Looks like we are missing a pad-stack editor. I am sure I will run
into the sam issue soon: Nex board will be a 4-layer and I know that
at least one of the PBC manufacturers doesn't want unconnected inner
annular rings.
Is it already on the wish list?
Cheers, Heiko
--- In
The one I am dealing with wants the outside rings to be at least 0.005 but the
inner ones to be at least 0.010 inches.
It must be some kind of manufacturing issue (accuracy? alignment?).
Either way it boils down to the same problem: different pad sizes for different
layers.
Martin
Yep, it's a pretty common requirement to have inner rings larger than
the ones on the surface. And, yes, it has something to do with
accuracy at the stacking process.
So, we are back to square one which means editing the GERBER files or
choosing a different manufacturer
Cheers, Heiko
---
Just out of curiousity, who is your board house?
Doug
--- In kicad-users@yahoogroups.com, mkajdas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My PCB house DRC check complains about vias having pads on inner layers.
How to have via pads on the outside and no pads inside the board on 4
layer board?
The inner
www.4pcb.com
Doug Deeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just out of curiousity, who is your board house?
Doug
--- In kicad-users@yahoogroups.com, mkajdas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My PCB house DRC check complains about vias having pads on inner layers.
How to have via pads on the outside
--- In kicad-users@yahoogroups.com, kajdas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I did that, I use standard vias, 0.01 drill. 0.025 pad, no
micro, no buried, no blind.
I just need to specify different pad size (or remove) on inner
layer.
I'd suggest making the via sizes an odd-ball number, say
