Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr commit 5572

2015-04-05 Thread Bob Gustafson
Cool. Maybe you are 'there'. Bob G On 04/05/2015 04:28 PM, Garth Corral wrote: Okay, I guess I was closer than I thought (hopefully). In my already-merged-up-to-5571 branch, explicitly specifying a base and other revision seems to do what I want: $ bzr merge -r5571..5572 Merging from remember

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr commit 5572

2015-04-05 Thread Garth Corral
Okay, I guess I was closer than I thought (hopefully). In my already-merged-up-to-5571 branch, explicitly specifying a base and other revision seems to do what I want: $ bzr merge -r5571..5572 Merging from remembered parent location bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/+branch/kicad/ Merging from rem

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr commit 5572

2015-04-05 Thread Garth Corral
As I said, merging up to 5571 was fine; all the changes look sane. Merging just 5572 after that introduces the changes listed, which is not correct. Unfortunately, using the suggested merge-type in the documentation does not resolve my issue, so I’m not really all that close. I need to figure

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr commit 5572

2015-04-05 Thread Bob Gustafson
When you merged r5571, did you get the same listing of modified files? What about the -D (unversioned, deleted) note on your patches/wxwidgets-3.0.0_macosx_magnify_event.patch file ? You could save the r5571 merged file and then build and test that. I think you are pretty close! Have fun Bob G

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr commit 5572

2015-04-05 Thread Garth Corral
Thanks, Wayne. To be honest I’m still trying to figure things out, both with this merge and with bazaar in general. I now have a clue about what’s going on. I merged my branch up to 5571 and all is well. I then tried to merge 5572 and got the following: $ bzr merge -r5572 Merging from rememb

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr commit 5572

2015-04-05 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
I noticed an odd history tree in my checked out branch before I made this commit but when I checked the status it showed the correct files committed. I'm not sure what's going on here. I did merge some code into this branch for testing and then did a revert on the whole branch so it should have u

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr commit 5572

2015-04-05 Thread Garth Corral
Yes. Thanks, Nick. Sorry, I should have been more clear. I only noticed this, though, when I merged trunk into my branch and got a bunch of diffs that didn’t seem right. There were diffs that seemingly wanted to revert changes I’d already taken, and they were all these mystery changes. I’ve

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr commit 5572

2015-04-05 Thread Nick Østergaard
2015-04-05 10:11 GMT+02:00 jp charras : > Le 05/04/2015 06:02, Garth Corral a écrit : >> >> Is it just me or did this commit clobber a bunch of files it probably >> shouldn’t have? >> >> Not being super familiar with bazaar I’m not quite sure what I’m >> seeing. >> >> For example, if you browse the

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr commit 5572

2015-04-05 Thread jp charras
Le 05/04/2015 06:02, Garth Corral a écrit : > > Is it just me or did this commit clobber a bunch of files it probably > shouldn’t have? > > Not being super familiar with bazaar I’m not quite sure what I’m > seeing. > > For example, if you browse the code to > Documents/compiling/mac-osx.txt in l

[Kicad-developers] bzr commit 5572

2015-04-04 Thread Garth Corral
Is it just me or did this commit clobber a bunch of files it probably shouldn’t have? Not being super familiar with bazaar I’m not quite sure what I’m seeing. For example, if you browse the code to Documents/compiling/mac-osx.txt in launchpad it claims that the latest rev is 5572, but the chan