[kicad-users] Re: Representation advice

2006-11-18 Thread Geert Vancompernolle
Hi Charles, That's great! This connector is already "ready-made". Excellent. Now I can use this connector in my design to represent the FoxBoard. Thanks very much for pointing this one out. Best rgds, --Geert --- In kicad-users@yahoogroups.com, "rohchar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can

[kicad-users] Re: Representation advice

2006-11-18 Thread rohchar
hi, --- In kicad-users@yahoogroups.com, "Geert Vancompernolle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, > > Was a bit a silly question from my side. > > First off, I don't have "implemented" the FoxBoard myself, so I > should never represent the connectors of the FoxBoard in my > schematics. > >

[kicad-users] Re: Representation advice

2006-11-18 Thread Geert Vancompernolle
Sorry, Was a bit a silly question from my side. First off, I don't have "implemented" the FoxBoard myself, so I should never represent the connectors of the FoxBoard in my schematics. I should only represent the in/outputs I'm using from the FoxBoard. Using a connector like you proposed, is OK

[kicad-users] Re: Representation advice

2006-11-18 Thread Geert Vancompernolle
Hi, Thanks for the proposal. I've currently done it like this in EeSchema: 1. Representation of the FoxBoard on the root sheet (not all FoxBoard pins are there, since I don't need them all): http://img179.imageshack.us/my.php?image=foxboardrootsheetcz1.png 2. Representation of the "inner" FoxB

[kicad-users] Re: Representation advice

2006-11-18 Thread rohchar
Hi, how do you intend to connect the daugter board to your application ? Using two 40-way ribbon cable ? Just put 2 40-pin connectors in your design (CONN_20X2). Or using two 40 pin dual row straight headers ? You can do same as above, or better, create your specific symbol and a module includi