Re: [Kicad-developers] Packaging question

Am 27.02.2018 um 00:41 schrieb Nick Østergaard: > And I still think it is fine to talk about general packaging things > on the dev list because packagers for multiple platforms are > available here. Often it is also relevant for some development > decisions. I guess this is mostly addressed to me

Re: [Kicad-developers] Packaging question

On 02/26/2018 06:42 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > Please submit your patch as a pull request. Ok. I added a pull request on github to pull the master branch of https://github.com/stevefalco/fedora-packaging/ into the master branch of https://github.com/KiCad/fedora-packaging. This will replace

Re: [Kicad-developers] Packaging question

Please submit your patch as a pull request. 2018-02-26 4:48 GMT+01:00 Steven A. Falco : > On 02/25/2018 07:31 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > > > > > On 02/25/2018 07:25 PM, Rene Pöschl wrote: > >> On 25/02/18 23:29, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > >>> Stephen, > >>> > >>> I would

Re: [Kicad-developers] Packaging question

@Wayne, the copr nighlties we provide for fedora is maintained in https://github.com/KiCad/fedora-packaging Patches should of course be submitted to this as pull requests. I see Aimylios submitted some changes a week or two ago, but I and clearly no one else has reviewed it. I would advise both

Re: [Kicad-developers] Packaging question

On 2/26/2018 3:14 PM, Aimylios wrote: > Am 26.02.2018 um 19:42 schrieb Wayne Stambaugh: >> >> Can someone please help Steve out here?  I don't know where our fedora >> packages are being maintained so I would appreciate someone confirming >> this patch.  I don't know that there is much we can do

Re: [Kicad-developers] Packaging question

Am 26.02.2018 um 19:42 schrieb Wayne Stambaugh: Can someone please help Steve out here? I don't know where our fedora packages are being maintained so I would appreciate someone confirming this patch. I don't know that there is much we can do about the upstream situation. Thanks, Wayne

Re: [Kicad-developers] Packaging question

On 2/25/2018 10:48 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 02/25/2018 07:31 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> >> >> On 02/25/2018 07:25 PM, Rene Pöschl wrote: >>> On 25/02/18 23:29, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: Stephen, I would say that you should pull from HEAD of each library.  This will

Re: [Kicad-developers] Packaging question

Am 26.02.2018 um 01:31 schrieb Wayne Stambaugh: >> As i do not yet plan to ban major changes, i tagged the repos with >> "v5.0.0-rc1" >> > > Rene, > > I don't think there is a major issue here but tagging rc1 wont hurt > anything. Yes, absolutely! As I started about 2 years ago to keep

Re: [Kicad-developers] Packaging question

On 02/25/2018 07:31 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > > On 02/25/2018 07:25 PM, Rene Pöschl wrote: >> On 25/02/18 23:29, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >>> Stephen, >>> >>> I would say that you should pull from HEAD of each library.  This will >>> probably be acceptable up to the stable release.  At this

Re: [Kicad-developers] Packaging question

On 02/25/2018 07:25 PM, Rene Pöschl wrote: On 25/02/18 23:29, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: Stephen, I would say that you should pull from HEAD of each library.  This will probably be acceptable up to the stable release.  At this point we will have to tag each repo.  Are any of our library devs

Re: [Kicad-developers] Packaging question

On 25/02/18 23:29, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: Stephen, I would say that you should pull from HEAD of each library. This will probably be acceptable up to the stable release. At this point we will have to tag each repo. Are any of our library devs planning on doing any major reorganization of the

Re: [Kicad-developers] Packaging question

2018-02-25 23:29 GMT+01:00 Wayne Stambaugh : > Stephen, > > I would say that you should pull from HEAD of each library. This will > probably be acceptable up to the stable release. At this point we will > have to tag each repo. Are any of our library devs planning on

Re: [Kicad-developers] Packaging question

2018-02-25 23:18 GMT+01:00 Carsten Schoenert : > Am 25.02.2018 um 22:25 schrieb Nick Østergaard: > > One final question - does the kicad team guide package development on > each > > of the various distros, or is it up to each distro owner to sort out how > to > > best

Re: [Kicad-developers] Packaging question

Am 25.02.2018 um 22:25 schrieb Nick Østergaard: > One final question - does the kicad team guide package development on each > of the various distros, or is it up to each distro owner to sort out how to > best package the project for their distro? > > I think every other packager shall look at

Re: [Kicad-developers] Packaging question

Stephen, I would say that you should pull from HEAD of each library. This will probably be acceptable up to the stable release. At this point we will have to tag each repo. Are any of our library devs planning on doing any major reorganization of the libraries between now and the stable

Re: [Kicad-developers] Packaging question

Den 25. feb. 2018 3.44 PM skrev "Steven A. Falco" : Now that 5.0.0-rc1 is out, I'd like to ask how this should be packaged. In particular, I'm using Fedora, and my private builds are built based on the mechanisms from the "fedora-packaging" repo on github. However, the

[Kicad-developers] Packaging question

Now that 5.0.0-rc1 is out, I'd like to ask how this should be packaged. In particular, I'm using Fedora, and my private builds are built based on the mechanisms from the "fedora-packaging" repo on github. However, the "fedora-packaging" repo still pulls in the "kicad-libraries" repo from kicad