated by KiCad users. So it
might be
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 05:28:07PM -0400, Brian Piccioni wrote:
> Do you use Visual Studio to compile Kicad? If so, how? I’m not very good with
> things like cmake and I’ve tried and tried to get KiCad (or even just PCBNew)
> to compile with Visual Studio and end up with various problems I
pad.net
> Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] Benchmarking kicad compilation on
> CPUsreleased 6 years apart
>
>
>
> On 29/10/2019 15:40, Simon Richter wrote:
>
> > We could probably shave off another two or three minutes of build time if
>
> > we could make sure tha
, one thing with Visual Studio is that you only need Visual
Studio, not MSYS2, Mingw, etc., etc..
From: Tomasz Wlostowski
Sent: October 29, 2019 2:01 PM
To: Simon Richter; kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] Benchmarking kicad compilation on CPUsreleased
6 years apart
17 matches
Mail list logo
